Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.fan.harry-potter > #570
| From | BobbieSellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextremeinvalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.harry-potter, alt.fantasy, rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.books.childrens, alt.magick, alt.paranormal.spells.hexes.magic |
| Subject | Re: Harry Potter ... vs David Copperfield |
| Date | 2026-06-28 09:30 -0700 |
| Organization | nil |
| Message-ID | <111ri6i$3o01c$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <0001HW.2FE6411F035483EE3065F238F@news.eternal-september.org> <111r757$3kq2c$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 6/28/26 06:21, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > On 6/20/2026 11:31 AM, David Dalton wrote: >> In my latest attempt at global new age onset magickal >> workings, which I describe on my web page and on >> alt.religion.druid , I have invoked a Harry Potter Magic >> Circle as some of the collaborators. > Harry Potter is a movie "creature". He does not > exist in reality. I shall NOT classify him as a > real magician, and hence has no place in Usenet > newsgroups related to magic. > > When we talk magic in Usenet, we are talkiing > about real magic as in lores and fairy tales. > > David Copperfield might be a better candicate, > but if and only if he really uses magic, not > movie tricks. :) > > David Copperfield (illusionist) - Wikipedia > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Copperfield_(illusionist)> /rant on/ Mr. Man-wai Chang you may well know the following but in case you do not I explicate the matters at hand. Actually Harry Potter and his friends are the subjects not only of a Movie but of a long series of books and each book is long and the each book in the series gets longer. It was very popular with the young people a long time before the movies. I never got into the Potter matters in very deeply but when nothing better was available I would look at the movies on TV. My equivalent series was the Lord of the Rings from the Hobbit onward. I also liked the EE Doc Smith "Interplanetary" and Lensman stories, the stories of Manuel by James Branch Cabell. Loot at Figures of Earth for a sample. Magic per se is not real. David Copperfield was a slight of hand artist before he went to TV and Video. His magic is not "real". The idea of "real magic" was invented when people did not understand the real physical world very well so they invented stories to explain what they saw during natural events. This group, rec.arts.sf.written. is about fictional i.e. unreal matters. Lots of stories you see on Television or Video are based on books or at least written out stories that may go directly to film or have a history of being printed. SF no longer stands for Science Fiction as it die in my distant youth but for Speculative Fiction which includes not only speculative science but fantasy such as gods, demons, vampires, zombies and other un-dead creatures but fairies, gnomes, leprechauns, pixies and little i.e. child-sized adults, very small men. Over-indulgence in alcohol and other poisons may well have a part in these imagined creatures. Time travel is not real and may most likely be as impossible as "real" magic and yet films and videos have been made about it. According to our understanding of the Universe Star Wars and all the episodes and seasons of Star Trek are totally impossible. Both were based on stories published in Science Fiction magazines from mostly the 20th Century which ran from 1901 to 2000. Those magazines have suffered an unfortunate decline in the 21st Century where people will live (hopefully) until the 22nd Century. David Dalton seems to me to be very confused and seems to believe in magic of one sort or another. I see that he includes children's books in this mailing and talking animals featured in many children's books are not real. I do not believe in Magick however it is mis-spelled. And the same goes for spells and hexes. There are some paranormal phenomena which seem interesting but which seem become very elusive when examined closely. Freddie the talking Pig was amusing to a young person in the 1940s at any rate. But this group rec.arts.sf.written is about stories not about reality and people who want to talk about the reality of impossibility should be disregarded Dalton is in my filters on several groups where he almost never seems to on topic. /rant off/
Back to alt.fan.harry-potter | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Harry Potter Magic Circle David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2026-06-20 01:01 -0230
Re: Harry Potter Magic Circle David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2026-06-21 00:16 -0230
Re: Harry Potter ... vs David Copperfield "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-28 21:21 +0800
Re: Harry Potter ... vs David Copperfield BobbieSellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextremeinvalid.com> - 2026-06-28 09:30 -0700
Re: Harry Potter ... vs David Copperfield "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 02:12 +0800
Re: Harry Potter ... vs David Copperfield kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-06-28 14:29 -0400
Re: Harry Potter ... cross-posting, trolling, why? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 11:34 +0800
Re: Harry Potter ... vs David Copperfield "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 12:27 +0800
Re: Harry Potter... vs Ghost Sweeper Mikami "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 20:39 +0800
Re: Harry Potter ... vs Cardcaptor Sakura "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 20:41 +0800
Re: Harry Potter ... vs Cardcaptor Sakura "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-30 01:25 +0800
Cardcaptor Sakura: Clear Card - Official Trailer - YouTube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-01 13:42 +0800
Re: Harry Potter ... vs Wataru "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 20:46 +0800
csiph-web