Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14767
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Should we use minimum_coa/3 ? (Was: The good thing is we have at least Mercio’s Algorithm) |
| Date | 2025-08-08 23:45 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1075r4t$3k4fi$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <106p08a$3b6se$1@solani.org> <106u5bj$3bpia$1@solani.org> <106urkg$3c5n2$3@solani.org> |
You have the habit to post incomplete code: bfs_sort(X, Y):- minimum_coa(X, Is, Mcoa), My friend, where did you hide the predicate minimum_coa/3 ? Also its irrelevant to mercio/3 or any frontier method. The TRUNCATIONS are the same either with or without a canonical form as input. The only thing that might be a little faster is the (==)/2 pretest in mercio/3, and short cuts like here profit also: fpl_compare(C, [I-J|F], FPL, FPL0, Mcoa):- ( I = J -> fpl_compare(C, F, FPL, FPL0, Mcoa) But practically one could also use same_term/2 and gain some speed. But given that minimum_coa/3 can be quite expensive, I don’t count this as the real mercio/3 sorting method. If sorting is O(N * log(N)) for a fast compare but minimum_coa/3 is O(N^2), not much is gained, rather contra productive. Thats basically why bisimiliarity was invented by Hopcroft and Carp and reported in their 1971 paper to avoid the trap of doing equality via expensive canonical form.
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-04 02:52 +0200
The Original Ganster (OG) of Gameification: IEEE 1044.1-1995 (Was: Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-04 13:48 +0200
The Bitrot called Math Stack Exchange (Re: The Original Ganster (OG) of Gameification: IEEE 1044.1-1995) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-04 14:00 +0200
I guess its back to Hopcroft and Karp.Re: The Bitrot called Math Stack Exchange) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-04 14:11 +0200
Szpilrajn Theorem and Suzumura Consistency (Was: Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 01:50 +0200
The good thing is we have at least Mercio’s Algorithm (Re: Szpilrajn Theorem and Suzumura Consistency) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 08:10 +0200
Hopcroft and Karp’s is just Contraction (Was: The good thing is we have at least Mercio’s Algorithm) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 08:13 +0200
Re: Hopcroft and Karp’s is just Contraction (Was: The good thing is we have at least Mercio’s Algorithm) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 08:23 +0200
Should we use minimum_coa/3 ? (Was: The good thing is we have at least Mercio’s Algorithm) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-08 23:45 +0200
Perfectly balanced , as all things should be! (Was: Should we use minimum_coa/3 ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-08 23:49 +0200
Mercios decidability was already attested in 2012 (Was: Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-14 20:26 +0200
Performance of Mercio’s Total Order (Was: Mercios decidability was already attested in 2012) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-15 23:49 +0200
Fuzzy Testing is your Swiss Knife (Re: Performance of Mercio’s Total Order) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-15 23:55 +0200
Yeah, we have another name! (Was: Fuzzy Testing is your Swiss Knife) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-16 12:38 +0200
Monte Carlo sampling the frontier version (Was: Yeah, we have another name!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-16 12:42 +0200
AI most hated by formal verification (Was: Fuzzy Testing is your Swiss Knife) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-26 17:02 +0100
An NPU could give 1000x more LIPS (Was: Mercio’s Algorithm for Rational Tree Compare in Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-27 14:19 +0100
Neural Network based dif/2 respectively (#\=)/2 (Re: An NPU could give 1000x more LIPS) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-27 14:51 +0100
Zeus: A Language for Expressing Algorithms in Hardware (Re: Neural Network based dif/2 respectively (#\=)/2) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-27 15:03 +0100
Googles TPU muscle in 2017 [Prolog Community is Sleepy Joe] (Re: Zeus: A Language for Expressing Algorithms in Hardware) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-27 15:23 +0100
100% serious Giga Logical Inferences per Second (GLIPS) (Was: An NPU could give 1000x more LIPS) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-28 14:50 +0100
The tables have turned: GigaLIP on the Laptop? (Re: 100% serious Giga Logical Inferences per Second (GLIPS) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-28 15:12 +0100
csiph-web