Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #895145
| From | Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) |
| Date | 2026-02-17 21:48 -0600 |
| Organization | Modern Human |
| Message-ID | <10n3cr2$c8qr$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <10mg2cc$1a5h$1@solani.org> <10mjsid$21cr$1@solani.org> <10mu476$8ndr$1@solani.org> <10mu7ae$9bic$1@solani.org> <10n2spt$buok$1@solani.org> |
On 2/17/26 5:15 PM, Taskfreak wrote: > On 2/15/26 10:43 PM, Taskfreak wrote: >> On 2/15/26 9:51 PM, Taskfreak wrote: >>> On 2/12/26 12:39 AM, Taskfreak wrote: >>>> On 2/10/26 1:53 PM, Taskfreak wrote: >>>>> On 2/7/26 3:28 PM, Taskfreak wrote: >>>>>> So at this point I'm on the side of the 50% who think the war will >>>>>> not happen, and on the side of the 100% who think Iran won't >>>>>> accept any of the four unrealistic conditions even if all the >>>>>> sanctions against her are removed! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Do you know that right before the new "negotiations" began, USA >>>>> quietly slipped an additional 5th condition to the previous 4 ?.. >>>>> Hahhahhahhhah :-))) >>>>> >>>>> If you look at that additional condition you'll immediately see why >>>>> Trump did it and why Iran accepted another "negotiation". >>>>> >>>>> It says something along these lines: Iran should not make >>>>> aggressive attacks against any of her neighbors. >>>>> >>>>> :-) >>>>> >>>>> Well, I bet you Sheep don't know that Iran has not made an >>>>> aggressive attack on any of her neighbors for the past 250 years!.. >>>>> The last one was carried out by Nader Shah. Any other attack since, >>>>> has been for the sole act of defense against aggressive attacks >>>>> from neighbors toward Iran. >>>>> >>>>> So Trump wants Iran to "agree" to that condition, and to that >>>>> condition only, so he can say he won, therefore no war :) >>>>> Hahhhahah :-) >>>>> >>>>> He's done stuff like that before too, you know, circumventing all >>>>> those faggot Neocons who want war with Iran. Hehe :) >>>> >>>> >>>> I am still thinking the same. >>>> >>>> Netanyahu's visit didn't change anything. He probably just flashed >>>> Trump some more files :-) Hehe :) >>>> >>>> And since Trump is so confident nobody can prosecute him regarding >>>> Epstein's files, decisions about Iran stayed the same. >>>> >>>> Why is Trump so confident about being protected against those >>>> files?.. He cannot be innocent, and he cooperated with FBI to go >>>> against Epstein. This only means one thing. He must've asked FBI for >>>> immunity in return for helping FBI get Epstein. >>>> >>>> That's why he is so confident about his being protected, even after >>>> Netanyahu flashing more files for him. And yet, he is still opposing >>>> the prosecution to continue on those files, so he is in his turn >>>> protecting someone else. It may have to do with Emarat! :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> In his English language post, Araghchi in response to Munich Security >>> Circus today said, "Europe is nowhere to be seen!" >>> >>> Hahhahhah :-)) >>> >>> And in his continuation of describing EU referred to it as a >>> "peripheral" entity :-) You know what that word means, peripheral, >>> don't you :) >>> >>> Translated to penitentiary English, "Bitch" is what it means! >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> Did you see the Valentine twit that the Israel's account in X did? It >> went something like this: >> >> "Dear World, I will never leave you. XOXO Love, Israel" then a >> heart with star of david in it. >> >> >> Just check the psychological state of these people.. >> Hahhahhahhahh :-))) They say it thmselves! :) >> >> What fucked up morons. >> >> >> >> > > > China has delivered scores of radars to Iran and they've filled up all > the holes and vacuums across Iran. Also many (the number is high, but as > of yet secret) modern and new fighter jets. Iran is to pay for all this > in the future, not right away. > > All sorts of communication systems and air defense equipment have been > delivered and implemented as well. This includes the Chinese versions of > AWACS. I think they want to test a lot of these systems against U.S. > and/or Israeli air attacks in a real war. > > Another important update is that there are now numerous information > gathering Chinese ships placed at strategic places in the Persian Gulf, > Oman Sea, and the Arabian sea, as well as information gathering > equipment across Iran (especially close to all borders and desert > routes) which have totally nullified American Navy and inland forces > ability to engage in "surprise" attacks against Iran. > > China's concern is for the whole region, not just the Iran's share. > Especially the oil industries on which they are dependent. So this move > from China lowers the probability of attacks by Iran on oil industries, > and raises the probability of attacks on Amerinan business assets in the > two cities I mentioned a few days back, and on attacking the American > bases all around Iran and the Persian Gulf. > > So war option is now even less favored today than it was just days back. > > And you must know Iran by now. If you do, you would know that she will > never conduct an operation in relation to one objective only. The > operation will be multi-faceted. This negotiation she is conducting with > the USA in Europe is itself quite a multifaceted operation. For > instance, I heard that Iran has even included offers for American > businesses' investments in some sectors inside Iran to circumvent some > of the unrealistic conditions that USA is (on the surface) imposing on > her, and to contrast it to the huge loss of USA's investments in the two > Emarati cities should a war with Iran take place. This has quite > frightened the Israelis :-) I can measure that fear by measuring anti- > Iranian propaganda that Israel supports and how disturbed and concerned > they've suddenly become. Literally shocked. They had not been prepared > for it. > > Such Israeli backed outlets, often inviting "specialists" to give their > takes about how Iran will lose in just every aspect of development that > there is, now, and I mean within only the last couple of days, cannot > anymore hold the discussions under control! Every one of them quickly is > led to a nasty verbal fight between the interviewers and their hosts! > Hehe :) > > In other words, Israelis are now crying, not arguing. The pain of the > upcoming loss, the dread of failing in this grand operation they have > conducted to push the American forces against Iran, has overwhelmed > them. And it should. > > It points to an old deep well-kept secret knowledge inside them, the > Israelis, that they are weaker than Iran and Iranians. As an individual, > as a team, as a tribe, as a society, as a nation, and especially as a > civilization, they are weaker than the Iranians. > > And this new development which was purposefully leaked out by the > Iranians, aiming at no one but the Israelis, brings that deep fear up in > them yet one more time. It is an ancient fear indeed. > > I told you about their state of mind seen in their Valentine's post. It > was a reflection of the fear I just described, except that they switched > the word _inferiority_ with the word "existence" itself to justify their > mass murders. All in the open for the right eyes to see! > > > > > > > > > But despite all these moves towards a more stable situation, one in which war is avoided, Iran is feverishly getting ready for war. Just today, Iran closed off the strait of Hormoz for several hours to conduct tests for her new AI driven system that will be used for stopping the oil traffic through the strait in the coming war. Lots of Iranian defense forces just yesterday were done with getting stationed behind northeastern areas to counter last week's Americans' moving fighter jets to the Tajikestan Republic. Also, the spread of radars and missiles on eastern Iran in general indicates that despite Pakestan's firm statement on not allowing American forces to use their air space, Iran is still treating that angle as if some U.S. aircrafts will come in via that angle. In a nutshell, although prospects look good for an agreement (a win for both Trump and Iran), this time around there will be no surprise attacks similar to those in last June. Eastern Iran played a huge role in winning the 12-day war last June. It was the area where Israeli jets could not reach. It was the area where the best missiles of Iran were stationed. As soon as more than half of the overt missile launchers on the west side of Iran were hit, these better and newer and more powerful missiles in the East were deployed and quickly brought Israel to its knees. Bagram base, which got suddenly popular and wanted by Trump, was to get American jets even closer to Iran. It won't happen! Iran had already taken full account of that in her preparations months back. But Americans thought the base in Tajikestan could do it for them instead. Not anymore. Iran's surveillance capabilities aren't like how it was last June. Nothing is being assumed in this war. Every scenario is dealt with. Even right now, there's not an hour that much is not getting done, arranged or tested, or rearranged according to what USA's forces are doing, every thing is in motion. 24x7.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-01-28 21:34 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-01-29 06:04 +0000
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-01-29 12:58 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-01-30 01:51 +0100
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-01-30 17:38 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-01-30 21:04 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-01-31 15:20 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-01-31 16:51 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-01 21:50 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-06 13:29 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-10 13:53 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-12 00:39 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-15 21:51 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-15 22:43 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 17:15 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 21:48 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-18 12:44 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-18 13:58 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 00:03 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-22 10:52 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-22 11:31 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 11:56 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 12:28 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 10:32 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-26 16:18 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-03-01 21:07 -0600
Re: A Fake War With Iran Getting Close :-) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-01-31 12:28 +0100
csiph-web