Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem.

From	The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem.
Date	2026-10-04 18:58 +0100
Organization	A little, after lunch
Message-ID	<119u440$4v1d$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <119tgru$2kbjn$2@news.xmission.com> <nif1fhF1toqU4@mid.individual.net> <119tmoa$2kovh$1@news.xmission.com> <119u12s$3glq$1@dont-email.me> <nifgrdF5jmcU3@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 04/10/2026 18:31, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> On 2026-10-04 19:06, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 04/10/2026 15:10, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>> Remember, this whole issue is simply one of there being a very well 
>>> known
>>> bug in the old version(s) of scp/rsync, that is fixed in current 
>>> versions.
>>>
>>> So, really, nothing to see here.
>> which is why I NFS crossmount my machines and used the GUI
>>
> 
> sshfs and mc
> 
No one is snooping my networks.

-- 
“Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.”

H.L. Mencken, A Mencken Chrestomathy

Thread

Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-10-03 10:23 +0000
  Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 11:50 +0100
  Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-03 11:00 +0000
    Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-03 11:08 +0000
    Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 16:01 +0100
      Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-10-03 17:51 +0000
      Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-04 10:59 +0000
        Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-10-04 12:28 +0000
  Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-10-03 13:06 +0000
    Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 16:04 +0100
  Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 15:58 +0100
  Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 23:23 -0400
  Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 12:46 +0200
    Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-10-04 12:29 +0000
      Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 15:09 +0200
        Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-10-04 14:10 +0000
          Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:06 +0100
            Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:31 +0200
              Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:58 +0100
                Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:31 +0200
      Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:37 -0400
        Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 09:05 +0100
          Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-10-05 17:52 +0000
    Re: Another interesting (?) scp/rsync problem. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-10-05 02:31 +0000

csiph-web