Re: Bloody football!

From	"J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk>
Newsgroups	uk.tech.broadcast
Subject	Re: Bloody football!
Date	2026-06-28 14:20 +0100
Organization	255 software
Message-ID	<111r730$35ft6$8@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <111j9g3$3poca$1@dont-email.me> <111k0hk$3vdtr$3@dont-email.me> <slrn1141vc8.e70.abuse@news.pr.network> <111r25i$35ft7$4@dont-email.me> <nack7lFe9qpU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2026/6/28 14:0:37, John Williamson wrote:
> On 28/06/2026 12:56, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
> 
>> Perhaps the sport could get its own slot on "the prime channels" so the
>> _weekly_ schedule didn't/doesn't get disrupted. I'm sure there is plenty
>> of sport that could fill that "slot" when the same-time-every-year
>> events aren't on. (It used to be, for example, normal that Saturday
>> afternoons on the "prime channels" - and a slot that evening, with a
>> distinctive theme tune - was sport.)
>> []
>>
> The timeslots for the current batch of "kicking a bag of wind round a 
> field" games are not set by our broadcasters, but by those running the 
> tournament. The times are set to maximise the audiences and so the 
> advertising revenue in the USA.

Ah yes, "must broadcast at the exact minute it happens" (same applies to
news, though there it's "must discuss _before_ it happens"). Whatever
happened to "look away now"?
> 
> As for filling the (normally) empty slots on a 24 hour channel with 
> other sports, even the popular ones now are struggling to get an 
> audience outside peak hours.
> 
No, I was suggesting a "sports" slot on what you call the "prime"
channels, so those who like an ordered life know to avoid that time, and
those who _do_ want it also can have it at an ordered time. My reference
to other sports was to forestall anyone saying "but the world cup [or
whatever] is only on at times - what will you fill that slot with
otherwise?".
-- 
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

I don't see the requirement to upset people. ... There's enough to make
fun of without offending.
- Ronnie Corbett, in Radio Times 6-12 August 2011.

Thread

Bloody football! NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-06-17 22:42 +0100
  Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-17 23:14 +0100
    Re: Bloody football! Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2026-06-18 06:10 +0000
      Re: Bloody football! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-06-18 09:46 +0100
        Re: Bloody football! Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2026-06-18 18:54 +0100
          Re: Bloody football! JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-06-18 20:36 +0100
            Re: Bloody football! Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2026-06-19 09:18 +0100
  Re: Bloody football! JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-06-18 08:03 +0100
  Re: Bloody football! jon <reading.mostly@crap.org> - 2026-06-25 01:24 +0000
    Re: Bloody football! NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-06-25 14:12 +0100
      Re: Bloody football! Old John <watcombeman@yahoo.co.uk> - 2026-06-25 15:31 +0000
      Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-25 20:45 +0100
        Re: Bloody football! Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> - 2026-06-26 08:12 +0100
          Re: Bloody football! JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-06-26 12:11 +0100
            Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-26 19:21 +0100
              Re: Bloody football! Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> - 2026-06-27 09:49 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-27 20:50 +0100
            Re: Bloody football! Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2026-06-27 12:07 +0100
              Re: Bloody football! John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-06-27 15:34 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-27 20:58 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-06-27 23:37 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-28 01:26 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-06-28 11:20 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-28 12:50 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-06-28 13:41 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-28 14:13 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2026-06-28 13:26 +0000
                Re: Bloody football! NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-06-29 13:22 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2026-06-29 12:34 +0000
                Re: Bloody football! JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-06-29 14:41 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-06-29 18:48 +0100
        Re: Bloody football! Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> - 2026-06-28 10:55 +0000
          Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-28 12:56 +0100
            Re: Bloody football! John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-06-28 14:00 +0100
              Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-28 14:20 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-06-28 15:59 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-28 18:36 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-06-28 21:46 +0100
              Re: Bloody football! JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-06-28 16:10 +0100
                Re: Bloody football! John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-06-28 16:17 +0100

csiph-web