Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #401309

Re: this girl calls c ugly

Show all headers | View raw

In article <115r09e$3qb10$1@kst.eternal-september.org>,
Keith Thompson  <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
>Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
>> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> The text of the standard explicitly carves this out;  or, rather,
>>>> it attempts to.  If the result of an expression is not
>>>> representable in the target type, _regardless of whether that's
>>>> due to UB or not_, a diagnostic is required.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> How would an expression (appearing in a context that requires an
>>> integer constant expression) not "evaluate to a constant that is in
>>> the range of representable values for its type" other than by UB?
>>
>> I can think of one.
>
>So you've decided to be a troll.

I think it's been that way for a while, sadly.

His MO seems to be to make a claim, be shown to be wrong,
disappear for an extended stretch, and then reappear with a
non-response.

	- Dan C.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: this girl calls c ugly Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-08-15 09:37 -0700
  Re: this girl calls c ugly Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-08-15 17:29 -0700
    Re: this girl calls c ugly cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-08-18 20:30 +0000

csiph-web