Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #28200

Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash

From nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash
Date 2015-03-13 16:45 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <130320151645060410%nospam@nospam.invalid> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <1m16keq.1hnz2ev1ftu1roN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <slrnmg2ctj.2v8h.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> <51W5y0sPNk52-pn2-qsCL33jUvE6S@localhost> <120320152241430265%nospam@nospam.invalid> <51W5y0sPNk52-pn2-MpffdP486l12@localhost>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <51W5y0sPNk52-pn2-MpffdP486l12@localhost>, John Varela
<newlamps@verizon.net> wrote:

> > > > Not installing Flash has done very well for me for about 8 years or so.
> > >  
> > > I still find an occasional web site that insists on Flash. 
> > > Smithsonian.com is particularly bad. Youtube is getting better, 
> > > however.
> > 
> > youtube does not need flash and hasn't for a fairly long time.
> 
> It seems no one explained that to Firefox.

why don't you do that?

Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-12 02:17 +0000
  Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-12 16:57 +1300
    Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-12 06:34 +0000
      Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-13 01:14 +0000
        Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 22:41 -0400
          Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-13 15:56 +1300
            Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 23:05 -0400
          Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-13 19:09 +0000
            Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 16:45 -0400
        Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-13 05:19 +0000
    Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-03-12 09:30 +0000
    Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-13 01:11 +0000
      Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-13 15:29 +1300
        Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-13 19:12 +0000
        Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash DaveC <invalid@invalid.net> - 2015-03-14 09:07 -0800
          Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-15 07:13 +1300
    Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> - 2015-03-16 04:30 +0000
      Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-16 19:00 +1300
  Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-03-13 13:40 -0700
    Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-15 00:21 +0000
      Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-03-14 18:45 -0700
        Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-16 00:58 +0000
          Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-16 23:28 +0000

csiph-web