Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.global-warming > #781879
| From | multistrada <ab@in.valid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.global-warming, sci.environment, aus.general, aus.politics |
| Subject | Re: a small but significant win |
| Date | 2026-10-15 13:00 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <11ar7rm$2mbi6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <gtpvcldd7pch92hd3j9gotj2h3nqi2ktvf@4ax.com> <11aopgc$1r235$4@dont-email.me> <7mrvcltj8qgdcjmiq9rfsh6ms1jm1gvpse@4ax.com> <11aqvtd$2iuq6$3@dont-email.me> <6462dl18tqbq39hs4f5ko0dh7vhaih92oe@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 10/15/26 12:43 PM, Petzl wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:44:29 -0600, multistrada <ab@in.valid> wrote: > >> On 10/14/26 3:24 PM, Petzl wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 14:42:52 -0600, multistrada <ab@in.valid> wrote: >>> >>>>> I would like to see a new government and part of me doesn't’give a >>>>> damn who’s in it as long as it doesn't’include anybody from the Labor, >>>>> Liberal or Green party organizations that show itself to be without >>>>> shame or principle >>>>> >>>>> All spineless and authoritarian both cowardly and war mongering at the >>>>> same time >>>> >>>> Sound rejections all. >>>> >>>> So how about your version of the LP? >>>> >>> Consider myself Labor Party, this "Labor Party" has no Labor people in >>> Cabinet. Haven't for decades! LP the same. >> >> We historically have had parties morph out of what they were as well, >> just not lately - for that we have the uniparty complicity scam. >> > Suppose it's free enterprise? > Honesty though thrown out the door! 100% yes! But the elites who profit have buried and nested agendas to service. Pick one (or the other) but never see what it truly is until it's too late. >> >>> Never voted Liberal Rod Speed and Ördög claim I do. >>> When I vote if their is some sort of Christian in poll, that's who I >>> vote for, realistically though with Preference system they are a >>> funnel for the pretend LP. >> >> Sad. >> > I like first past the winning post as in it gives a better more honest > Government not one rum by lobbyists Indeed so. > "Our" Media and Major parties are run by lobbyists > Lobbyists write the laws, parliament sells the laws, > paid lucrative commissions for passing their laws. > That’s the modern legislative business of parliament. This is our peril too, with different names attached. >> >>> Every Western countries are finding all you are ending up with a Party >>> system are well spoken greedy, lying grabbing corrupt career >>> politician whose only purpose is to keep their snout and trotters in >>> the golden trough >> >> Fact. >> > Afraid so, grifters all and only allow other griffters in politics to > protect each other! As George Carlin (the late comedian) opined - "it's a big club...and we ain't in it..." >> >>> latest headline none of this travel has anything to her Cabinet >>> position just thieving lying grabbing what she can take like all the >>> others >>> >>> Coalition slams Small Business Minister Anne Aly over $150,000 >>> taxpayer-funded overseas travel >> >> Wow - big $$! >> > Only when and if they are caught (mainly by media not internally) the > are only made to pay back what they were found to be stolen! You do realize this is also the Kimberly Guilfoile saga right now unfolding here: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DecDjorgAuz/ The White House has asked Kimberly Guilfoyle to resign as U.S. ambassador to Greece, after The Wall Street Journal reported that she had solicited $100,000 from a Trump donor in the run-up to her confirmation hearing last year. > But no actual penalty this evidently has not stopped her or others > trying again? > It is simply a breakdown of how the political system protects its own. > > Suggest more fitting ,a multiple of inappropriate costs be repaid, > not just amount that's been found this time round. And on and on it goes... >> >>> Not one member of the Albanese Cabinet is a labourer in the >>> traditional Labor sense. There are no miners, factory hands, railway >>> workers, construction labourers or long-term tradespeople who came >>> directly from the shop floor. The people now speaking for Labor >>> largely come from universities, party offices, ministerial staff >>> positions, unions, law and professional policy careers. >> >> It's like "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" - apparatchik style. >> > apparatchik style is what is known in Westminster Government as > "Yes Minister" and "Yes Prime minister" those in government public > service :-) > Shelved after this one exposing the cons of Global Warming > https://ok.ru/video/6904831150790 ;-) "Oh come off it Humnphrey!" "The prime minister's not here to do what's right..." >> > -- > Petzl > In a democracy of course you always get a choice > Do you want to be governed by the red or by the blue > it’s entirely up to you > Do you want to be patronized or condescended to, by liars or by crooks > you get to choose. > Would you prefer your fundamental values to be insulted or ignored by > con-men or by charlatans > In short do you want your influence to be zero or nil > and when would you like to be listened to, never or not at all, it’s > your choice > Do you want, some more choices. > Take-it-or-leave-it > Now there’s a real choice > we have proportional voting in Australia USE IT > I’d be happy with any kind of representation wouldn't you I'm not in multi-party squeeze play, so... I guess you can rank and hope? > I would like to see a new government and part of me doesn't’give a > damn who’s in it as long as it doesn't’include anybody from the Labor, > Liberal or Green party organizations that show itself to be without > shame or principle Good luck. > All spineless and authoritarian both cowardly and war mongering at the > same time A brilliant disguise, eh?
Back to alt.global-warming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-07 03:19 +0000
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-12 12:57 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:23 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:50 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 13:51 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:46 -0600
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:41 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> - 2026-10-13 21:19 -0700
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:02 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:11 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:42 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:18 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 07:29 +0000
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 03:08 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 17:02 +0000
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:35 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:48 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:56 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:02 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:36 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:04 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:01 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:41 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-16 20:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:39 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 11:03 -0600
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:32 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:42 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:24 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:10 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:44 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 05:43 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 13:00 -0600
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:48 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-16 03:06 +0000
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:11 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:26 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:42 -0600
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:15 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-14 20:34 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 09:54 +0000
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:01 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 22:09 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:52 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 23:49 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 03:25 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:10 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:00 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:15 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:45 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:51 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:06 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:34 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 09:31 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 11:07 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:32 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:39 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:03 +1100
Re: a small but significant win 000-666 <8-0-15@never.invalid> - 2026-10-14 21:49 +0000
csiph-web