Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.skeptic > #115353
| From | JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, soc.history |
| Subject | How Time Travel is probable |
| Date | 2025-10-23 00:53 -0400 |
| Organization | Eek |
| Message-ID | <10dccck$19ei4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
Traditionally it's taught that, though theoretically possible, time travel is effectively impossible. But only for humans! Tachyons! They're a particle that theoretically exist, these Tachyons, and they do smash the time barrier! Tachyons are a hypothetical/theoretical particle that moves faster than light and hence backwards in time. If they do exist, or can exist, then even if humans can't move backwards through time our information can! We can send messages to the past! How far back? No clue. So, assuming Tachyons are real then how does that help us beat time? #1. Well. It all starts with detection. We need a means to detect Tachyons. If Techyons are real then we should be able to detect them, eventually. NOTE: We do NOT have to detect Tachyons directly! "Detecting" Tachyons means we have to know that they're there, perhaps their direction and number but it does NOT mean we have to be able to see them directly. An example of this is how we have often been unable to detect a planet directly, but could detect a dimming of a sun's light output as the planet passed in front of it. So we detected a dimming, and hence knew there was a planet present. According to Google AI, which I place zero faith in, Tachyons could be detected indirectly. WE can't see them, but we can see the result of them moving through space/matter... #2. Once Techyons are detectable, you set up Tachyon detectors. Spread them around, various "Safe" locations, maybe even place one in orbit or the moon! NOTE: Leave room! A thousand years from now somebody may want to set up a Tachyon generator right in front of your detector! They'll never reach the detector, because they'll travel back in time, perhaps reaching your detector in the past! #3. Figure out how to generate Tachyons. NOTE: This doesn't have to happen right away. Once you have an accurate, reliable detector, you can set that up and maybe start receiving messages from the future right away, and certainly prior to inventing a Tachyon generator! The messages are coming from the future. Doesn't matter what we can do in the present... #3. Figure out how to generate Tachyons. Ideally you're going to generate Tachyons in a controlled way. In other words, you can tap out Tachyons in a morse code or even a binary code! Now you can send messages backwards in time, though no further back than your first completed detector. #4. You know where the Tachyon detectors are, right? So start tapping out your messages to the past in morse code! Warn them about any coming attack, natural disaster or crisis. Send cures you've developed, technology you've developed and maybe even the identities of criminals? THE WORST problem in this scheme is that there may not be a significant difference in time. It's entirely possible you might be able to send a message at light speed to Mars and then have Mars send it back to earth via Tachyon only to arrive AFTER you sent it! But... At light speed, signals moving to & from Mars would take anywhere from 6 to 44 minutes round trip. Europa would require a 90 minute round trip.... but think of this: What if we get rid of people like Biden and replace them with leaders who prioritize science over foreign wars? We might actually get a mission to proxima centauri. Once we're talking LIGHT YEARS then even a small increase over light speed might shave months off of turn-around times! I'm guessing, and you can tell me if I'm wrong if you want but, I'm guessing that the greater the distance, the further back in time the Tachyons travel. If so... #5. Send information to as distant of a Tachyon detector as you can, and then have it send it back to you. So if you have a detector on proxima centauri, say, Tachyons might possibly arrive BEFORE you send them, and when they beam it back you' that will DOUBLE the time difference! Okay, so it would likely take you DECADES to move a Tachyon detector & emitter to proxima centauri. True. But you can still be utilizing it the whole way there! Right? At Apollo Mission speeds it took 3 days to reach the moon. So, in 6 days you could be twice as far as the moon! In 30 days you can be 10x the distance to the moon! And that's at 1960s Apollo Mission speeds! The whole time the craft is in motion, on it's journey, you could be using it. Your messages wouldn't go THAT far back in time, I'm guessing, or maybe they will. I'm honestly clueless about the nitty gritty here. I grasp the "Big Picture" and none of the minutia. But I would be willing to bet that the time-travel thing would start to show benefit long before a dector/emitter sent to a distant world even left our solar system... So, maybe we can send messages decades or centuries backwards in time, maybe we can send them in minutes. But think of this: Even if all we might do is cut transmission times in half, that shaves YEARS off a two-way message exchange between Earth and proxima centauri. What if we could send messages 15 minutes into our past? That alone might stop an assassination, a terrorist attack or a military strike. And unlike faster than light spaceships, messages that travel backwards in time are a real potential as we understand things. The principles are rather simplistic. We can easily generate electrons and photons. If we could figure out a way to generate faster than light particles, we're effectively done. That's it. -- https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
Back to sci.skeptic | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-23 00:53 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-10-23 11:25 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-10-23 09:29 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-10-23 11:33 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-10-23 09:58 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-23 13:26 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-24 01:00 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-24 14:01 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-25 00:55 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-25 21:46 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-26 04:51 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-26 13:05 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-10-26 12:38 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-26 15:20 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 14:04 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-27 00:32 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 11:35 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 20:03 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 22:56 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-28 01:06 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 13:24 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-29 01:21 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 22:17 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-30 13:29 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-10-29 03:16 -0600
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 13:43 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-10-30 06:35 -0600
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-30 08:53 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-10-30 08:49 -0600
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-30 16:20 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable x <x@x.org> - 2025-10-30 16:29 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-31 00:32 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable x <x@x.org> - 2025-10-31 14:19 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-31 17:35 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-10-30 23:06 -0600
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-31 06:16 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-10-29 16:06 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 22:23 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-30 01:27 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2025-10-30 05:52 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-30 15:01 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-28 01:06 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 07:46 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 13:19 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-29 01:20 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 22:16 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-30 13:29 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 07:11 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 13:32 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-30 01:26 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-10-30 09:44 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-30 15:02 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-29 01:20 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 06:21 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 13:26 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-29 01:21 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 22:22 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-28 01:05 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 07:51 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 06:23 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 13:16 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-29 01:20 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2025-10-29 09:45 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 13:28 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 22:13 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-30 13:29 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 13:28 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-29 01:22 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-27 00:31 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 11:33 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-28 01:04 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 13:29 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-29 01:22 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-29 13:36 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 22:11 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-30 13:29 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-31 00:27 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-31 01:21 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-31 06:21 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-11-01 03:50 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-10-31 05:51 -0600
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-31 08:25 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-11-01 03:51 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-30 02:24 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-30 13:29 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable x <x@x.org> - 2025-11-01 12:40 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-02 00:05 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable x <x@x.org> - 2025-11-04 02:18 -0800
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-04 14:58 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable x <x@x.org> - 2025-11-04 15:38 -0800
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-04 20:12 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable x <x@x.org> - 2025-11-04 18:08 -0800
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-04 23:48 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable x <x@x.org> - 2025-11-05 08:54 -0800
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-05 15:38 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable x <x@x.org> - 2025-11-06 10:11 -0800
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-06 15:52 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable x <x@x.org> - 2025-11-06 15:42 -0800
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-23 13:20 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.naw> - 2025-10-24 00:59 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-10-26 07:47 -0500
Re: How Time Travel is probable jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-10-23 21:22 +0000
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-23 19:09 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-10-24 18:51 +0000
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-24 17:47 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-10-25 15:31 +0000
Re: How Time Travel is probable JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-10-25 18:08 -0400
Re: How Time Travel is probable % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-10-23 22:17 -0700
Re: How Time Travel is probable x <x@x.org> - 2025-11-01 13:14 -0700
csiph-web