Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #400917

What are Flits and Phits? [Network on a Chip] (Re: GPU Elasticity: Collective Communications Libraries)

From Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c, comp.lang.lisp, comp.theory
Subject What are Flits and Phits? [Network on a Chip] (Re: GPU Elasticity: Collective Communications Libraries)
Date 2026-08-07 18:07 +0200
Message-ID <1154vsi$2mto$3@solani.org> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <114pqg5$17lne$1@dont-email.me> <5T_bS.71191$4Fu9.56234@fx05.ams4> <114qei6$t1uc$1@solani.org> <114qerq$t244$1@solani.org> <1154jip$296j$3@solani.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

Recently there was a paper somebody mentioning
a flit doing a ACK or NACK, to express
backpressure inside a Network on a Chip.

But what is a flit? It seems multiple
flits can be used to create the message
passing in one directiob before the

ACK or NACK in the other direction?

"The growing need for performance from
computing systems drove the industry into
the multi-core and many-core arena. In this
setup, the execution of a kernel (a program)
is split across multiple processors and the
computation happens in parallel

Flits represent logical units of information,
while phits represent the physical domain,
that is, phits represent the number of bits
that can be transferred in parallel in a
single cycle. Consider the Cray T3D. It has
an interconnection network which uses

flit level message flow control wherein each
flit is composed of eight 16-bit phits. That
means its flit size is 128bits and phit size
is 16bits. Also consider the IBM SP2 switch.
It also uses the flit level message flow
control, but its flit size is equal to its
phit size, which is set to 8 bits."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flit_(computer_networking)#Example

Well my idea how this is realized in silicon
is rather foggy, I mean even the Hack project
from Nand 2 Tetris, does not show some gate level
schemes for flits and phits.

Could be an interesting extension. But somehow
the image of flits and phits inspired my channel
objects here below. But I am afraid they are fire
and forget, no ACK and NACK:

π-WAM Contest: 1 Million Packets with Prolog
https://medium.com/2989/ec3e91551773

Its amazing that a max_size(1) buffer
can beat an unbounded buffer!

LoL

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> How it started, NVIDIA being cool:
> 
> NCCL provides routines such as all-gather,
> all-reduce, broadcast, reduce, reduce-scatter,
> and point-to-point send and receive. These
> routines are optimized to achieve high
> bandwidth and low latency over PCIe,
> NVIDIA NVLink™, and other high-speed
> interconnects within a node and over
> NVIDIA networking across nodes.
> https://developer.nvidia.com/nccl
> 
> How its going, vLLM trying to be cool:
> 
> [RFC]: Native Weight Syncing APIs
> However, there are no standardized methods for
> performing online weight syncing. Open source projects
> like SkyRL, VeRL, and TRL need to include their
> own implementations of the weight syncing
> infrastructure, leading to added complexity
> for developers seeking to adopt vLLM as their
> inference server for post-training workloads.
> https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/31848
> 
> How much Workers are enough? I guess it depends
> on I/O parallelism, CPU Memory parallelism, CPU
> Processing parallelism, and now also
> 
> GPU Memory parallelism and GPU Processing
> parallelism, and last but least you might have
> a couple DMAs sitting here and there,
> 
> or even invoking a sort of RDMA. Quite amazing!
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Well there are two viewpoint, the "client"
>> of the GPU, which is the CPU, and the "server"
>> of the GPU, which is the command processor
>>
>> queue of the GPU device. So basically as
>> a CPU client I can write the memory area,
>> that is later mapped to my GPU code storage.
>>
>> And this way have a compiler, even written
>> in Prolog, that compiles pi-WAM to my Hack VM,
>> that can then be then deployed to GPU.
>>
>> You could also try the same with a Tiny
>> LISP VM. And a grown up LISP to act as
>> the compiler. Would be a similar exercise.
>>
>> Have Fun!
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>  > I've also added comp.theory so Mild Shock can comment.
>>>
>>>  > that has different
>>>  > *  sizeof ( void * ), and
>>>  > *  sizeof ( void (*)( void ) ),
>>>
>>> Could indicate a data RAM and code ROM model.
>>> Which has then the advantage of:
>>>
>>> Modern operating systems like Windows 11
>>> enforce strict Data Execution Prevention (DEP)
>>> (or NX/XD bit security features) to prevent
>>> malicious programs from injecting and executing
>>> code inside data-only memory regions.
>>> https://root-nation.com/en/soft-en/lifehacks/en-dep-windows-all-about/
>>>
>>> I adopted data RAM and code ROM model for
>>> pi-WAM from Hack, which has the same separation:
>>>
>>> Slide 58, Hack Computer
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z_fxYmmRNXTkAzmZ6YMoX9NXZIRVCKiw/view
>>>
>>> But my motivation was not Johnny Depp prevention.
>>> Rather the caching of GPUs. Because WGSL
>>> allows storage annotations read_write and
>>>
>>> read. I use read_write for the data RAM
>>> of my Hack VM variant, and read for the
>>> code ROM of my Hack VM variant. You can
>>>
>>> see that here, its open source:
>>>
>>> @group(0) @binding(0) var<storage, read> code: array<i32>;
>>> @group(0) @binding(1) var<storage, read_write> state: array<i32>;
>>>
>>> 11.4 Giga Lips with a Budget Laptop
>>> https://github.com/Jean-Luc-Picard-2021/gigabudget
>>>
>>> Hope this Helps!
>>>
>>> Bye
>>>
>>> Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson schrieb:
>>>> On 03/08/2026 6:28 PM, David Brown wrote:
>>>>> On 03/08/2026 11:41, Richard Harnden wrote:
>>>>>> On 03/08/2026 09:16, David Brown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On most targets, function pointers are the same size as void* 
>>>>>>> pointers. But there are exceptions, with some small 
>>>>>>> microcontrollers and DSPs having different kinds of pointers with 
>>>>>>> different sizes, depending on the memory space involved.  I have 
>>>>>>> yet to see a situation where there was any reason for storing a 
>>>>>>> function address in a "void*" rather than a more appropriate 
>>>>>>> typedef, such as :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      typedef void (*FVoid)(void);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dlsym requires that pointer-to-function is compatible with a void*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As I say, I have yet to see a situation where using void* for 
>>>>> function pointers was more appropriate than using a function 
>>>>> pointer type.  If the OS system calls or standard OS libraries 
>>>>> makes it a requirement that function pointers are converted to or 
>>>>> from void* for some calls, then of course you need to follow those 
>>>>> requirements - it's the people who designed the interfaces that 
>>>>> made questionable design choices.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope, you're wrong.  You're dead wrong.  The world isn't built on C,
>>>> even though here in comp.lang.c we like to pretend it is.
>>>>
>>>> Several language environments allow function generation on the fly,
>>>> these functions need to be garbage collected.  Common Lisp is an
>>>> example, therefore comp.lang.lisp is added to this discussion.
>>>>
>>>> I've also added comp.theory so Mild Shock can comment.
>>>>
>>>> You will have to go out of your way to make a computer architecture
>>>> incompatible with garbage collected and heap allocated binary code,
>>>> something I've been told SBCL does internally [1] to create an archi-
>>>> tecture that has different
>>>>
>>>> *  sizeof ( void * ), and
>>>> *  sizeof ( void (*)( void ) ),
>>>>
>>>> and when you do that, I'll just claim you're making a /malicious
>>>> computer architecture/ and refuse to use it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] I've not looked at the code, but told the garbage collector can
>>>> and will at least move the code around, if not collect it.
>>>
>>
>

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Prioritize Performance over Correctness Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-07-22 01:38 +0200
  Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-21 17:26 -0700
    Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-22 01:50 +0000
      Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-21 20:25 -0700
        Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-22 17:37 +0000
      Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-22 13:26 -0700
    Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-07-22 07:33 +0200
      Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-07-22 10:41 +0200
        Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-07-22 18:08 -0500
          Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-07-23 10:31 +0200
            Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-23 14:31 -0700
              Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-23 14:48 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-23 15:11 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-07-24 09:23 +0200
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-24 03:14 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-07-24 14:56 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-07-25 16:30 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-07-27 09:33 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-28 00:22 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-27 12:58 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-07-27 15:37 -0500
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-07-27 17:13 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-27 15:17 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-07-28 01:18 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-28 15:40 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-28 14:18 +0000
                Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-28 22:48 +0800
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-07-28 15:08 +0000
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-28 23:30 +0800
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-28 19:08 +0000
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-29 04:08 +0800
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-28 22:15 +0000
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-28 22:26 +0000
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-29 06:41 +0800
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-28 23:23 +0000
                Picture of Organicks' book Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-29 16:01 +0800
                Re: Picture of Organicks' book cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-29 13:46 +0000
                Re: Picture of Organicks' book R Kym Horsell <kymhorsell@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 16:54 +0000
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-07-29 23:22 +0000
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-08-15 15:55 -0700
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-28 18:58 +0000
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-29 04:10 +0800
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-28 22:20 +0000
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-07-29 14:44 +0000
                Re: Multics( Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-30 02:08 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-08-16 07:59 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-27 17:59 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-28 15:42 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-28 03:22 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-28 19:21 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-07-28 13:02 +0100
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-28 20:18 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-07-28 14:17 +0100
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-07-28 16:02 -0500
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-29 16:45 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-07-29 12:03 +0100
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-29 19:32 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-07-29 13:42 +0100
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-29 20:49 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-07-29 16:01 +0100
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 12:53 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-07-31 14:21 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-07-31 20:07 +0100
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-31 13:00 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Correctness Over Performance Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-01 02:34 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-28 16:08 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-28 23:28 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-28 14:22 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-28 13:51 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-07-28 20:32 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-28 14:20 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-28 13:54 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-29 05:00 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-07-28 20:25 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 14:55 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-07-28 20:31 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-28 21:26 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 14:57 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 15:33 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 16:22 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2026-07-30 07:40 +0100
                Re: Prioritize Correctness over Performance Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-30 06:48 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Correctness over Performance James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-07-30 06:50 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Correctness over Performance Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 03:54 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Correctness over Performance James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-07-30 08:24 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Correctness over Performance Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 14:40 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Correctness over Performance "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 19:39 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-07-30 06:44 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-30 21:00 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 14:38 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-30 21:53 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 15:10 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 19:40 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-31 02:43 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 19:44 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 19:58 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-01 01:25 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-08-02 23:14 +0200
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-02 14:37 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-02 22:51 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-08-02 16:43 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-03 12:03 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Correctness Over Performance Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-03 23:49 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Correctness Over Performance "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-03 19:35 -0700
                MS-DOS memory models (was: Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-03 08:08 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-08-03 10:16 +0200
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2026-08-03 10:41 +0100
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-08-03 12:28 +0200
                Malicious Computer Architecture (was: Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-03 19:23 +0800
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-08-03 14:01 +0200
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-03 22:52 +0800
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-08-03 19:41 +0200
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-03 13:13 -0700
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-03 13:10 -0700
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture (was: Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-08-03 14:29 +0000
                Johnny Depp prevention [Windows 11 etc...] (Was: Malicious Computer Architecture) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-03 18:10 +0200
                But how can you deploy. when its ROM? (Was: Johnny Depp prevention [Windows 11 etc...]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-03 18:15 +0200
                GPU Elasticity: Collective Communications Libraries (Was: But how can you deploy. when its ROM?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-07 14:37 +0200
                What are Flits and Phits? [Network on a Chip] (Re: GPU Elasticity: Collective Communications Libraries) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-07 18:07 +0200
                Cristallina: Thank you for the Beam (Re: What are Flits and Phits? [Network on a Chip]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-09 21:22 +0200
                Loderunner Enemy AI better than SWI-Prolog? [Prolog Education Group] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-18 16:26 +0200
                How to shoot yourself in the foot (Re: Loderunner Enemy AI better than SWI-Prolog? [Prolog Education Group] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-18 16:50 +0200
                Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot (Re: Loderunner Enemy AI better than SWI-Prolog? [Prolog Education Group] Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-19 03:24 +0800
                Re: Loderunner Enemy AI better than SWI-Prolog? [Prolog Education Group] Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-19 03:21 +0800
                Re: Loderunner Enemy AI better than SWI-Prolog? [Prolog Education Group] Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> - 2026-08-18 21:13 +0100
                Re: Loderunner Enemy AI better than SWI-Prolog? [Prolog Education Group] Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-18 22:49 +0000
                Re: Loderunner Enemy AI better than SWI-Prolog? [Prolog Education Group] Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-19 08:32 +0800
                Re: Loderunner Enemy AI better than SWI-Prolog? [Prolog Education Group] Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-19 08:27 +0800
                The Mac Neo is a Budget Monster [GPU Channels] (Re: What are Flits and Phits? [Network on a Chip]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-11 16:27 +0200
                The luminaries of duct-tape engineering [Sweeney and Torvald] (Was: The Mac Neo is a Budget Monster [GPU Channels]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-11 16:51 +0200
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> - 2026-08-03 19:51 +0100
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-05 00:22 +0800
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2026-08-04 19:10 +0100
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-05 03:21 +0800
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2026-08-06 21:55 +0000
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-08-07 06:31 +0800
                Re: Malicious Computer Architecture Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> - 2026-08-06 23:01 +0100
                A Case for Impurity: The Applied Pi Calculus (Re: Malicious Computer Architecture) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-04 14:58 +0200
                The Sandcastle of Paul Taraus Interactors (Re: A Case for Impurity: The Applied Pi Calculus) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-04 15:10 +0200
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-08-03 05:34 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-03 13:04 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Correctness Over Performance Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-04 00:52 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Correctness Over Performance scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-08-04 14:22 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-08-03 05:25 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-08-03 15:10 +0200
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-08-03 13:16 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-08-03 20:29 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-08-03 17:55 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-08-04 09:12 +0200
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-08-02 19:01 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-08-03 19:59 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 03:50 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 15:09 -0700
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-28 08:14 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-29 05:54 +0800
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness steveo@panix.com (Steven M. O'Neill) - 2026-07-31 20:34 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-07-28 19:40 -0400
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-07-27 15:36 -0500
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-29 04:56 +0800
              Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-07-24 14:47 +0200
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-07-24 16:27 +0200
                Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-25 00:52 +0800
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-07-24 23:08 +0100
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-07-24 18:50 -0500
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-25 01:54 +0000
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-25 15:20 +0800
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-25 07:24 +0000
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-25 15:30 +0800
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-07-25 10:37 +0200
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-27 00:35 +0800
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-07-26 12:39 -0500
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2026-07-26 22:27 +0100
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-07-26 18:02 -0500
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-25 22:32 +0000
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-25 15:58 -0700
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-07-25 10:23 +0200
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-24 16:29 -0700
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-25 15:25 +0800
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-25 15:33 -0700
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-07-27 00:38 +0800
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-26 17:06 -0700
                Re: Resources for Amateur Compiler Writers Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-07-26 17:03 +0000
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-07-24 16:50 -0500
                Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-07-24 16:13 -0700
            Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-07-26 15:26 -0500
        Re: Prioritize Performance over Correctness Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2026-07-23 11:18 +0200

csiph-web