Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #187267
| From | "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop |
| Date | 2025-09-05 13:47 +0100 |
| Organization | 255 software |
| Message-ID | <109em4o$265sh$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <mhqrndFco8eU1@mid.individual.net> <1099j6r$16mlb$1@dont-email.me> <109buj8$1obgc$1@dont-email.me> <109cc9m$1ru76$1@dont-email.me> <109d0vv$21cua$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2025/9/4 22:40:14, Java Jive wrote: [] > I have ended up with the following sort of arrangement, the numbering > roughly following the original order in which the photos were scanned, > rather than the more logical ordering I'd like to apply now, where it > would start at 1 in Series 1, Pic 1 and progress linearly through all > those with people needing identification. > > +-------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ > | 55 56 | | 75 | | 1 3 | > | 57 | | 76 | | 2 4 | > | 58 | | | | 5 6 | > | | | | | 7 | > | | | | | | > +-------------+ ... +-------------+ ... +-------------+ ... > Series 1, Pic 1 ... Series 1, Pic 8 ... Series 2, Pic 1 ... What is your "end game"? Presumably all faces identified; but, do you still intend to publish the pictures with numbers on, and a key (because there's not room on the pictures to put actual names)? How is progress going: what do you see as the realistic probability of getting all, or say 90% (less than 10 faces unidentified)? If things _are_ progressing reasonably well, i. e. the amount of input you're getting is steadily whittling down the number of unidentifieds, then I _wouldn't_ renumber them: from your family's point of view, that'd just be confusing, however convenient it might be for _you_. How about, in the final - assuming there _isn't_ room to put full names - using initials instead (with an added digit for where there are duplicates, e. g. John Smith and Joe Soap)? You could use this in the intermediate stages too.> > Fortunately, because I'm using PaintShopPro, the numbers are in a > separate vector layer, and can be edited and moved about. When I'm Certainly, a layered scheme will make such manipulation easier. (The only such that _I_ have is Word; in the past, mainly with documents created by others, I've found its tendency to write text over pictures to be a pain, but I could see it actually being useful if I needed layers.) [] > interest in automating any part of the process I can. Particularly the > renumbering, but I don't know of any way of doing it automatically > across even one photo/image, let alone a whole series of them. > I'm still not really grasping what it is you want to automate, probably because I'm not sure how many pictures we're talking about; your use of "Series" above suggests it's a lot more than I had imagined. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf when people say they're perfectly happy without children, we don't have to presume they're lying! - Paul Dolan, RT 2015/1/3-9
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Fokke Nauta <fnauta@solfon.nl> - 2025-09-03 14:47 +0200
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop rsutton <rsutton43@comcast.net> - 2025-09-03 09:16 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-09-03 09:19 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop invalid <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-03 13:23 +0000
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-09-04 03:14 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop wasbit <wasbit@REMOVEhotmail.com> - 2025-09-04 09:37 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-09-03 10:26 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-09-03 10:29 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-09-03 17:40 +0000
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Abandoned Trolley <that.bloke@microsoft.com> - 2025-09-04 15:23 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-09-05 02:45 +0000
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-09-04 03:17 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-09-04 12:53 +0100
Identifying people in pictures Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-09-04 14:18 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-09-04 11:47 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-09-04 22:40 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-09-05 03:30 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-09-05 13:47 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-09-06 11:27 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-09-06 08:45 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-09-06 17:51 +0100
Photo Management (Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-09-12 13:30 +0000
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2025-09-06 09:34 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-09-06 16:15 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-09-06 16:31 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-09-06 20:11 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2025-09-06 15:30 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2025-09-06 15:27 +0200
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-09-06 15:42 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Herbert Kleebauer <klee@unibwm.de> - 2025-09-06 18:31 +0200
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2025-09-03 12:33 -0500
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-09-04 14:48 +0200
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-09-04 12:00 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2025-09-04 12:58 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-09-04 13:56 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2025-09-04 12:06 -0500
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-09-04 13:41 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-09-04 20:18 +0200
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2025-09-04 15:32 -0500
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2025-09-03 14:34 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Fokke Nauta <fnauta@solfon.nl> - 2025-09-03 20:40 +0200
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-09-03 20:58 +0000
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2025-09-03 19:10 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-09-04 20:20 +0200
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop wasbit <wasbit@REMOVEhotmail.com> - 2025-09-04 09:45 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Zaidy036 <Zaidy036@air.isp.spam> - 2025-09-03 15:57 -0400
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop invalid <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-03 21:14 +0000
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-09-04 06:54 +0000
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-09-03 21:19 +0000
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Philip Herlihy <nothing@invalid.com> - 2025-09-04 11:39 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-03 14:37 -0700
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-09-03 17:17 -0500
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Jim the Geordie <jim@geordieland.com> - 2025-09-04 00:55 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-09-04 02:56 +0100
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-09-04 06:39 +0000
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop jetjock <jetjock@unkown.com> - 2025-09-04 09:24 -0500
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-09-05 10:17 +0200
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop George <hgrikmnhb@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-06 20:56 +0000
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-09-06 18:09 -0500
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Fokke Nauta <fnauta@solfon.nl> - 2025-09-07 09:32 +0200
Re: OT: Replacement for Adobe Photoshop Fokke Nauta <fnauta@solfon.nl> - 2025-09-05 19:41 +0200
csiph-web