Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.telecom.broadband > #57340
| From | Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.telecom.broadband |
| Subject | Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network |
| Date | 2026-06-02 16:44 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10vmtoi$31jd0$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <10uoq5o$18u71$1@dont-email.me> <10upkpq$1gp7v$1@dont-email.me> <5cde706d3cbob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <10v698s$2ke7l$1@dont-email.me> <5ce20960e9bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> |
On 2026-06-01 09:49, Bob Latham wrote:
> In article <10v698s$2ke7l$1@dont-email.me>,
> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> He turned twitter into a ring-wing echo chamber making it an unsafe
>> place for women and any minorities to be present.
>
> I do apologise, I should have addressed this at the time.
>
> How the blazes can you be "unsafe" reading & writing on your phone?
>
> Do people fear their phones will explode?
>
> Up to the point where Mr. Musk took charge of twitter it was heavily
> filtered in favour of the woke left. Posts not with left views were
> blocked. It was a left wing echo chamber, you've admitted as much
> yourself.
False opinion stated as if it were fact.
> When musk took over he stopped the filtering and bias and allowed
> people from the right to speak, he did NOT filter out the left, no
> right wing echo chanber. How unreasonable of him, free speech for all
> how awful. The light of reality shone in the sacred hall of leftism
> like dracula's castle at dawn.
False opinion stated as if it were fact. The actual facts are believed
to be as follows:
https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/elon-musk-trump-x-algorithm-bias-b2640976.html
"Analysis of the social media platform – which the tech billionaire
acquired in 2022 – showed that Mr Musk’s posts saw a sudden increase in
views and engagement shortly after he began endorsing Donald Trump for
US president.
[...]
“The analysis of Elon Musk’s engagement metrics on X (formerly Twitter)
reveals that Musk’s account exhibited distinct and elevated engagement
patterns compared to other accounts, particularly around a key
structural change on 13 July, 2024,” the researchers wrote in a study
detailing their analysis.
“These findings underscore a distinct pattern that may indicate an
algorithmic shift that disproportionately favoured Musk’s account,
contributing to a considerable engagement advantage.”
The researchers studied more than 56,000 posts on X from a selection of
Democrat-leaning and Republican-leaning accounts in order to provide a
basis of comparison for Mr Musk’s political posts.
Examining three engagement metrics – view counts, retweets and
favourites – the study found that the potential of algorithmic bias
“favoured [his] content in terms of visibility or recommendation” from
13 July onwards.
After this date, view counts of the billionaire’s posts shot up by 138
per cent, while retweets rose by 238 per cent, suggesting that he
benefited from “an enhanced increase in visibility post-change relative
to other accounts”.
The results raise important questions about the potential impact of
algorithmic adjustments on public discourse and the ‘neutrality’ of
social media platforms, according to the researchers."
Note the 138% percent figure.
> This is why you think people felt unsafe afterwards isn't it? Because
> left wing ideology could be called out, challenged, and dismantled by
> reality and the world of fantasy collapses. Then all the Snowflakes
> ran off to another platform. If they had a decent arguments that
> wouldn't happen.
The effects of the changes outlined above were to help a presidential
candidate who by then was certainly a convicted felon and already widely
suspected to be a Russian asset, suspicions that since have been
confirmed by his disastrous second term, as appended in detail below.
In summary, everything Trump does on the international stage either
favours Putin, for example the Iran war pushing up oil prices, or else
falls within "spheres of three superpower influence" (where Trump gets
to do what he likes in the Americas like Venezuela and Cuba, Putin gets
to do what he likes in Europe in general and Ukraine in particular, and
Xi gets to do what he likes in Asia).
If you don't want to wade through the evidence stacked up below, just
ask yourself one simple question: Trump is famous for publicly attacking
his political and other enemies, even including The Pope, so is there
any public figure whom he has never publicly criticised? Yes, his name
is Vladimir Putin.
And all this was enabled largely through Musk's support in biasing
Twitter/X to be a pro-Musk, and therefore pro-Trump, platform, rather
than an independent and unbiased one.
========
Trump's pro-Russian treachery ...
General evidence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxZAvKlZ7qc
(mainly approximately first 10 mins)
More specifically:
1) As previously widely covered in various media stories, Russian
money and Russian investors in previous Trump ventures mean that he is
beholden to them, and one wonders who bought most of the Trump meme coin
released around the start of his second term, and how much influence
thereby those buyers have gained over him?
https://www.alternet.org/2017/01/donald-trump-was-bailed-out-bankruptcy-russia-crime-bosses
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsIntuxmXf0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5NWwcgyNZk (8:39 in)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/$Trump#Reception
2) As previously widely covered in various media stories, his early
visits to Russia, for example:
https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-russia-the-hidden-history-of-trumps-first-trip-to-moscow/
3) Famously once remarked that he trusted Putin more than he trusted
his own security services.
4) Appointing known Russian sympathisers to administration positions
at different levels, potentially significantly compromising US security
specifically and Western security more generally. The many examples
include ...
J D Vance - Vance's advancement in life has been funded by
Peter Thiel, who, as the Epstein papers have
revealed, had some involvement in Epstein's
Russian connections and is a possible Russian
asset. Unsurprisingly therefore, Vance himself
has often publicly parroted pro-Russian or pro-
Putin propaganda, and led the attempted
humiliation of President Zelensky in the Oval
Office.
Tulsi Gabbard - Probable Russian asset appointed as DNI (Jeez!),
but thankfully has now resigned, but one wonders
how much damage has already been done.
Sergio Gor - Born Sergey Gorokhovsky in Tashkent. Another
probable/possible Russian asset. Formerly he was
Director of the White House Presidential Personnel
Office from Nov 24 to August 25, now US Ambassador
to India. There was much controversy about his
time in the WH because of his murky past and the
fact that he had never had proper security
clearance for the role, yet in that role was
responsible for ensuring that other WH employees
had proper security clearance.
5) Gave badly needed Covid-19 testing equipment to Putin during the
height of the pandemic.
6) Russian style of 'negotiation', as described by Kaja Kallas:
Demand the max, don't give an inch, so that in the end you come away
with something that you've never had before.
7) Russian psychological mixture of self-proclaimed victimhood,
conceit, vengefulness, and cruelty: "They stole the election from me",
"I will stop that war within 24 hours", "Crooked Joe Biden", "You
haven't got the cards!".
8) Posturing over Panama Canal, Greenland, & Canada exactly like
Russia's posturing over former Soviet Block states;
9) Like Russia, breaks existing agreements, for example the current
so-called 'tariff wars' breaking previous economic agreements with
formerly well-respected allies, agreements which were working perfectly
satisfactorily in the view of most economists and politicians.
10) The tariffs themselves when used in such a widespread way become
a mechanism of a managed rather than a free-market economy, exactly
contrary to traditional Republican and conservative principles and
suggestive of Communism, the well-documented economic failure of which
doesn't seem to deter Trump. Particularly, the intended reduction of
imbalance of trade mirrors what the Soviet Union tried to do in
manufacturing everything they needed internally, which was one of the
factors leading to its collapse.
11) Repeats Russian propaganda unquestioningly, such as the 'hundreds
of surrounded Ukrainian fighters' towards the end of the Ukrainian
incursion into Kursk, whom he 'begged Putin to spare', but who were
never surrounded to need anyone's mercy; meanwhile there are countless
videos of Ukrainian PoWs who have surrendered to the Russians being
summarily executed, countless well-documented accounts of children being
killed by Russian strikes on civilian infrastructure, countless children
abducted for 'Russification' in Russia, and video evidence being posted
online by Russians themselves of Ukrainian civilians in Kherson being
hunted and killed by Russian drones, all of which are blatant war
crimes, and Russia's own soldiers are being brutally sacrificed in a
useless war to the extent that even cripples on crutches are being sent
back to the front to hobble towards Ukrainian positions so that they
will be killed and the state won't have to pay for their medical
treatment, so does anyone really think that Putin would genuinely spare
any Ukrainian unless he happened in a particular case to have a
particular reason for doing so?
12) Russian styles of propaganda: a) Hijack the news to distract
from coverage of adverse events: for example, when there is a NATO
meeting concerning the war, or a meeting in Ukraine's peace process, the
Russians often bomb a hospital or a children's playground so that the
news is filled with that rather than the adverse event - it doesn't
matter to them that what they do is a war crime or atrocity, all the
better for hijacking the news, and anyway they'll have no shame about
lying that they were bombing military personnel, regardless of how
publicly and freely available the undeniable evidence to the contrary.
Similarly, during the presidential election debate, which most agree was
being and was won by Harris, "They're eating the pets", it didn't matter
that this was a blatant lie, it partially hijacked the news cycle away
from Harris' success.
13) Russian styles of propaganda: b) The Firehose Of Falsehood:
Create so many narratives that people get confused into a sense that
there is no longer any absolute undeniable truth; MAGA generally and
Trump particularly are famous for making multiple false claims at the
same time, often in the same sentence, some of which may even be
mutually contradictory.
14) Russian styles of propaganda: c) Create imagined enemies from
which only the 'great leader' can save the nation, so Putin creates
unfounded fears in Russia regarding NATO etc, while Trump creates fears
in America regarding 'wokeness', the 'deep state', and other
non-existent or non-threatening alleged 'threats', which twats like you
believe unquestioningly.
15) Russian styles of propaganda: d) Accuse enemies of exactly
what you are doing or about to do. For example, Russia falsely accuses
Ukraine of having bio-warfare labs, yet itself constantly uses chemical
weapons in the war. Similarly, Trump constantly accuses political
opponents of having done things he has done himself, as described here:
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/24/opinions/trumps-absurd-projection-reveals-his-anxiety-avlon/index.html
16) Seems to be trying to make come true the unhinged plan of his
uncle outlined in the following video, hence his doomed attempt at
re-alignment with Russia, who obviously are using this obsession to play
him like a hooked fish (Trump 31 mins in, but my advice is to watch it
all to gain a better historical perspective):
Top Investigative Journalist EXPOSES TRUMP-MAGA-PUTIN Links
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tBX94b4vCw
17) Defends Sumy strike killing over 30 civilians as a 'mistake' on
no tangible evidence.
--
Fake news kills!
I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
www.macfh.co.uk
Back to uk.telecom.broadband | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Broadband Over Mobile Network "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-05-17 10:08 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2026-05-17 11:05 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-05-17 12:18 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2026-05-17 11:54 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-05-21 20:24 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2026-05-22 05:39 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-05-22 13:13 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2026-05-25 10:10 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2026-05-25 13:25 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-05-27 08:16 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-05-27 08:43 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-05-27 12:54 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2026-05-27 10:20 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-05-27 12:54 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2026-05-27 19:31 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-27 20:09 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-05-28 07:17 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> - 2026-05-28 07:26 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> - 2026-05-28 07:59 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-05-28 14:07 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2026-05-28 11:14 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> - 2026-05-27 13:43 +0000
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2026-05-27 16:36 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2026-05-28 11:32 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2026-06-01 09:49 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-06-01 11:12 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2026-06-02 16:44 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-02 23:46 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2026-06-03 09:08 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2026-06-03 13:58 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-04 00:06 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2026-06-04 03:32 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-06-04 05:13 +0100
Re: Broadband Over Mobile Network Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-17 15:01 +0100
csiph-web