Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #142789
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Olcott's system |
| Date | 2026-07-12 16:40 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <11311ka$3541o$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <1130tbc$32s2u$4@dont-email.me> <1130v1i$34c58$1@dont-email.me> <1130ve9$32s2u$5@dont-email.me> <11310gg$34ql2$1@dont-email.me> <11310ro$32s2u$6@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 7/12/2026 4:27 PM, dbush wrote: > On 7/12/2026 5:21 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 7/12/2026 4:03 PM, dbush wrote: >>> On 7/12/2026 4:56 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 7/12/2026 3:27 PM, dbush wrote: >>>>> On 7/12/2026 4:15 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> On 7/12/2026 3:04 PM, dbush wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/12/2026 4:02 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/12/2026 2:25 PM, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-12 12:57, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/12/2026 1:49 PM, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-12 12:00, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/12/2026 12:29 PM, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-12 10:51, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/12/2026 11:38 AM, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-12 08:15, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/12/2026 3:11 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I am correct Olcott wants to build a system such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it will convince everybody of the truth. E.g. he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinks that he will be able to prove that the 'Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sentence'" 'Trump lost the elections in 2020 because of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud' is not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few questions: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) How many petabytes of basic-facts and rules does he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to construct his proof? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Given that even after 20 years he did not convince >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone about the correctness of one 'basic fact', how >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many peta- years do you think he needs to convince a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believer of the Trump sentence that all his basic facts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and rules are correct? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) How is Olcott going to prove that his system is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct? His system is not able to prove its own >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correctness, because of a self- reference. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This aspect can be implemented manually by carefully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> searching for the answer to this one question: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Was there any actual evidence of election fraud >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that could have possibly change the outcome of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2020 presidential election? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Empirical questions cannot be proven in the sense used by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logicians. They can be supported but not proven. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this case it can. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that you believe this simply reinforces my point: >>>>>>>>>>>>> You have a *very* different definition of proof than the >>>>>>>>>>>>> one used by logicians. It's usually clear from your posts >>>>>>>>>>>>> that you have very different definitions of many things >>>>>>>>>>>>> which is why people keep pressing you for your definition >>>>>>>>>>>>> of these terms. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The utter and complete failure to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> produce any actual evidence by anyone ever conclusively >>>>>>>>>>>>>> proves that the claim has no supporting basis thus is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> baseless. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes of course that is perfectly true. >>>>>>>>>>>> On the other hand the absence of evidence within >>>>>>>>>>>> the claim of evidence proves a lie. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No. It demonstrates that he has not provided evidence. It >>>>>>>>>>> doesn't prove anything one way or another. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The fact that no evidence exists in the entire world >>>>>>>>>> is by itself complete prove that no evidence exists >>>>>>>>>> in the entire world. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There's a big difference between saying that you are unaware of >>>>>>>>> any such evidence or that Trump has failed to supply such >>>>>>>>> evidence and the claim that "no evidence exists in the entire >>>>>>>>> world". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am not saying that dip shit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IT IS A FACT THAT >>>>>>>> There is no actual evidence in the whole world >>>>>>>> of any election fraud at all that could possibly >>>>>>>> change the result of the 2020 presidential election. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IT IS A FACT THAT >>>>>>>> There is no actual evidence in the whole world >>>>>>>> of any election fraud at all that could possibly >>>>>>>> change the result of the 2020 presidential election. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IT IS A FACT THAT >>>>>>>> There is no actual evidence in the whole world >>>>>>>> of any election fraud at all that could possibly >>>>>>>> change the result of the 2020 presidential election. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IT IS A FACT THAT >>>>>>>> There is no actual evidence in the whole world >>>>>>>> of any election fraud at all that could possibly >>>>>>>> change the result of the 2020 presidential election. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where is the evidence of this "fact"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A proof is a an argument in which the conclusion follows from >>>>>>>>>>> the premises, i.e. an argument in which it is logically >>>>>>>>>>> impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to >>>>>>>>>>> be false. Your claim doesn't even remotely resemble that. And >>>>>>>>>>> where empirical claims are concerned there is the additional >>>>>>>>>>> problem that while logic can establish the validity of an >>>>>>>>>>> argument, logic *cannot* actually establish the truth of >>>>>>>>>>> empirical premises. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And once again, this is an empirical matter, not one which >>>>>>>>>>>>> can be resolved using formal logic. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That no one can possibly provide any actual evidence >>>>>>>>>>>> of election fraud that could possibly prove that election >>>>>>>>>>>> fraud changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential proves >>>>>>>>>>>> the absence of evidence, thus the claim is baseless. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Baseless and proven false are two entirely different things. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The fact that no evidence exists in the entire world >>>>>>>>>> is by itself complete prove that no evidence exists >>>>>>>>>> in the entire world. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Except you have no proof that "no evidence exists in the entire >>>>>>>>> world" to offer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The problem is that you seem to be falling back on the *legal* >>>>>>>>> definition of proof, which is very different from the >>>>>>>>> *mathematical* definition of proof; yet you claim to be >>>>>>>>> concerned with the mathematical notion of proof since you seem >>>>>>>>> really bothered by Gödel's claim that there are limits on what >>>>>>>>> can actually be proven. Gödel makes no claims whatsoever about >>>>>>>>> legal proofs, so if all you're concerned about is the legal >>>>>>>>> notion you have no reason to be bothered by Gödel. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> When Mitchell and Laplace first proposed the idea of a black >>>>>>>>>>> hole, they had no evidence that such things existed. But to >>>>>>>>>>> claim that they were therefore proven wrong would simply be >>>>>>>>>>> false. And we now do have evidence that they were correct. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One-two punch Destroys Liars >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #WhatIsTheEvidence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #ThatIsNotEvidence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Around and around until Defeated >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kristen Welker's (Meet the Press) interview of Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She cornered him and he gave up and left proving that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he has no evidence of election fraud. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How on earth would that constitute proof? You obviously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a very idiosyncratic definition of 'proof'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a fact that no such evidence has ever existed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This made his only option to get up and leave in defeat. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> He could have left for any number of reasons. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rational minds that fully know that no actual evidence >>>>>>>>>>>> exists will not equivocate on this point. That you equivocate >>>>>>>>>>>> proves that there is something up with you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't think you know what the word 'equivocate' actually >>>>>>>>>>> means. Where have I equivocated? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Equivocate means to intentionally use vague, ambiguous, >>>>>>>>>> or double-meaning language to conceal the truth, mislead >>>>>>>>>> listeners, or avoid making a definitive commitment. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nowhere did I use vague or ambiguous language or double- >>>>>>>>> meanings to conceal the truth. I simply pointed out that your >>>>>>>>> claims do not actually constitute anything resembling proof on >>>>>>>>> the formal definition of proof. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You keep dodging the fact that there is no actual evidence >>>>>>>>>> of election fraud that could possibly change the outcome >>>>>>>>>> of the 2020 presidential election. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Note that I do not actually believe that there was fraud in the >>>>>>>>> Election, nor do I believe that there is evidence of election >>>>>>>>> irregularities sufficient to support widespread fraud. My claim >>>>>>>>> is simply that this has not actually been *proven*. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is the exact weasel words that keep the dumb fucks >>>>>>>> believing that there was fraud. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In other words, you don't know what "proof" means. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Trump has not met the *legal* burden of proof to support his >>>>>>>>> claims, but that is very different from claiming that the >>>>>>>>> claims have been disproven in the formal sense. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> André >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is no fucking actual evidence in the whole fucking world >>>>>>>> that there was any election fraud at all THAT COULD POSSIBLY >>>>>>>> CHANGE THE OUTCOME OF THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is the evidence that no such evidence exists? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> THIS PROVES >>>>>>> Nothing, because you didn't actually prove anything. >>>>>> >>>>>> That no human being on the planet ever presented any >>>>>> actual evidence what-so-ever of any election fraud >>>>>> that could have possibly changed the outcome of the >>>>>> 2020 presidential election >>>>> That's not evidence. >>>> >>>> It is proof of somethings and evidence of others and not >>>> even evidence of other things. >>> >>> What is isn't is evidence that there was no election interference. >>> >>>> >>>> Saying this is it simply not evidence without saying >>>> exactly what it is not evidence is >>> On 7/12/2026 10:15 AM, olcott wrote: >>> > One-two punch Destroys Liars >>> > #WhatIsTheEvidence >>> > #ThatIsNotEvidence >>> > Around and around until Defeated >>> >> >> That no one can possibly provide any evidence > > What is the evidence of that? > You already know. You game is infinitely deceptive. If you are not focused on always being stuck in rebuttal mode then you provide an acceptable basis. -- Copyright 2026 Olcott My 28 year goal has been to make "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language" reliably computable for the entire body of general knowledge. The complete structure of this system is now defined. The entire body of knowledge expressed in language is comprised of two types of relations between finite strings: (a) *Axioms* Expressions of language that are stipulated to be true. My system bridges the analytic/synthetic distinction by expressly encoding all empirical "atomic facts" in a formal language such as CycL of the Cyc project. (b) *Inference Rules* Expressions of language that are semantically entailed syntactically from (a) and/or (b).
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Olcott's system "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2026-07-12 10:11 +0200
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 09:15 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-12 14:30 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 11:13 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-12 16:48 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 11:56 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-13 10:38 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 11:28 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 12:19 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 11:25 -0500
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-15 11:01 -0600
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 12:24 -0500
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-15 13:32 -0600
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 15:34 -0500
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-15 18:10 -0600
Re: Olcott's system Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-17 12:48 +0100
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 10:18 +0300
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 10:13 +0300
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 15:28 -0400
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 10:05 +0300
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-13 10:22 +0300
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-13 13:51 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 10:31 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-13 16:22 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 11:37 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-13 20:17 +0000
Re: Olcott's system "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 13:33 -0700
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 15:48 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 18:01 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-14 12:07 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 12:33 -0500
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 14:39 -0700
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 16:56 -0500
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 15:38 -0700
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 17:49 -0500
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 17:29 -0700
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 19:38 -0500
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 19:03 -0700
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 21:12 -0500
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 13:03 -0700
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 15:56 -0500
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 20:18 -0700
Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 10:42 +0300
Re: Olcott's system Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 21:27 -0700
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 23:43 -0500
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-13 16:03 -0600
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 18:05 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-14 11:51 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 14:35 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 10:41 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 10:34 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 12:34 +0300
Re: Olcott's system Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-17 20:10 +0100
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-14 12:19 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 14:45 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 10:43 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 10:35 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 10:45 +0300
Re: Olcott's system Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-17 08:44 +0100
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-17 12:43 +0000
Re: Olcott's system "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-17 11:55 -0700
Re: Olcott's system Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-21 15:02 +0100
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-21 16:36 +0000
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-22 11:10 -0600
Re: Olcott's system Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-22 19:20 +0100
Re: Olcott's system "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-22 13:43 -0700
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-22 21:31 +0000
Re: Olcott's system Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-24 11:42 +0100
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-24 12:24 +0000
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 10:30 +0300
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-14 11:19 +0300
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-14 12:30 +0000
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 10:54 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 14:26 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 11:06 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 10:47 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 10:49 +0300
Re: Olcott's system "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-18 00:41 -0700
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 10:38 -0600
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 11:51 -0500
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 11:29 -0600
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 13:00 -0500
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 12:49 -0600
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 13:57 -0500
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:02 -0400
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:04 -0400
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 14:29 -0500
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:31 -0400
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 14:46 -0500
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:51 -0400
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:04 -0500
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 16:06 -0400
Re: Olcott's system "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 13:34 -0700
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 14:15 -0600
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-13 11:08 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 11:33 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-13 16:43 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 11:56 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-13 17:14 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 12:20 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-13 20:24 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 17:49 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-14 12:48 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 12:41 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-14 19:39 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 14:59 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-14 20:12 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 15:33 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-14 20:48 +0000
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 16:04 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-14 11:07 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 14:22 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 11:11 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 10:52 -0500
Re: Olcott's system "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 15:59 -0700
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 11:10 +0300
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-14 10:59 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 14:19 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 11:16 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 10:54 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 11:13 +0300
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 15:36 -0400
Re: Olcott's system "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 13:45 -0700
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-14 10:57 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 14:16 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 11:24 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 11:00 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 11:25 +0300
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 13:50 -0600
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:08 -0500
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 11:31 +0300
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 13:25 -0600
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:02 -0500
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 16:04 -0400
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:15 -0500
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 16:27 -0400
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:56 -0500
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 17:03 -0400
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 16:21 -0500
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 17:27 -0400
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 16:40 -0500
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 17:57 -0400
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 17:15 -0500
Re: Olcott's system dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 18:28 -0400
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 15:38 -0600
Totally clueless about inductive inference? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 16:44 -0500
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 15:56 -0600
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 17:10 -0500
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 16:31 -0600
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 18:33 -0500
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 18:32 -0600
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 19:53 -0500
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 21:00 -0400
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 20:18 -0500
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 21:19 -0400
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 20:23 -0500
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 21:26 -0400
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 20:28 -0500
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-13 08:49 -0600
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 10:34 -0500
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-13 10:47 -0600
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 12:00 -0500
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-13 11:49 -0600
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 12:55 -0500
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-14 12:27 +0300
Re: Totally clueless about inductive inference? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 13:56 -0700
Re: Olcott's system André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2026-07-12 14:34 -0600
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:49 -0500
Re: Olcott's system "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 13:52 -0700
Re: Olcott's system Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-15 11:30 +0300
Terribly evil lies that kill all life on Earth olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 11:07 -0500
Re: Terribly evil lies that kill all life on Earth Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-15 16:50 +0000
Re: Terribly evil lies that kill all life on Earth olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 12:19 -0500
Re: Terribly evil lies that kill all life on Earth Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-07-15 17:54 +0000
Re: Terribly evil lies that kill all life on Earth olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-15 13:05 -0500
Re: Terribly evil lies that kill all life on Earth Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-07-18 11:32 +0100
Re: Terribly evil lies that kill all life on Earth Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 11:52 +0300
Re: Terribly evil lies that kill all life on Earth Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-07-16 11:45 +0300
Re: Olcott's system olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 11:23 -0500
Re: Olcott's system inconsistent "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2026-07-13 08:24 +0200
Re: Olcott's system inconsistent olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-07-13 10:35 -0500
Re: Olcott's system inconsistent "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2026-07-22 10:31 +0200
csiph-web