Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14718

Bonus: Prolog Systems with Strings, Bigints, etc.. (Re: From Bisimulation to Bisimilarity: A Complete Inference System)

From Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.prolog
Subject Bonus: Prolog Systems with Strings, Bigints, etc.. (Re: From Bisimulation to Bisimilarity: A Complete Inference System)
Date 2025-07-21 23:04 +0200
Message-ID <105ma0p$2l38j$3@solani.org> (permalink)
References <105lbpa$2idvv$1@solani.org> <105m8r8$2l2n8$1@solani.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

My modelling for atomic Prolog types was a little
overkill, since most Prolog systems are still fond
of atom tables and stuff, but I had a edge with

label 0, between the adress of atomic Prolog type,
and the "value" of an atomic Prolog type. Ok
lets turn this overkill into a bonus:

 > So we can study two things under the same umbrella,
 > inside the bisimulation framework of Robin Milner:
 >
 > - Lower Level adresses, such as *1, *2, *3, etc..
 >
 > - Higher Level Prolog terms, such as f(a,b), a, b, etc..

Add the following item:

- Prolog Systems with Strings, Bigints, etc.. (*)

When atomic things with different adresses
can be still equal, but same_term/2 as
realized in SWI-Prolog might not give that

information. Don’t know what it does…

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> 
> Bisimilarity has an interesting history, I
> only figured out today. 1981 David Park
> mentioned it in a appendix “Unresolved problems.”
> 
> Concurrency and Automata on Infinite Sequences
> David Park - 1981
> https://scispace.com/pdf/concurrency-and-automata-on-infinite-sequences-3eilumrkv0.pdf 
> 
> 
> 1983 Robin Milner had a more grown up theory
> about it. With findings such as “Charts C1,
> and C2, are congruent if they possess a bisimulation;
> Congruence of charts is an equivalence relation.”
> 
> A Complete Inference System for a Class of Regular Behaviours
> Robin Milner - 1982
> https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/15159317/A_Complete_Inference_System_for_a_Class_of_Regular_Behaviours.pdf 
> 
> 
> But how view syntactic Prolog terms as
> infinte trees respective graphs. First of
> all you need graphs that are labeled in their
> edges, and also labeled in their nodes,
> 
> so take a term: f(a,b):
> 
>                      *1   (label f)
>                     /  \
>    (label 1)       /    \       (label 2)
>                   /      \
>    (label a)     *2       *3    (label b)
> 
> The *1, *2 and *3 are some memory addresses.
> The Robin Milner paper does bisimulation
> when there are labels in the edges, he
> doesn’t show bisimulation if there are
> labels in the vertices as well,
> 
> but one could use arg(0) for the functor,
> actually effectively most Prolog systems
> implement a compound as such, a Prolog compound
> f(a,b) is basically internally some tupel (f,a,b):
> 
>                   *1
>     (label 0)  /  |  \
>               /   |  (label 1)
>             /     |      \       (label 2)
>            f      *2      *3
>                   |        |
>        (label 0)  |        |    (label 0)
>                   |        |
>                   a        b
> 
> So we can study two things under the same
> umbrella, inside the bisimulation
> framework of Robin Milner:
> 
> - Lower Level adresses, such as *1, *2, *3, etc..
> 
> - Higher Level Prolog terms, such as f(a,b), a, b, etc..
> 
> Attention: The “Variables” in Robin Milners
> paper are not Prolog Variables, they are more
> like bread crumbs from Hänsel and Gretel,
> to flee the Witch from the Forest.
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Despite these efforts:
>>
>> The development of concurrent logic programming
>> was given an impetus when Guarded Horn Clause was
>> used to implement KL1, the systems programming
>> language of the Japanese Fifth Generation
>> Project (FGCS). The FGCS Project was a $400M
>> initiative by Japan's Ministry of International
>> Trade and Industry, begun in 1982, to use
>> massively parallel computing/processing for
>> artificial intelligence applications.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurrent_logic_programming
>>
>> And relation ship to rational trees, in
>> Alain Colmerauers WINDOW PRINCIPLE, mostlikely
>> Bisimulation has a more lasting impact.
>>
>> But who were the founding fathers of bisimulation?
>>
>> Robin Milner (1934–2010)
>> Primary founder of the concept of bisimulation. Introduced
>> the idea in the context of Calculus of Communicating
>> Systems (CCS) in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Bisimulation
>> became central to his work on concurrency theory. He won
>> the Turing Award in 1991, partly for this work.
>>
>> Gordon Plotkin
>> While not the originator of bisimulation itself,
>> Plotkin worked closely with Milner and contributed
>> significantly to the theoretical foundations of
>> operational semantics and domain theory, which
>> intersect with bisimulation.
>>
>> David Park
>> Credited with influencing the notion of bisimulation.
>> His unpublished manuscript (c. 1981) and personal
>> communications inspired Milner’s formalization.
>> He clarified the distinction between simulation
>> and bisimulation.
>>
>> Bye
>>
> 

Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Fathers of Bisimulation: Robin Milner (1934–2010) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 14:28 +0200
  From Bisimulation to Bisimilarity: A Complete Inference System (Was: Fathers of Bisimulation: Robin Milner (1934–2010)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 22:44 +0200
    Bonus: Prolog Systems with Strings, Bigints, etc.. (Re: From Bisimulation to Bisimilarity: A Complete Inference System) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 23:04 +0200
      At least 3 methods for Bisimilarity [Python BisPy] (Was: Bonus: Prolog Systems with Strings, Bigints, etc.. ) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 23:25 +0200
        sets or tuples? be warned (Re: At least 3 methods for Bisimilarity [Python BisPy]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 23:36 +0200
  The Original Ganster (OG) of Bisimilarity are Hopcroft and Karp (1971) (Re: Fathers of Bisimulation: Robin Milner (1934–2010)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-22 00:50 +0200
    All-in-One DAM-GT: Wuhan, Hopcroft and Attention (Was: The Original Ganster (OG) of Bisimilarity are Hopcroft and Karp (1971)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 15:10 +0200

csiph-web