Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #401858
| From | fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: c needs this sign |
| Date | 2026-09-10 01:09 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <117sov6$1i4sm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <117r6it$3r5qn$5@dont-email.me> <117sksi$1gtrk$1@dont-email.me> <117sl5f$1h1ed$1@dont-email.me> <117sngv$1hnm2$1@dont-email.me> <117so46$1ht22$1@dont-email.me> |
fir pisze: > bart pisze: >> On 09/09/2026 23:04, fir wrote: >>> fir pisze: >>>> Janis Papanagnou pisze: >>>> >>>>> Concerning the "Colon equals" '≔' I mentioned, I mean, why not just >>>>> use ':=' as usual. The Unicode symbol adds nothing and costs a lot! >>>>> >>>> >>>> this one is in fact quite nice, and practically could be used as is imo >>>> >>>> char* txt ≔ "skjnskjns"; >>>> char* txt = "skjnskjns"; >>>> >>>> its maybe even better looking than oryginal = but this probably >>>> depends on font..but from this mentioned it seem the best as for now >>>> >>>> >>>> a ≔ b=3 //would mean assign true to a if b=3 >>>> >>>> a=b≔3 //this would mean assign b to 3 andcheck if a=3 >>>> >>>> >>>> hovver im not quite convinced if thise logical 'hypothesis' >>>> should be cast to arithmetic (maybe yes maybe not i dont know) >>>> >>>> if hypothesis not casted it could mean that if would no need >>>> oparators at all maybe just syntax >>>> >>>> hypothesis statement >>>> >>>> like >>>> >>>> a<4 print "ssasa" >>>> >>>> 0<x<size x ≔ rand() >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> overally good one >>> >>> i may announce >>> >>> AS FOR NOW ≔ IS A WINNER (applause) >>> >> >> So, what happens now? >> >> Do you implement this in your enhanced version of C, or in a new >> language (hard)? >> >> Or persuade someone else to add it to C or some other mainstream >> language (magnitudes harder)? >> >> Personally I find it near impossible to see, and near impossible to >> type. Still, I added it to my language (which already uses :=) to see >> how it works: >> >> a := 10 >> b ≔ 20 >> c := 30 >> > (...) > as to visibility i think its only dependant on which font you use > for example notepad uses consolas and in this font its look quite good > for me (as i said imo better than oryginal = ) > > it may be matter of taste , becouse if you like c := 30 you seem to have different taste than i ;c becouse for me its not standable for this two in c = and == the set ≔ and = is much better but as i said it very much must depend on font i guess (i wouldnt also consider ≔ as a final choice for assigment but for now as for replace in traditional c is best i seen as for the moment i myself condider in fact two langueges one is slightly improved c (close to traditional c) and one is maybe yet more radically improved c and in the second i could maybe search for something more futuristic as assigment, i dont know yet but for traditional i may repeat ≔ = much better than = == andmuch better than := =
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-07 15:53 +0200
Re: c needs this sign David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> - 2026-09-07 19:21 +0000
Re: c needs this sign Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-09-08 01:10 +0200
Re: c needs this sign Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2026-09-07 23:13 +0000
Re: c needs this sign Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-07 17:26 -0600
Re: c needs this sign David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-09-08 10:40 +0200
Re: c needs this sign Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-09-09 10:49 +0200
Re: c needs this sign David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-09-09 13:21 +0200
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 13:33 +0200
Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-09-09 21:37 +0200
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-09-10 09:01 +0200
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-09-10 23:13 +0200
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-09-10 22:17 +0000
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 15:48 -0700
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-09-11 10:51 +0100
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-09-11 12:49 +0200
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-09-11 16:28 +0000
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-09-11 02:03 +0200
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 17:13 -0700
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-09-11 02:24 +0200
Re: Support of Unicode characters in various places (was Re: c needs this sign) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-09-11 09:42 +0200
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 23:59 +0200
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 00:04 +0200
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 00:16 +0200
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 00:30 +0200
Re: c needs this sign bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-09-09 23:44 +0100
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 00:55 +0200
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 01:09 +0200
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 01:21 +0200
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 01:36 +0200
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 01:45 +0200
Re: c needs this sign Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-15 07:23 +0000
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 11:56 +0200
Re: c needs this sign bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-09-08 11:14 +0100
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 12:28 +0200
Re: c needs this sign Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 03:54 -0700
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 13:13 +0200
= vs. == (again!) (Was: c needs this sign) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-09-08 14:39 +0000
Re: = vs. == (again!) (Was: c needs this sign) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-10-14 23:36 -0700
Re: c needs this sign Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-09-09 11:13 +0200
Re: c needs this sign Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-09 00:29 +0000
Re: c needs this sign "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 13:42 -0700
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 15:12 +0200
Re: c needs this sign Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-08 03:33 +0000
Re: c needs this sign fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 12:02 +0200
Re: c needs this sign Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-09 00:27 +0000
csiph-web