Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #15036
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | War between Scryer Prolog and Ciao Prolog [9:0 Triska vs Hermenegildo] (Was: Who will win the new Prolog race? SWI or Scryer?) |
| Date | 2025-11-19 12:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10fkas9$asq5$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <10bam8b$6mq5$1@solani.org> |
Hi, This wasn't clear to me. That there is a veritable war going on between Scryer Prolog and Ciao Prolog. One protagonist being Markus Triska, famous by the "Power of Prolog", and the other protagonist Manuel V. Hermenegildo somehow backed by the Prolog education group (PEG) and SWI ? So who will win the war, and exercise world domaninance in constraint logic programming, based on bogus notions such as "pure Prolog", which are inherently inconsistent? The war is mainly fought over teaching materials distributed, less over tangible systems and applications. Currently I would say the clear winner is Markus Triska with 9 adoptions: - As of 2018, Norbert Zeh - As of 2018, Andrej Bauer - As of 2018, José A. Alonso Jiménez - As of 2019, Adam Dingle - As of 2019, Dylan Schwesinger - As of 2020, Andrea Schwertner Charão - As of 2020, Alejandro Guerra Hernández - As of 2021, Ilkka Kokkarinen - As of 2025, Wang-Zhou Dai https://github.com/triska/the-power-of-prolog So it currently stands at 9:0 for Triska vs Hermenegildo. Bye Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > Who will win the new Prolog race? > SWI or Scryer? Is it enough that SWI-Prolog > has teamed up with Ciao Prolog? > > What about resources that really can > code a Prolog systems. SWI-Prolog is > now doomed to have professional moron > > Julio Di Egidio on board. Not sure whether > he will ever become a heavy committer to > SWI-Prolog source. But who knows, we should > > also give Julio Di Egidio a chance. My > gut feeling at the moment: > > - SWI-Prolog: > Pull Requests 10 Open / 560 Closed > > - Scryer Prolog: > Pull Requests 40 Open / 751 Closed > > In the past I would measure active committers. > But the new "liveness" indicator of a Prolog > system could be indeed Pull Requests. > > So who will win? > > P.S.: Data sources: > > https://github.com/mthom/scryer-prolog/pulls > > https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/swipl-devel/pulls >
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Who will win the new Prolog race? SWI or Scryer? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-09-28 08:57 +0200
The only problem is, Rust is shiiiit (Was: Who will win the new Prolog race? SWI or Scryer?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-09-28 09:01 +0200
Recent hybrid: Python beats Rust (Was: The only problem is, Rust is shiiiit) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-09-28 09:13 +0200
Trealla drastically beats Scryer [Jaffar's Algorithm] (Re: Who will win the new Prolog race? SWI or Scryer? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-09-29 12:19 +0200
Boris the Loris and the American Fuzzy Lop (Was: Trealla drastically beats Scryer [Jaffar's Algorithm]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-09-29 12:54 +0200
Was Boris living under a rock, how many Fuzzy Testing tools? (Was: Boris the Loris and the American Fuzzy Lop) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-09-29 12:59 +0200
Not a Nazi-Retard, maybe a payed Troll on Putins payroll (Was: Was Boris living under a rock, how many Fuzzy Testing tools?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-09-29 13:07 +0200
Boris / EricGT: Why dont you tap into TAP? (Was: Boris the Loris and the American Fuzzy Lop) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-18 23:00 +0100
Closing the abstract interpretation GAP (Re: Boris / EricGT: Why dont you tap into TAP?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-18 23:12 +0100
Fast, but not correct implementation (Was: Trealla drastically beats Scryer [Jaffar's Algorithm]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-09-30 21:39 +0200
Boris the Loris saw it all comming [Weak Prolog Community] (Was: Fast, but not correct implementation) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-09-30 21:53 +0200
War between Scryer Prolog and Ciao Prolog [9:0 Triska vs Hermenegildo] (Was: Who will win the new Prolog race? SWI or Scryer?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-19 12:49 +0100
Useless as the Thirty Years War / Generalized Facts (Was: War between Scryer Prolog and Ciao Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-19 13:11 +0100
The Guerilla tactics of SWI are amazing: Shell India? (Was: Who will win the new Prolog race? SWI or Scryer?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-24 15:22 +0100
The SWI7 exotism (dicts, etc..) has no value? (Was: The Guerilla tactics of SWI are amazing: Shell India?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-24 15:41 +0100
My new TinyCLP is much faster [100% Prolog] (Was: The SWI7 exotism (dicts, etc..) has no value?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-24 21:27 +0100
Railgun CLP versus Scryer Prolog [Euler #30 Variant] (Was: Who will win the new Prolog race?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-01-30 02:10 +0100
csiph-web