Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #34064
| From | "....winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.microsoft.windows |
| Subject | Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? |
| Date | 2026-08-27 12:38 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <116pp6j$1kkob$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <116n9nb$2hss$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <116ni78$ui00$1@dont-email.me> <116o3de$13gjm$1@dont-email.me> <6245mmxe7e.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 08/27/2026 3:03 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2026-08-27 03:20, Paul wrote: >> You can run them locally, but you have to be patient. For one request >> to write a program, and with high reasoning enabled, it took 50 minutes >> to half-write the program. The high reasoning took about eight minutes >> of that, and the vast majority of the time was spent on token output. >> >> They tell me it would use a video card for token output,*if* the question >> fits entirely within the video card. But with my puny hardware >> resources, it >> always uses the CPU for token output, which can be slow. > > There is a chip that can accelerate the ai more than gpus. I read about > it in the ieee spectrum magazine, but I don't remember the name of the > thing. Laptops will come with that hardware so they can handle ai > locally with reasonable battery usage. > > probably asking an ai about this it will tell better details than me :-D > Iirc, NPU - neural processing unit ASIC - app specific - i.e. for a specific AI task Also another older type of chip/circuitry based on gate array(?) and re-programmable. -- ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-26 12:02 -0600
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2026-08-26 16:27 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-26 21:20 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-26 19:32 -0600
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-27 09:03 +0200
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-27 05:41 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? "....winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2026-08-27 12:38 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-27 14:31 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-27 23:15 +0200
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-29 20:49 +0100
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-29 16:38 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-29 22:43 +0100
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-30 01:27 -0400
Re: MS Edge was never useful but at least it had worked for Copilot but what AI/LLM now? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-08-26 19:32 -0600
csiph-web