Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #38220
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question |
| Date | 2020-02-27 22:54 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <14820587.MlQR9muzrU@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <2e6b89f4-5561-43ab-8bc0-7d5c24f96db5@googlegroups.com> <2a154a66-7f18-4c67-b6e9-ffe1f9b5d395@googlegroups.com> <77eb2109-61df-4eba-b5b6-78a494d3d5f8@googlegroups.com> |
Julio Di Egidio wrote: > On Thursday, 27 February 2020 15:29:24 UTC+1, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: >> On Thursday, February 27, 2020 at 6:08:45 AM UTC-6, dr.j.r...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> > [...] >> >> > TwoToPowerOf63 = Math.pow(2, 63) // 2^63 >> >> In modern JavaScript: >> >> let twoToPowerOf63 = 2**63; > > "Modern" as in needing a transpiler? No. >> > And, does currently predominantly-used JavaScript natively have >> > greater-precision types of numbers, such as 64-bit unsigned >> > integers? >> >> Yes: >> >> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/BigInt> > > Look at the Compatibility table at the bottom. > > I guess we have a different interpretation of "currently > predominantly-used JavaScript natively"... You have no clue: <https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share#monthly-200901-202001> -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> <https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Arithmetic Accuracy Question dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2020-02-27 04:08 -0800
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2020-02-27 06:02 -0800
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-02-27 06:29 -0800
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2020-02-27 06:39 -0800
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-02-27 07:49 -0800
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2020-02-27 08:00 -0800
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-02-27 08:20 -0800
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2020-02-27 22:54 +0100
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2020-02-28 09:24 +0100
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-02-28 06:48 -0800
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2020-02-28 08:32 +0000
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2020-02-28 09:20 +0100
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2020-02-28 11:06 +0100
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2020-03-26 12:04 -0700
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2020-03-26 13:17 -0700
Re: Arithmetic Accuracy Question dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2020-03-26 11:24 -0700
csiph-web