Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #15636
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Parallel π-WAM: 1.7 Giga Lips on a CPU (Was: Dogelog Player: 11.4 Giga Lips with a Budget Laptop) |
| Date | 2026-07-15 18:08 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1138bah$58mb$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <112jcsp$5860$1@solani.org> <112lug9$75rr$1@solani.org> |
Hi, We recently implemented a parallel π-WAM on a GPU backend and could demonstrate an estimated 11.4 Giga Lips. In this post we report a further experiment, this time presenting a parallel π-WAM on a CPU backend, that can lift specialized Prolog, currently to 1.7 Giga Lips performance. Having an excess number of threads is a bad idea. What if we do context switching on our own? With this approach we could bring down the execution time of 128 Hack VMs by 33%. We estimate for the test which had 11.4 GLips on the GPU, that we reach 1.7 GLips on the CPU. Bye See also: Parallel π-WAM: 1.7 Giga Lips on a CPU https://medium.com/2989/8a984e75af44 Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > At the end of 2025 we acquired a couple of AI > Laptops , that were still cheap, since RAM prices > had not yet rocketed. The intend was to tap into > the Copilot+ certified hardware, and shave off > some of the TOPS to do Prolog inferencing. Amazingly > our π-WAM can churn 11.4 GIGA LIPS. > > GPUs have evolved form lock-step to independent > thread scheduling. This made it possible to port > the Hack VM variant, that forms the basis for > our π-WAM, to WebGPU computer shaders. Using > NUM_SHADERS = 4096 we could produce 11.4 Giga Lips > on a Ryzen AI 7 350 w/ Radeon 860M. > > Bye > > See also: > > Dogelog Player: 11.4 Giga Lips with a Budget Laptop > https://medium.com/2989/899b0d5c027b > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Dear All, >> >> We are happy to announce a new edition of >> the Dogelog Player: >> >> - Unicode 17.0: >> We lifted the Dogelog Player for Java build >> to JDK 26 and regenerated our Unicode database >> for category and number value for the JavaScript >> and Python build. The supported version is now >> 17.0 and we managed somehow to reduce the footprint >> from 16848 words to 15000 words. >> >> - Emulating π-WAM: >> The new library(edge/brainfog) permits the >> execution of certain Prolog goals in a π-WAM >> backend. The concept of a π-WAM embraces a >> fusion of a processs (π) calculus and a Warren >> Abstract Machine (WAM). Optimized for speed the >> WAM is very primitive and currently only supports >> the ‘$SEQ’/2 control construct, plus rudimentary >> 32-bit integer arithmetic and between/3. >> >> - Executing π-WAM: >> Both emulate/1 and execute/1 compile into an >> identical instruction stream. In the virtual >> machine the instructions are 32-bit inspired by >> combinations of the 16-bit A and C instructions >> from the original Hack. The resulting π-WAM >> currently doesn’t support a stack, a trail >> or choice points but can nevertheless >> do backtracking. >> >> Have Fun! >> >> Jan Burse, July 07, 2026, https://www.herbrand.ai/ >
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ANN: Dogelog Player 2.2.3 (Introducing π-WAM) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-07 19:26 +0200
Dogelog Player: 11.4 Giga Lips with a Budget Laptop (Re: ANN: Dogelog Player 2.2.3 (Introducing π-WAM)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-08 18:39 +0200
Parallel π-WAM: 1.7 Giga Lips on a CPU (Was: Dogelog Player: 11.4 Giga Lips with a Budget Laptop) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-15 18:08 +0200
Parallel π-WAM: JavaScript Workers as CPU Backend (Was: Parallel π-WAM: 1.7 Giga Lips on a CPU) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-20 18:50 +0200
Parallel π-WAM: An Interleaved Synchronous Emulator (Re: Parallel π-WAM: JavaScript Workers as CPU Backend) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-25 03:51 +0200
csiph-web