Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #38032
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| Subject | Re: Pi PICO W on batteries |
| Date | 2026-06-15 16:52 +0100 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <110p73m$fa7l$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <n987saFkc5pU1@mid.individual.net> <110onqi$ai08$1@dont-email.me> <n9a869Fu2vjU1@mid.individual.net> <110oqk3$baoh$3@dont-email.me> <n9aenlFhktU1@mid.individual.net> |
On 15/06/2026 14:58, Peter Heitzer wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 15/06/2026 13:06, Peter Heitzer wrote: >>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 14/06/2026 18:48, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2026 12:17:25 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Early days, but if anyone is thinking of battery powering a PICO outside >>>>>> for intermittent use, a nano timer and lithium primary cells looks to >>>>>> be the best technology. >>>>> >>>>> Why not 18650s? 2 would give you a little over 7V >>>> >>>> "The maximum recommended input voltage for a Raspberry Pi Pico or Pico W >>>> is 5.5V. Powering the board above 6.0V will permanently damage the >>>> onboard voltage regulator" >>> >>> One cell should be sufficient for powering the Pico. The regulator >>> lower limit is 2.3 V so there is a need for deep discharge protection >>> on the cell. >>> >> I bench tested the device., Its not just a pico W. There is an >> ultrasonic device in there as well. >> >> It stared to fail around 4V. > Then two 18650 in serial and a 5V switching regulator should do the > job. Sigh, The nano power switch will not handle that voltage Putting a regulator in front negates the point of having a nano power switch, > Perhaps a small USB powerbank may also work if you find one > that does not shut off if the consumed current it to low. > > Or drain the power in a month... Sheesh. Why do some people always think they know better? "I have examined, X,Y,Z,A ,B and C I found Q to be optimal" "Why didn't you use A B or C?" " -- Climate is what you expect but weather is what you get. Mark Twain
Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-14 12:17 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-14 17:48 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 12:31 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-06-15 13:04 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 13:17 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2026-06-15 12:06 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 13:19 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2026-06-15 13:58 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 16:52 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2026-06-15 12:52 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> - 2026-06-15 19:49 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 20:28 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-06-15 20:54 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-16 01:59 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2026-06-24 09:33 +0300
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-24 09:58 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-06-24 13:41 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-24 13:53 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2026-06-24 14:51 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-24 16:41 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries wmartin <wwm@wwmartin.net> - 2026-06-24 20:35 -0700
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-06-25 09:21 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-25 10:12 +0100
csiph-web