Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.logic, sci.math, comp.theory |
| Subject | Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked |
| Date | 2026-07-15 11:11 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1137irk$129ir$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <1133181$3n00p$1@dont-email.me> <1134nf4$6l06$1@dont-email.me> <1135uij$jkp7$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Op 14.jul.2026 om 20:18 schreef olcott: > On 7/14/2026 2:11 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 13/07/2026 18:46, olcott wrote: >>> All undecidability is unmasked as semantic >>> incoherence or outside of the body of knowledge. >> >> The sentence "Olcott's system is correct" would > > be rejected as pathological. Olcott has confirmed that he thinks that A is true. Now he says that Olcott's system will reject this finite string A, because of a self-reference. According to the system, A has no truth value. So, Olcott and his system disagree about the truth value of A. Olcott claims that his system will convince everybody about the truth. We now see ourselves confronted with the ultimate test of the strength of Olcott's system: Is the system strong enough to make Olcott change his opinion about A? Will he accept that we cannot prove that A is true? If no. If even Olcott himself does not accept the output of his own system, why would we believe that anybody else will accept it? If yes. If Olcott accepts that we cannot say that A is true, i.e. that his system is correct, why would anyone change his opinion because of the output of a system of which the correctness cannot be proven?
Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 10:46 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-14 10:11 +0300
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 13:18 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2026-07-15 11:11 +0200
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 09:56 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2026-07-16 11:01 +0200
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2026-07-18 12:02 +0200
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2026-07-18 20:07 +0100
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-14 12:12 +0300
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 14:41 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-14 13:48 -0600
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 15:01 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-14 14:30 -0600
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 15:42 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-14 15:06 -0600
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 16:14 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-14 15:34 -0600
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-18 13:48 +0100
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-14 19:57 +0000
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 15:16 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 16:18 -0400
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 10:35 +0300
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 10:31 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 12:16 +0300
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-18 14:17 +0100
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 10:25 +0300
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 10:14 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-15 20:18 +0100
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 14:44 -0500
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-18 19:21 +0100
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-18 19:21 +0100
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 09:11 +0300
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-18 12:30 +0100
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-19 11:55 +0300
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-19 10:49 +0100
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-20 10:54 +0300
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-21 13:31 +0100
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-21 08:43 -0700
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-22 09:58 +0300
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 15:24 -0400
Re: ALL undecidability is unmasked Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 12:23 +0300
csiph-web