Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.homebuilt > #60620
| From | Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.comp.homebuilt |
| Subject | Artificial but not intelligent (Was: New PC for Phil...) |
| Date | 2026-06-02 13:06 +0100 |
| Organization | Daniel James |
| Message-ID | <10vmgvt$2th8j$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <MPG.448698d31897c3969896aa@news.eternal-september.org> <10vknok$2f8sf$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.44880a006edb94169896ac@news.eternal-september.org> <10vluav$2ojj0$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.4488c4e366f061e59896ad@news.eternal-september.org> |
On 02/06/2026 11:46, Philip Herlihy wrote: > The reasoning and integrative power of these tools is awesome, and > we're only getting started in 2026. I agree it can be impressive. Don't kid yourself, though, the tool isn't "reasoning" at all. It's collating the results from a deep search of the knowledge available to its model and then formatting that as an output using the terms of the question. Any reasoning about the knowledge was done before it was put into the database used by the tool. It's just a very sophisticated cut-and-paste exercise. Whether the output is any use depends on the quality of the data and on the ability of the model to exclude false positives in the search. The larger the database the higher the chance that there will be sufficient true positives for the model to be able to recognize and exclude false ones. -- Cheers, Daniel.
Back to uk.comp.homebuilt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New PC for Phil... Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2026-05-31 20:13 +0100
Re: New PC for Phil... Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk> - 2026-05-31 21:01 +0100
Re: New PC for Phil... [OT - why Windows?] Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2026-06-01 12:46 +0100
Re: New PC for Phil... [OT - why Windows?] Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> - 2026-06-03 08:02 +0000
Re: New PC for Phil... [OT - why Windows?] Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2026-06-03 15:44 +0100
Re: New PC for Phil... RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2026-06-01 19:49 +0000
Re: New PC for Phil... Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2026-06-01 22:29 +0100
Re: New PC for Phil... RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2026-06-02 06:47 +0000
Re: New PC for Phil... Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2026-06-02 11:46 +0100
Artificial but not intelligent (Was: New PC for Phil...) Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2026-06-02 13:06 +0100
Re: Artificial but not intelligent (Was: New PC for Phil...) "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-06-02 12:55 +0000
Re: Artificial but not intelligent (Was: New PC for Phil...) Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2026-06-03 15:51 +0100
Re: Artificial but not intelligent (Was: New PC for Phil...) Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2026-06-03 18:33 +0100
Re: Artificial but not intelligent (Was: New PC for Phil...) "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-06-04 08:18 +0000
Re: Artificial but not intelligent Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-06-04 22:23 +0100
Re: Artificial but not intelligent "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-06-05 07:37 +0000
Re: Artificial but not intelligent (Was: New PC for Phil...) RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2026-06-04 21:13 +0000
Re: Artificial but not intelligent (Was: New PC for Phil...) Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2026-06-25 12:42 +0100
Re: New PC for Phil... Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-06-05 00:37 +0100
Re: New PC for Phil... Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2026-06-07 11:55 +0100
csiph-web