Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.theory > #141483

Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it?

From "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.theory, sci.logic
Subject Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it?
Date 2026-06-05 14:34 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <10vvfcc$1ej83$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <10vpf1a$3famt$1@dont-email.me> <10vr9a9$56hg$5@dont-email.me> <10vtk23$rto3$6@dont-email.me> <10vu4v4$11dns$1@dont-email.me> <10vu7cs$12077$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/5/2026 3:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
> On 6/5/26 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:
>>
>>> u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced 
>>> psychosis???
>> Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
>> psychosis is a fairly new thing.
>>
> 
> oh right, ai enhanced psychosis i suppose...
> 
> but like seriously: wtf is up with trying to define the complexity for 
> problems that can have no solution?
> 
> where each step up is defined by yet another undecidable situation?
> 

PO is God, remember?

Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-03 07:51 -0700
  Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-04 00:26 -0700
    Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-04 21:41 -0700
      Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-06-05 12:30 +0300
        Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 03:11 -0700
          Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 14:34 -0700
            Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 15:01 -0700
              Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 00:18 +0200
              Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 17:05 -0700
            Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 00:21 +0200
              Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 01:13 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 17:05 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 02:16 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 02:20 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:48 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 22:53 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:01 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:03 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:10 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:49 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 22:57 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:02 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:03 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:19 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:17 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:22 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:27 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:38 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:46 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:55 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 05:03 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:04 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:34 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:39 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:49 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:55 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:06 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:13 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 05:10 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 19:04 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 06:23 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-07 16:44 +0200
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 10:37 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-07 19:55 +0200
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 11:23 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 14:34 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 17:01 -0400
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 16:20 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 17:37 -0400
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 15:49 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 18:30 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 17:29 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 19:52 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 18:12 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:19 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 23:06 -0400
                Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:23 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:29 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:35 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:58 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 23:07 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 00:13 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:01 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 08:10 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-08 09:52 -0400
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 09:27 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 09:02 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:22 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 09:31 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:46 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 11:08 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:51 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:22 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 16:44 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 17:08 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 19:24 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 20:27 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 16:58 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 20:45 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 20:43 -0700
                Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 11:47 -0700
                Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:28 -0700
                Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:41 -0700
                Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 18:35 -0700
                Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:05 -0700
                Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-12 20:45 -0700
                Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 18:37 -0700
                Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:07 -0700
                Nick's WTC Jewish Conspiracy Theory Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:28 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Esrimushmoneh <a@a.a> - 2026-06-09 10:00 +0000
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:51 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:16 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:16 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:57 -0700
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Esrimushmoneh <a@a.a> - 2026-06-08 14:48 +0000
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 10:39 -0500
                Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:55 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:04 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:08 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:30 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:37 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:04 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 23:27 -0500
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:26 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 16:48 -0500
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:00 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:37 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:44 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:47 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:48 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 12:16 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:46 -0700
                Altered States of Mind With the Fly Agaric Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 17:01 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:22 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 20:49 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 21:05 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 21:43 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:51 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 22:54 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:57 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:44 -0700
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 22:50 +0200
                Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:57 -0700
          Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-06-11 22:03 +0100
            Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-12 01:02 -0700
        Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-06-11 22:00 +0100
          Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-06-12 09:54 +0300

csiph-web