Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | pozzugno@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? |
| Date | 2012-04-27 02:20 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <16202442.82.1335518457457.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbez18> (permalink) |
| References | <jnbudg$vhc$1@nnrp.ngi.it> <9vtng0Fs7gU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> |
Il giorno giovedì 26 aprile 2012 21:54:40 UTC+2, Jens Thoms Toerring ha scritto: > pozz > wrote: > > I'll start a new application in a short time and I'm wondering if C > > language is good enough for that. > > > The application will be simple: it should implement some TCP/UDP > > protocols (like TFTP, BOOTP,...) with a simple GUI. It will run on > > Windows platforms, but the possibility to run it on Linux would be nice. > > > Is C language suitable for this kind of applications? Which kind of > > cross-platform libraries should I use to manage IP protocols and simple > > GUIs? Could python or other high-level (script) languages be a better > > choice? > > Of course, all this can be done in C (most scripting languages > are actually implemented in C, so everything you can do in > those languages can obviously be done in C). Oh, yes. I know C is powerful enough to manage comple network protocols and beautiful graphical interfaces. The questions was related to a simple application where I don't want to loose too much time to find a suitable network and graphic library and fine tune them. C can do anything at the cost of greater complexity. I'm asking if a high-level scripting language can be more effective for simple tasks and applications. > But note that C > has no "native" support for networking or graphics, thus the > need for additional (cross-platform) libraries (unless you're > keen to re-invent the wheel;-). Absolutely no, I want to reuse existing libraries. > For TFTP and other protocols > libcurl seems to be a candidate to take a look at. I don't > know about BOOTP (wasn't that obsoleted by DHCP?). I have to implement a sub-set of DHCP protocol, similar to the original BOOTP. It's for an Ethernet firmware upgrade for and embedded gadget. > For gra- > phics the only cross-platform library for C I know about is > GTK+ (but I never used it) - most other seem to require C++. > > If using Python or some other scripting language would be pre- > ferable depends on what you want to do there, if you need max- > imum performance, and if you feel comfortable with that lan- > guage. Perhaps it might be a good idea to start with a scrip- > ting language and see if it does ok, otherwise you can still > re-implement the stuff in C, drawing on the experiences you > made. Ok, thank you for your suggestions.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2012-04-26 18:50 +0200
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? "Heinrich Wolf" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-04-26 19:03 +0200
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-04-26 11:52 -0700
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-04-26 19:54 +0000
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-04-27 10:02 +0100
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? pozzugno@gmail.com - 2012-04-27 02:20 -0700
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-04-27 07:27 -0700
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2012-04-27 17:07 +0200
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-04-29 04:08 -0700
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? TheGunslinger <mikiesrunsbaal.sec@sbcglobal.net> - 2012-04-29 12:57 -0700
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-04-27 17:07 +0000
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-04-29 04:15 -0700
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-04-27 19:16 +0100
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-04-27 22:37 +0000
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-28 03:46 -0700
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-04-29 04:37 -0700
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-05-28 21:13 -0500
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-27 00:57 -0700
Re: High-level network programming: is C language suitable for that? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-04-27 10:56 +0100
csiph-web