Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #266747
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-09 19:45 -0800 |
| References | (1 earlier) <D084EAE5.4104B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <cb4c04ea-d40e-4e83-b512-72d766cd4984@googlegroups.com> <hg9e.fjeop@rooftop.invalid> <a941fb39-832e-4daa-8dca-ce85c00fd571@googlegroups.com> <bghv9.afeap3@rooftop.invalid> |
| Message-ID | <12bc1335-eac1-40bb-be99-bc8c1fa52159@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? |
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
On Sunday, November 9, 2014 6:50:46 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, November 9, 2014 11:09:04 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Sunday, November 9, 2014 9:57:01 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > >> >> On 11/9/14, 9:31 AM, in article m3o4sd$hrh$1@dont-email.me, "DFS" > >> >> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > When the median would be much more useful and revealing? > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm 100% sure they do it to make Linux and its proponents look better. > >> >> > But it hides the effects of the large donations made by a few Linux people. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > https://www.humblebundle.com > >> >> > > >> >> > The Numbers (around 10:40am today) > >> >> > > >> >> > Total payments: $1,110,293.65 > >> >> > Number of purchases: 149,494 > >> >> > Average purchase: $7.43 > >> >> > Average Windows: $7.08 > >> >> > Average Mac: $8.55 > >> >> > Average Linux: $10.06 > >> >> > > >> >> > The avg Linux purchase is 42% higher than the avg Windows purchase. The > >> >> > reason is because Windows gamers buy good games at $30 to $60 a pop, and > >> >> > don't have as much to spend on these crapola games - which are top > >> >> > flight games for deprived Linux victims. > >> >> > >> >> This was discussed in some detail a while back with a previous bundle. It > >> >> was amazing how many in COLA could not understand the basic math / stats. cc > >> >> was absolutely hilarious in his ignorance about it. > >> > >> > As hilarious as this? > >> > >> > "...by definition a set MUST contain all of the features of a subset, otherwise it (the subset) wouldn't be a subset." > >> > >> > Your reply: > >> > >> > "Items in a set need not contain all the items in any given subset within that set." > >> > >> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/sN1HvpwXrKw/7nrGK5fKuwIJ > >> > >> > I don't think so ;) > >> > >> The set "balls" does not contain all of the features of its subset > >> "red balls." > > > Which has nothing to do with what you responded to. > > I responded at the end, I saw... you responded with a lie about "features". Why do I jump straight to a "lie" and not give you the benefit of the doubt? Keep reading... > but my response was more directed to your > "quoted" paraphrase of the statement at the link, You're lying here, too. I didn't 'paraphrase' Snit, I quoted him... as anyone can clearly see. I doubt two blatant inaccuracies in a row is a coincidence, liar. > which has something to > do with incest as a subset of sex. Fact: Snit's quoted statement is about set theory. Fact: Snit's quoted statement doesn't require any additional context to show that his statement is erroneous on the topic of set theory. > The claim, which Snit disagreed with, > implied that a set must contain all the features of any of its subsets. > That claim is false, so Snit was correct to object. Irrelevant. Snit's erroneous, self contained statement is about set theory and it's a statement that has *all* the context needed to see how confused he is on that topic. > Although he did > incorrectly use the term "items" instead of "features" in his objection, > that likely *typo* does not make the original claim true any more true. > That it was a typo is obvious from his entire statement, where he > goes on to reference "features," not "items": LOL! The word "item" is not a "typo" for a "feature of an item, no matter how high you are, liar. I don't get it, why are you repeatedly lying and doing it in ways that are ridiculous? No matter... that's the 3rd lie in a row so you're out. > <quote> > Items in a set need not contain all the items in any given subset within > that set. Even though incest is sex, not all "sex MUST include all of the > features of incest." > </quote> LOL! Snit referenced all kind of things in numerous ways in his *many* arguments on incest, there are TONS of them... he often argued BS (and this isn't the first time Snit had confusion over set theory). Even if this was just a simple, isolated error (and it isn't), no one would deserve having it pointed out more than Snit, who has actually done such things for over a decade (and much worse). BTW, you lie no better than he does, you should work on that if you care about not being detected.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-09 11:31 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 09:56 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? charlescroyden3@gmail.com - 2014-11-09 09:13 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:18 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 09:25 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-09 12:39 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:50 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? charlescroyden3@gmail.com - 2014-11-09 09:52 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:58 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Jorge Dimaggio <jorgedimaggio@spammenot.org> - 2014-11-09 13:34 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-09 15:32 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 13:37 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-10 08:09 -0600
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-10 09:15 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-11 09:24 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-11 10:21 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-11 16:45 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-11-09 11:55 -0600
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:58 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-10 10:35 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-11-09 11:08 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 12:22 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-09 14:42 -0600
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-09 19:22 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-10 06:33 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-10 10:47 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-10 11:07 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-10 19:40 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-10 19:33 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-10 20:09 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-11 08:55 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 09:15 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-09 18:09 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 11:57 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 10:54 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 01:50 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 19:45 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 04:35 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:02 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 05:28 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 22:37 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 22:25 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:39 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 22:19 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:25 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 21:28 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 04:43 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:09 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 05:34 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-10 07:37 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-10 08:26 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 22:18 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:23 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 20:54 -0800
csiph-web