Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1022
| From | Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally@nyu.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations |
| Date | 2013-10-28 20:41 -0400 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <13-10-039@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <13-10-026@comp.compilers> <13-10-029@comp.compilers> <13-10-037@comp.compilers> |
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:50 PM, <christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote: >> [I think you mean they're not associative. I don't know any situations >> where a+b != b+a, but lots where a+(b+c) != (a+b)+c -John] > > Take fused multiply-add, and the expression a*b + c*d. > It can be evaluated either as fma (a, b, c*d) or fma (c, d, a*b). > > It would seem natural that the code for a*b + c*d and for c*d + a*b > would be different, with different results. Right, that's called reassociation. The order of operations in the expression tree has changed, so the finite precision rounding occurs on different intermediate results. The same problem exists in some floating point parallel reductions and such. Most compilers will offer a directive, similar to FP_CONTRACT, for such critical pieces of code. Some compilers [the good ones ;)] even have flags to disable optimization passes that involve reassociation. -Cameron
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Compiler optimization and floating point operations Abid <abidmuslim@gmail.com> - 2013-10-23 13:47 -0700
Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally@nyu.edu> - 2013-10-23 22:55 -0400
Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-10-24 02:56 +0000
Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2013-10-24 07:41 -0400
Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@bourguet.org> - 2013-10-24 15:51 +0200
Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> - 2013-10-24 16:38 +0000
Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk - 2013-10-28 15:54 -0700
Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2013-10-24 15:51 -0400
Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-10-24 20:21 +0000
Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk - 2013-10-28 15:50 -0700
Re: Compiler optimization and floating point operations Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally@nyu.edu> - 2013-10-28 20:41 -0400
csiph-web