Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #28184

Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash

From nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash
Date 2015-03-12 23:05 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <120320152305486989%nospam@nospam.invalid> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <1m16keq.1hnz2ev1ftu1roN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <slrnmg2ctj.2v8h.g.kreme@kreme.eternal-september.org> <51W5y0sPNk52-pn2-qsCL33jUvE6S@localhost> <120320152241430265%nospam@nospam.invalid> <1m18cac.10vc3he573wc2N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <1m18cac.10vc3he573wc2N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>, Jamie
Kahn Genet <jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> wrote:

> > > > Not installing Flash has done very well for me for about 8 years or so.
> > >  
> > > I still find an occasional web site that insists on Flash. 
> > > Smithsonian.com is particularly bad. Youtube is getting better, 
> > > however.
> > 
> > youtube does not need flash and hasn't for a fairly long time.
> 
> For most videos, not all.

all of them now, since youtube officially supports html5, but before
that, it was close enough to all to be considered all.

the iphone came out in 2007, didn't have flash, and worked just fine
with youtube.

Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-12 02:17 +0000
  Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-12 16:57 +1300
    Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-12 06:34 +0000
      Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-13 01:14 +0000
        Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 22:41 -0400
          Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-13 15:56 +1300
            Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-12 23:05 -0400
          Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-13 19:09 +0000
            Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-13 16:45 -0400
        Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-13 05:19 +0000
    Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-03-12 09:30 +0000
    Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-13 01:11 +0000
      Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-13 15:29 +1300
        Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-13 19:12 +0000
        Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash DaveC <invalid@invalid.net> - 2015-03-14 09:07 -0800
          Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-15 07:13 +1300
    Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> - 2015-03-16 04:30 +0000
      Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-03-16 19:00 +1300
  Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-03-13 13:40 -0700
    Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-15 00:21 +0000
      Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-03-14 18:45 -0700
        Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-16 00:58 +0000
          Re: Firefox equvalent of ClickToFlash "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-03-16 23:28 +0000

csiph-web