Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get

From	JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, sci.physics, alt.alien.research
Subject	Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get
Date	2025-11-12 00:44 -0500
Organization	Eek
Message-ID	<10f16sm$17thi$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <10etmgf$abqr$1@dont-email.me> <10etqsn$becs$3@dont-email.me> <10f007j$u5ja$1@dont-email.me> <10f0358$v40b$1@dont-email.me> <10f0kcf$14576$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/11/25 7:29 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

> My undergraduate degree

Higher ed is already facing a lot of heat right now. They
don't need you dragging it through the mud.

> As with so many things, one cannot, at least on empirical grounds, 
> "prove a negative".

We don't have to. Retrocausality is the inescapable conclusion
here. It must exist. Information must travel backwards in time,
and does.

According to Einstein, we don't just perceive a movement
backwards in time, our perception is reality. It's a different
reality than that of the photon but the photon's reality is
also correct. For it. Just not us.

I'm guessing that it's your inability to wrap your little
disordered mind around this one fact that is preventing you
from moving forward.

-- 
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5

Thread

Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-10 13:11 -0500
  Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-10 15:46 -0600
    Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-10 18:01 -0500
      Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 12:45 -0600
        Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 14:35 -0500
          Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 18:29 -0600
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 20:40 -0700
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Vincent Maycock <ma.ycock@gm.ail.com> - 2025-11-11 20:55 -0800
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 23:35 -0600
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 00:44 -0500
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get "Henderson" <henderson@e.mail> - 2025-11-12 14:05 +0000
          Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-11-11 19:44 -0700
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 00:35 -0500
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-11-12 01:42 -0700
                Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 11:27 -0500
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get "Henderson" <henderson@e.mail> - 2025-11-12 14:04 +0000
          Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get "Henderson" <henderson@e.mail> - 2025-11-12 16:42 +0000

csiph-web