Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #186977
| From | Marion <marion@facts.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.windows7.general, alt.comp.software.firefox |
| Subject | Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? |
| Date | 2025-08-24 18:19 +0000 |
| Organization | BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) |
| Message-ID | <108fl2l$2tef$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <10899b7$2hga$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <MPG.43137e0668bee1f099043e@news.individual.net> <108ehqo$2m6b7$2@dont-email.me> <108faba$1iho$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <108fgn2$2gija$5@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 18:04:34 +0100, J. P. Gilliver wrote : > The truth is you never get what you pay for. >> a. You get what you get (which you need to understand what it is). >> b. And the dumber you are, the more you will pay for it. > > ... and b is true, and the latter part of a. But there is in _some_ > cases some truth in the old saying. An approximation that works a lot of > the time (nothing beats proper research, but if you're in a hurry) is to > assume it's rubbish if there is heavy marketing of the more expensive > product. But remember, in most cases it costs more to _make_ a better > product (whether a cookie/biscuit or a piece of software), so it is > reasonable to assume that will be reflected in the price - _unless_ > there is marketing that has to be paid for. Yes, but is a diamond-encrusted Rolex really a better watch than a Timex? What matters most is how well it tells time - and the Timex wins that spec. People let marketing tell them what matters, e.g., some people actually buy a RED!!!!!!!!!! iPhone, which, let's face it, isn't better than black ones. Marketing's job is to differentiate the product. Any way they can. Generally, almost all products are commodities. If not commodities, then they're differentiated by specs. But you have to know what "spec" matters. For example, on a battery, the spec is the "juice" that it outputs. Not the warranty. The warranty is a marketing gimmick. Much like biometrics are on mobile devices. I'm on a lot of tech forums, where, for example, people think that whatever marketing people advertise, "must" be true, e.g., a battery with a 2-year warranty must be better (and more expensive) than one with no warranty. A "blue" coolant for European cars must be better than the "pink" for Japanese or the "green" for American cars. If they put a spec of sand in a brake pad versus a spec of copper, then it immediately becomes a fancy ceramic pad versus a metallic pad (both versus non-asbestos organic), when what really matters is the cold/hot friction rating which is required, by law, to be printed on every package in the USA for brake pads. But even the car parts guys don't understand friction coefficients (even as that's what brake pads do!) so everyone talks about the absurd meaningless perceived (yet imaginary) differences between metallic & ceramic & organic. Everyone is desperate for a number line to make decisions and MARKETING is always glad to hand you a "good/better/best" number line. But what really matters in good/better/best is the specifications. But most people can't handle the fact that things have specs. Which, is why, as I noted, that people think that the number line of premium gas being fifty cents more expensive means that it's better. And yet, it's not. It's worse (for most engines). But not measurably worse. Still, the fifty cents per gallon uptick is a waste of money. Because it's not better at all. Which is my point. The less someone knows about a product, the more they succumb to marketing.
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> - 2025-08-19 16:35 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> - 2025-08-19 16:47 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2025-08-19 07:59 -0700
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-19 22:37 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> - 2025-10-18 12:04 -0700
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-10-18 20:57 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-10-19 10:08 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> - 2025-12-13 20:32 -0800
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-14 20:24 +1100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-12-14 11:05 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-19 16:06 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2025-08-19 11:21 -0500
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-19 18:20 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2025-08-19 18:12 -0500
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-08-19 15:20 -0500
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-20 00:24 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 12:27 -0400
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? YT user<invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-19 16:34 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-19 18:24 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@somewhere.someplaceelse> - 2025-08-20 21:05 +1000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-20 13:04 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-19 21:59 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 02:45 +0800
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> - 2025-08-19 20:50 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-19 23:35 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-19 22:14 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-20 02:25 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-20 04:07 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-20 13:39 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@somewhere.someplaceelse> - 2025-08-20 21:57 +1000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-20 14:26 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@somewhere.someplaceelse> - 2025-08-20 23:00 +1000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-20 15:45 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@somewhere.someplaceelse> - 2025-08-21 20:27 +1000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-22 08:22 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Stan Brown <someone@example.com> - 2025-08-23 08:28 -0700
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-23 16:49 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-23 21:17 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-23 23:37 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-24 03:38 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-24 03:05 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-24 15:49 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-24 15:05 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-24 17:56 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-24 17:58 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-24 20:31 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-24 18:44 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-24 23:53 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-25 03:28 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-25 14:00 +0200
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-25 16:51 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? wasbit <wasbit@REMOVEhotmail.com> - 2025-08-25 09:41 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-25 16:52 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-24 17:50 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-24 17:57 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-25 04:28 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-25 14:03 +0200
YouTube subscribes (was: Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"??) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-25 16:16 +0100
Re: YouTube subscribes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-25 20:24 +0200
Re: YouTube subscribes "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-25 21:47 +0100
Re: YouTube subscribes Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> - 2025-08-26 01:04 +0200
Re: YouTube subscribes "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-26 04:32 +0100
Re: YouTube subscribes Daniel70 <daniel47@somewhere.someplaceelse> - 2025-08-26 19:17 +1000
Re: YouTube subscribes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-26 14:54 +0200
Re: YouTube subscribes Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-08-26 11:33 +0100
Re: YouTube subscribes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-26 15:09 +0200
Re: YouTube subscribes Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-08-26 17:02 +0100
Re: YouTube subscribes "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-26 19:56 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? james moffat <spam.spam@distributel.net> - 2025-08-24 12:47 -0600
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-24 22:40 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? james moffat <spam.spam@distributel.net> - 2025-08-25 11:29 -0600
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-25 22:02 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? james moffat <spam.spam@distributel.net> - 2025-08-25 16:28 -0600
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@somewhere.someplaceelse> - 2025-08-26 19:47 +1000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? james moffat <spam.spam@distributel.net> - 2025-08-26 10:31 -0600
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-26 20:24 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@somewhere.someplaceelse> - 2025-08-27 16:01 +1000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? wasbit <wasbit@REMOVEhotmail.com> - 2025-08-25 09:28 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? wasbit <wasbit@REMOVEhotmail.com> - 2025-08-24 09:17 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-24 15:15 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-24 18:04 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-24 18:19 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-08-25 05:10 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> - 2025-12-13 20:20 -0800
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-14 20:28 +1100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> - 2025-12-16 22:18 -0800
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> - 2025-12-13 20:16 -0800
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-12-14 00:16 -0500
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-12-14 14:20 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-12-14 14:06 -0500
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> - 2025-12-16 22:12 -0800
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-14 20:31 +1100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> - 2025-12-16 22:13 -0800
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-12-14 10:48 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-14 23:21 +1100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-12-14 14:17 -0500
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-08-19 15:21 -0500
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? wasbit <wasbit@REMOVEhotmail.com> - 2025-08-20 09:45 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? wasbit <wasbit@REMOVEhotmail.com> - 2025-08-20 10:00 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-20 16:05 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? wasbit <wasbit@REMOVEhotmail.com> - 2025-08-21 09:04 +0100
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-22 08:13 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-08-25 13:40 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-25 16:51 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-22 07:30 +0000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Daniel70 <daniel47@somewhere.someplaceelse> - 2025-08-22 20:37 +1000
Re: YouTube : "Sign in to confirm you're not a bot"?? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-22 19:38 +0000
csiph-web