Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.software.seamonkey > #8016

Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days.

Show all headers | View raw

Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2025-10-20, R Daneel Olivaw <Danni@hyperspace.vogon.gov> wrote:
> 
>> Ant wrote:
>>
>>> David E. Ross <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/19/2025 5:09 AM, frg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ant wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Reddit, LinkedIn, Disqus, etc. I have to use Firefox more these days. :(
>>>>>
>>>>> Can't help it. No help from more devs no fast updates. I use Vivaldi as a
>>>>> second browser. Even Firefox now stumbles on a few sites and Vivaldi is the
>>>>> most suite like.
>>>>
>>>> Whatever is done to fix this, PLEASE keep the ability to have .xpi-type
>>>> extensions.
>>>
>>> Is Vivaldi based on Mozilla's engines?
>>
>> No, it is Chromium based.
> 
> How safe is Chromium as compared to Chrome?  I'm trying to keep my
> life as Google-free as possible.
> 
> Currently I fall back to Firefox for sites that Seamonkey can't
> handle.  But I don't like it.  It was changes in the user interface
> in Firefox 29 that made me switch to Seamonkey in the first place.
> Do people recommend Vivaldi as a non-Google, non-Firefox alternative?
> 

Chromium is the Google engine.

The Brave browser - https://brave.com/ - is also Chromium based, but is 
probably the most secure variant around.  I'm not particularly keen on 
some of the decisions they made, but I keep it around for the rare cases 
where Firefox fails me (and I have FF for the cases where Seamonkey 
slips up).

Back to alt.comp.software.seamonkey | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2025-10-19 02:23 +0000
  Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> - 2025-10-19 14:09 +0200
    Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2025-10-19 09:45 -0700
      Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2025-10-20 05:12 +0000
        Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. frg <frgrahl@gmx.net> - 2025-10-20 12:11 +0200
          Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. David H Durgee <dhdurgee@privacy.net> - 2025-10-20 12:05 -0600
        Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. R Daneel Olivaw <Danni@hyperspace.vogon.gov> - 2025-10-20 12:12 +0200
          Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-20 18:01 +0000
            Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. R Daneel Olivaw <Danni@hyperspace.vogon.gov.invalid> - 2025-10-20 21:43 +0200
  Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. Yuchan Seo <hexagonwin@disroot.org> - 2025-10-26 03:07 +0900
    Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2025-10-27 01:06 +0000
      Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. Jack Kreidler <kreidlerjw@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 00:03 -0500
        Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2025-10-27 21:29 +0000
      Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. Yuchan Seo <hexagonwin@disroot.org> - 2025-10-28 08:13 +0900
  Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2025-11-13 18:30 +0000
    Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-11-13 18:09 -0600
      Re: It's sure getting harder to use SM for web browsing these days. Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-11-14 19:43 +1100

csiph-web