Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math |
| Subject | Performance of Mercio’s Total Order (Re: Mercios decidability was already attested in 2012) |
| Date | 2025-08-15 23:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <107oa45$3c0p$3@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <106p0ct$3b6se$3@solani.org> <107lai9$1hn9$2@solani.org> |
You can use Fuzzy Testing also for
benchmarking. Not only to find faults.
For example when I benchmark mercio/3 via
fuzzy/1, I find it doesn’t fare extremly bad:
?- time((between(1,100,_), mercio, fail; true)).
% 4,386,933 inferences, 0.375 CPU in 0.376 seconds (100% CPU, 11698488 Lips)
true.
And I am not using some of the optimization
that @kuniaki.mukai posted elsewhere and that
I posted 06.08.2025 on comp.lang.prolog. Fact is,
it only ca. 20% slower than SWI-Prologs compare/3:
?- time((between(1,100,_), swi, fail; true)).
% 3,786,880 inferences, 0.312 CPU in 0.325 seconds (96% CPU, 12118016 Lips)
true.
The test harness was:
swi :-
between(1,1000,_),
fuzzy(X), fuzzy(Y),
swi(_, X, Y), fail; true.
mercio :-
between(1,1000,_),
fuzzy(X), fuzzy(Y),
mercio(_, X, Y), fail; true.
The difficulty was to find a 100% Prolog compare/3
that corresponds to SWI-Prolog. But you find a
fresh implementation in 100% Prolog using a Union
Find structure in the below:
% swi(-Atom, +Term, +Term)
swi(C, X, Y) :-
swi(X, Y, C, [], _).
% swi( -Atom, +Term, +Term,+List, -List)
swi(C, X, Y, L, R) :- compound(X), compound(Y), !,
sys_union_find(X, L, Z),
sys_union_find(Y, L, T),
swi_found(C, Z, T, L, R).
swi(X, Y, C, L, L) :- compare(C, X, Y).
% swi_found(-Atom, +Term, +Term, +List, -List)
swi_found(C, X, Y, L, L) :-
same_term(X, Y), !, C = (=).
swi_found(C, X, Y, _, _) :-
functor(X, F, N),
functor(Y, G, M),
compare(D, N/F, M/G),
D \== (=), !, C = D.
swi_found(C, X, Y, L, R) :-
X =.. [_|P],
Y =.. [_|Q],
foldl(swi(C), P, Q, [X-Y|L], R).
% sys_union_find(+Term, +List, -Term)
sys_union_find(X, L, T) :-
member(Y-Z, L),
same_term(X, Y), !,
sys_union_find(Z, L, T).
sys_union_find(X, _, X).
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-04 02:54 +0200
The Original Ganster (OG) of Gameification: IEEE 1044.1-1995 (Re: Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-04 13:50 +0200
The Bitrot called Math Stack Exchange (Re: The Original Ganster (OG) of Gameification: IEEE 1044.1-1995) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-04 13:57 +0200
I guess its back to Hopcroft and Karp (Re: The Bitrot called Math Stack Exchange) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-04 14:12 +0200
Szpilrajn Theorem and Suzumura Consistency (Re: Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 01:53 +0200
The good thing is we have at least Mercio’s Algorithm (Re: Szpilrajn Theorem and Suzumura Consistency) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 08:09 +0200
Hopcroft and Karp’s is just Contraction (Re: The good thing is we have at least Mercio’s Algorithm) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 08:16 +0200
Re: Hopcroft and Karp’s is just Contraction (Re: The good thing is we have at least Mercio’s Algorithm) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 08:23 +0200
Mercios decidability was already attested in 2012 (Re: Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-14 20:40 +0200
Performance of Mercio’s Total Order (Re: Mercios decidability was already attested in 2012) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-15 23:51 +0200
Fuzzy Testing is your Swiss Knife (Was: Performance of Mercio’s Total Order) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-15 23:54 +0200
Yeah, we have another name! (Re: Fuzzy Testing is your Swiss Knife) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-16 12:40 +0200
Monte Carlo sampling the frontier version (Re: Yeah, we have another name!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-16 12:44 +0200
An NPU could give 1000x more LIPS (Re: Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-27 14:23 +0100
Zeus: A Language for Expressing Algorithms in Hardware (Re: Neural Network based dif/2 respectively (#\=)/2) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-27 15:02 +0100
100% serious Giga Logical Inferences per Second (GLIPS) (Re: An NPU could give 1000x more LIPS (Re: Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-28 14:53 +0100
csiph-web