Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #266747

Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform?

Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date 2014-11-09 19:45 -0800
References (1 earlier) <D084EAE5.4104B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <cb4c04ea-d40e-4e83-b512-72d766cd4984@googlegroups.com> <hg9e.fjeop@rooftop.invalid> <a941fb39-832e-4daa-8dca-ce85c00fd571@googlegroups.com> <bghv9.afeap3@rooftop.invalid>
Message-ID <12bc1335-eac1-40bb-be99-bc8c1fa52159@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform?
From Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sunday, November 9, 2014 6:50:46 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 9, 2014 11:09:04 AM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Sunday, November 9, 2014 9:57:01 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> >> >> On 11/9/14, 9:31 AM, in article m3o4sd$hrh$1@dont-email.me, "DFS"
> >> >> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > When the median would be much more useful and revealing?
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > I'm 100% sure they do it to make Linux and its proponents look better.
> >> >> > But it hides the effects of the large donations made by a few Linux people.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > https://www.humblebundle.com
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > The Numbers (around 10:40am today)
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Total payments: $1,110,293.65
> >> >> > Number of purchases: 149,494
> >> >> > Average purchase: $7.43
> >> >> > Average Windows:  $7.08
> >> >> > Average Mac:      $8.55
> >> >> > Average Linux:   $10.06
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > The avg Linux purchase is 42% higher than the avg Windows purchase.  The
> >> >> > reason is because Windows gamers buy good games at $30 to $60 a pop, and
> >> >> > don't have as much to spend on these crapola games - which are top
> >> >> > flight games for deprived Linux victims.
> >> >> 
> >> >> This was discussed in some detail a while back with a previous bundle. It
> >> >> was amazing how many in COLA could not understand the basic math / stats. cc
> >> >> was absolutely hilarious in his ignorance about it.
> >> 
> >> > As hilarious as this?
> >> 
> >> > "...by definition a set MUST contain all of the features of a subset, otherwise it (the subset) wouldn't be a subset." 
> >> 
> >> > Your reply:
> >> 
> >> > "Items in a set need not contain all the items in any given subset within that set." 
> >> 
> >> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/sN1HvpwXrKw/7nrGK5fKuwIJ 
> >> 
> >> > I don't think so ;)
> >> 
> >> The set "balls" does not contain all of the features of its subset
> >> "red balls."
> 
> > Which has nothing to do with what you responded to.
> 
> I responded at the end, 

I saw... you responded with a lie about "features". Why do I jump straight to a "lie" and not give you the benefit of the doubt? Keep reading...

> but my response was more directed to your
> "quoted" paraphrase of the statement at the link,

You're lying here, too. I didn't 'paraphrase' Snit, I quoted him... as anyone can clearly see. I doubt two blatant inaccuracies in a row is a coincidence, liar.

> which has something to
> do with incest as a subset of sex. 

Fact: Snit's quoted statement is about set theory.

Fact: Snit's quoted statement doesn't require any additional context to show that his statement is erroneous on the topic of set theory.

> The claim, which Snit disagreed with,
> implied that a set must contain all the features of any of its subsets.
> That claim is false, so Snit was correct to object.  

Irrelevant. Snit's erroneous, self contained statement is about set theory and it's a statement that has *all* the context needed to see how confused he is on that topic.

> Although he did
> incorrectly use the term "items" instead of "features" in his objection,
> that likely *typo* does not make the original claim true any more true.
> That it was a typo is obvious from his entire statement, where he
> goes on to reference "features," not "items":

LOL! The word "item" is not a "typo" for a "feature of an item, no matter how high you are, liar.  I don't get it, why are you repeatedly lying and doing it in ways that are ridiculous?  No matter... that's the 3rd lie in a row so you're out. 

> <quote>
> Items in a set need not contain all the items in any given subset within
> that set.  Even though incest is sex, not all "sex MUST include all of the
> features of incest."
> </quote>

LOL! Snit referenced all kind of things in numerous ways in his *many* arguments on incest, there are TONS of them...  he often argued BS (and this isn't the first time Snit had confusion over set theory). 

Even if this was just a simple, isolated error (and it isn't), no one would deserve having it pointed out more than Snit, who has actually done such things for over a decade (and much worse). BTW, you lie no better than he does, you should work on that if you care about not being detected.



Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-09 11:31 -0500
  Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 09:56 -0700
    Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? charlescroyden3@gmail.com - 2014-11-09 09:13 -0800
      Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:18 -0700
      Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 09:25 -0800
      Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-09 12:39 -0500
        Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:50 -0700
          Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? charlescroyden3@gmail.com - 2014-11-09 09:52 -0800
            Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:58 -0700
              Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Jorge Dimaggio <jorgedimaggio@spammenot.org> - 2014-11-09 13:34 -0500
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-09 15:32 -0500
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 13:37 -0700
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-10 08:09 -0600
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-10 09:15 -0500
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-11 09:24 -0500
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-11 10:21 -0500
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-11 16:45 -0800
        Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-11-09 11:55 -0600
          Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:58 -0700
          Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-10 10:35 -0500
        Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-11-09 11:08 -0800
          Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 12:22 -0700
        Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-09 14:42 -0600
          Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-09 19:22 -0500
        Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-10 06:33 -0800
          Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-10 10:47 -0500
            Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-10 11:07 -0500
              Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-10 19:40 -0500
            Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-10 19:33 -0500
              Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-10 20:09 -0500
          Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-11 08:55 -0500
    Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 09:15 -0800
      Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-09 18:09 +0000
        Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 11:40 -0700
          Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 11:57 -0800
        Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 10:54 -0800
          Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 01:50 +0000
            Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 19:45 -0800
              Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 04:35 +0000
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:02 -0800
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 05:28 +0000
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 22:37 -0700
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 22:25 -0800
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:39 -0800
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 22:19 -0700
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:25 -0800
            Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 21:28 -0700
              Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 04:43 +0000
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:09 -0800
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 05:34 +0000
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-10 07:37 -0700
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-10 08:26 -0800
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 22:18 -0700
                Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:23 -0800
              Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 20:54 -0800

csiph-web