Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #94924
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: GCC vs. LLVM |
| Date | 2026-11-02 10:39 +0000 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <11c9p8l$2oln7$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <11c73ip$1s4us$1@kst.eternal-september.org> <2oWdnWWut6BKWXr3nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <11c93bv$2ibdp$1@kst.eternal-september.org> <DbqcnUXBFt-yrnX3nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <11c9cqh$2k6jt$1@kst.eternal-september.org> |
On 02/11/2026 07:06, Keith Thompson wrote: > You can indicate that you posted something by identifying it in the > headers. If you think you're important enough to use a different > layout to tell us it's you, you're mistaken. > Thunderbird has a useful feature - rewrap. It can remove a lot of stylistic egotisms Sadly not CAPITALISATION... -- "I am inclined to tell the truth and dislike people who lie consistently. This makes me unfit for the company of people of a Left persuasion, and all women"
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 03:11 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-10-31 17:28 +1000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 13:25 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-10-31 10:30 -0400
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 15:12 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-31 19:21 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-10-31 21:06 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-01 00:39 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-11-01 01:45 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-01 09:05 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-01 03:51 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-11-01 02:16 -0800
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-01 18:01 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-11-01 20:25 -0800
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-02 01:52 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-11-01 23:06 -0800
Re: GCC vs. LLVM The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-02 10:39 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-02 11:37 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-11-02 16:54 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-02 11:57 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-11-02 23:16 +0100
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-02 20:47 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-11-02 23:01 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-02 21:03 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-11-03 02:44 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-11-01 10:07 -0500
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-01 18:31 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-11-02 11:54 -0500
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-11-02 14:18 -0500
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-11-02 20:17 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-11-03 08:22 -0500
csiph-web