Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #21643
| From | Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.thunderbird |
| Subject | Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... |
| Date | 2026-08-01 14:16 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <114ld5c$3qt3e$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <114g5me$21p2m$1@dont-email.me> <114gl4b$27abm$1@dont-email.me> <114h17d$2ar5p$1@dont-email.me> <114iqm2$3055k$1@dont-email.me> <114kv8p$3lc0r$1@dont-email.me> |
On Sat, 8/1/2026 10:19 AM, The Real Bev wrote: > This is so info-dense that I have saved it for later. I have ~400GB empty on my main drive, but mental effort is problematical :-( > > The idea of having my own AI is novel. I am ashamed of having become so dependent on the AIs for information that I formerly googled, but I am unable to resist the temptation. Being able to emulate Captain Picard (typing, not voice; my computer has no eyes or ears) is seductive. > I'm not good at this stuff, but the latest attempt suggests the smallest models may be too weak. Since something like three million people had downloaded the small one (E4B), I figured there must be some evidence that one was worthwhile. The bigger one seems braver about how it runs its business, and does not run away from a job quite as easily. And then it becomes a question of how much system RAM have you got. Gemma 31B wrote a program as an output, whereas Gemma E4B merely sketched an outline with "comment statements". And an even larger model found a cheat for itself, to "save itself from writing 200 lines of code". How heroic. 16GB of RAM would handle the 7GB or so Gemma E4B needs (a bit weak model). 64GB of RAM would handle the 35GB or so Gemma 31B needed. 128GB of RAM would handle the 80GB the OpenAi 120B needed. Look at both how much RAM and how much disk space. The OS installation with Gemma 31B on it, there is only 7GB left on the C: drive, as it wasn't sized for this sort of thing. And there is a model format which is more efficient and still works. But they have only released one model that way, and the industry knows now, how to make a smaller one. They release FP4 and FP16 models, because video cards accelerate that, but the smallest model is the TRIT [-1,0,1 ] which is harder for them but easier for us. TRIT works best if trained as a TRIT, not quantized from a larger format. Whereas other models in the list in LMStudio, are quantized from larger models. The offerings of Kimi could be like that (the largest model being impossibly big, have to buy a $100K computer, good for Bill Gates home computer). Paul
Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-07-30 19:38 +0100
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-30 16:01 -0700
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 19:27 -0700
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-07-31 09:10 +0100
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... dillinger <dillinger@not.invalid> - 2026-07-31 11:45 +0200
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... MikeS <MikeS@fred.com> - 2026-07-31 11:56 +0100
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-31 11:53 -0700
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-31 15:29 -0400
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-02 02:05 -0700
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-31 10:59 -0400
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-31 14:48 -0400
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-08-01 07:19 -0700
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-01 14:16 -0400
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2026-08-01 18:38 -0700
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-31 15:03 +0200
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-31 12:37 -0700
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-30 16:20 -0700
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> - 2026-07-31 10:48 -0400
Re: "Don't mess with that which you don't understand" ... "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-07-31 21:45 +0100
csiph-web