Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.homebuilt > #60565
| From | Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.comp.homebuilt |
| Subject | Re: Graphics Question |
| Date | 2026-05-21 10:55 +0100 |
| Organization | Daniel James |
| Message-ID | <10umkqm$l4c8$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <xn0ppxd68769fok00b@news.individual.net> <10ufgnf$2l589$1@dont-email.me> <xn0ppygf486bn9100c@news.individual.net> |
On 19/05/2026 08:37, Jeff Gaines wrote: > The original was an mp4 and it churned out a longer mp4, 102K became > 1.2 MB. MP4 is just a container. Different MP4 files can have the video inside them encoded in different ways. Not confusing at all, eh? > It used the NVidia card for the rendering. > > It runs in VLC on the PC it was rendered on but not in VLC on my > main PC. Both copies of VLC say they are up to date. What happens if you encode the video again without using the nVidia card? It could be that the card is using a codec that it can decode but that the other PC doesn't have (I presume it doesn't have the same nVidia card). -- Cheers, Daniel.
Back to uk.comp.homebuilt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Graphics Question "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-05-18 14:47 +0000
Re: Graphics Question Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2026-05-18 18:02 +0100
Re: Graphics Question "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-05-19 07:37 +0000
Re: Graphics Question Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2026-05-21 10:55 +0100
Re: Graphics Question "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-05-21 10:07 +0000
Re: Graphics Question Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-05-21 11:55 +0100
Re: Graphics Question "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2026-05-21 11:16 +0000
Re: Graphics Question Abandoned Trolley <that.bloke@microsoft.com> - 2026-05-21 14:50 +0100
Re: Graphics Question RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2026-05-21 15:18 +0000
csiph-web