Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #188576
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] |
| Date | 2025-10-21 21:53 +1100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10d7omi$3robe$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <mll0arF484mU1@mid.individual.net> <10d3ln6$2o1jg$2@dont-email.me> <mlmnerFd132U2@mid.individual.net> <10d5ls1.m10.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <7gsislxk2c.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
On 21/10/2025 10:16 am, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-10-20 15:52, Frank Slootweg wrote: >>> I select text and then hit R (post followup). This way only the selected >>> text is quoted. I always figured one could see the difference between >>> the quote markers. I would either have to quote everything and then >>> start editing or add the attribution lines myself. >> As John indicated, the common method is to snip (with snip-marks) what >> you're not responding to. You do the reverse, only quote what you're >> responding to. >> >> Perhaps you could ask other (responsible) ForteAgent users, how they >> selectively quote while preserving the attribution lines. > > Thunderbird works the same, see above. > > I highlighted your two paragraph and the one before from s|b, hit follow > button. Everything else except the highlight gets removed. There is no > attribution to s|b. > > But everybody should know that the paragraph with single quotes doesn't > belong to Frank, it is obvious. > ... but, in your reply, as I read the quotes, "But everybody should know that the paragraph with single quotes (now double quotes) *does* belong to Frank." In this, my reply, your words, Carlos, have one set of '>' whilst Frank's (to which you, Carlos, responded) have two '>'. Or am I mis-understanding things?? -- Daniel70
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-16 12:39 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-10-16 09:58 -0500
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-10-16 17:55 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. Stan Brown <someone@example.com> - 2025-10-16 12:04 -0700
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-10-18 20:45 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. Stan Brown <someone@example.com> - 2025-10-19 09:55 -0700
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-10-19 22:34 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-10-19 22:37 +0100
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-10-20 14:15 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-10-20 13:52 +0000
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-10-20 16:14 +0200
OT: quoting (was: Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT]) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-10-20 15:22 +0100
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-21 01:16 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-10-21 21:53 +1100
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-21 21:56 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-10-21 14:37 +0100
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-21 21:59 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] Stan Brown <someone@example.com> - 2025-10-19 20:57 -0700
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-10-20 09:59 +0100
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] Stan Brown <someone@example.com> - 2025-10-20 07:32 -0700
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-10-20 14:13 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-10-20 14:03 +0000
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. [OT] Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-20 18:04 -0400
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-16 14:08 -0400
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. Jesper <Vitsky.kasperski@gmail.com> - 2025-10-16 20:24 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-10-16 20:35 +0200
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. Marion <marionf@fact.com> - 2025-10-17 02:15 +0000
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-10-16 14:08 -0400
Re: Site claims there is a simple way to keep W10 updated for EU users. Marion <marionf@fact.com> - 2025-10-17 00:59 +0000
csiph-web