Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.theory > #143998

Play Snaky, who did it better OpenAI or Anthropic? (Re: Math is the premier AI Victim [Billions of $USD later])

From Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.theory, comp.lang.c, comp.lang.c++
Subject Play Snaky, who did it better OpenAI or Anthropic? (Re: Math is the premier AI Victim [Billions of $USD later])
Date 2026-10-08 23:37 +0200
Message-ID <11a92fn$15avn$4@solani.org> (permalink)
References <119omv2$pkou$5@solani.org> <119pfap$nbsg$2@solani.org> <11a7tqg$11os2$3@solani.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

The game is among the 722 manuscripts for some
reasons. Its among the Lean formulations. And
OpenAI has even fleshed out a big Lean library

for all their Tensor juggling. The 722
manuscripts originally annouced here:

First look at mathematics manuscripts
from an internal frontier model at OpenAI
https://community.openai.com/t/1403886

The game was given a GUI here. But this time
Claude Opus heavily drove this work:

OpenAI’s 21-move one, though their strategy
closed the last three positions my search hadn’t
https://snaky.gotrevor.org/

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> How it started:
> 
> The Experts Were Wrong About AI. Again.
> Kapitel 3: The history of underestimation
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdwFncdu8t0
> 
> How its going:
> 
> OpenAI hat hunderte mathematische Beweise veröffentlicht
> DorFuchs analysiert die neuen mathematischen Forschungsbeiträge
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EawyShKuCY
> 
> BTW: Its 722 manuscripts in 372 families.
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > There's a larger project called FALSE (Formalising
>  > Arithmetic in the Lean Software Environment)
>  > explicitly aimed at "making progress towards
>  >   formalising the Langlands program" . And a
>  >
>  > Twitter thread claims Claude autoformalized
>  > the Fermat proof "in just 11 days," with Kevin
>  > Buzzard now wanting to formalize the Langlands
>  > program because he's "concerned it might
>  > contain subtle errors"
>  >
>  > Now look at this:
>  >
>  > https://github.com/fukubillueda-web/epsilon_FML
>  >
>  > https://github.com/fukubillueda-web/epsilon_SML
>  >
>  > According to the related arvix paper:
>  >
>  > So the provenance chain is: Dwork (attributed,
>  > unpublished) → Langlands (used it) → Lakkis (partial
>  > proof, sign issue) → Ueda (completes it, 2026). That's
>  > the "mixtape" you're looking for — the mathematical
>  > content passed through at least three hands before
>  > Ueda's Lean formalization.
>  >
>  > And then: "OpenAI ChatGPT was used extensively in
>  > the development of this proof." The paper says ChatGPT
>  > was used "to check calculations and compare them with
>  > the arguments of Dwork, Langlands, and Lakkis, and
>  > detect inconsistencies in intermediate versions of
>  > the proof."
>  >
>  > The author "checked the final mathematical
>  > arguments and assumes responsibility."
>  >
>  > Bye

Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Dark Math Factories Interpret the Infinite! (Re: Hyperspectral Measurements for Inter-Calibration) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-10-02 18:43 +0200
  So it was a race against Buzzard. Well done! [Langlands FML and SML] (Re: Dark Math Factories Interpret the Infinite!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-10-03 01:39 +0200
    Math is the premier AI Victim [Billions of $USD later] (Re: So it was a race against Buzzard. Well done! [Langlands FML and SML]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-10-08 13:12 +0200
      Play Snaky, who did it better OpenAI or Anthropic? (Re: Math is the premier AI Victim [Billions of $USD later]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-10-08 23:37 +0200
        Re: Play Snaky, who did it better OpenAI or Anthropic? (Re: Math is the premier AI Victim [Billions of $USD later]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-10-08 23:38 +0200
    Lean 4: That golden era of logic is gone (Re: So it was a race against Buzzard. Well done!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-10-15 12:13 +0200
    Math AI Vegans hate the Druids Cauldron [MakazhanAlpamys / Soup] (Was: So it was a race against Buzzard. Well done!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-11-11 00:29 +0100
  Superintelligenz ist auch F.U.D. (OAI:The-irrationality-exponent-of-pi-is-2-September-24-2026) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-10-10 00:36 +0200
  Avoiding logical strength in real analysis [Lattice Games] (Re: Dark Math Factories Interpret the Infinite!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-10-15 17:39 +0200
    Re: Avoiding logical strength in real analysis [Lattice Games] (Re: Dark Math Factories Interpret the Infinite!) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 11:43 -0700
      Re: Avoiding logical strength in real analysis [Lattice Games] (Re: Dark Math Factories Interpret the Infinite!) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 12:59 -0700

csiph-web