Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14718
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Bonus: Prolog Systems with Strings, Bigints, etc.. (Re: From Bisimulation to Bisimilarity: A Complete Inference System) |
| Date | 2025-07-21 23:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <105ma0p$2l38j$3@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <105lbpa$2idvv$1@solani.org> <105m8r8$2l2n8$1@solani.org> |
Hi, My modelling for atomic Prolog types was a little overkill, since most Prolog systems are still fond of atom tables and stuff, but I had a edge with label 0, between the adress of atomic Prolog type, and the "value" of an atomic Prolog type. Ok lets turn this overkill into a bonus: > So we can study two things under the same umbrella, > inside the bisimulation framework of Robin Milner: > > - Lower Level adresses, such as *1, *2, *3, etc.. > > - Higher Level Prolog terms, such as f(a,b), a, b, etc.. Add the following item: - Prolog Systems with Strings, Bigints, etc.. (*) When atomic things with different adresses can be still equal, but same_term/2 as realized in SWI-Prolog might not give that information. Don’t know what it does… Bye Mild Shock schrieb: > > Bisimilarity has an interesting history, I > only figured out today. 1981 David Park > mentioned it in a appendix “Unresolved problems.” > > Concurrency and Automata on Infinite Sequences > David Park - 1981 > https://scispace.com/pdf/concurrency-and-automata-on-infinite-sequences-3eilumrkv0.pdf > > > 1983 Robin Milner had a more grown up theory > about it. With findings such as “Charts C1, > and C2, are congruent if they possess a bisimulation; > Congruence of charts is an equivalence relation.” > > A Complete Inference System for a Class of Regular Behaviours > Robin Milner - 1982 > https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/15159317/A_Complete_Inference_System_for_a_Class_of_Regular_Behaviours.pdf > > > But how view syntactic Prolog terms as > infinte trees respective graphs. First of > all you need graphs that are labeled in their > edges, and also labeled in their nodes, > > so take a term: f(a,b): > > *1 (label f) > / \ > (label 1) / \ (label 2) > / \ > (label a) *2 *3 (label b) > > The *1, *2 and *3 are some memory addresses. > The Robin Milner paper does bisimulation > when there are labels in the edges, he > doesn’t show bisimulation if there are > labels in the vertices as well, > > but one could use arg(0) for the functor, > actually effectively most Prolog systems > implement a compound as such, a Prolog compound > f(a,b) is basically internally some tupel (f,a,b): > > *1 > (label 0) / | \ > / | (label 1) > / | \ (label 2) > f *2 *3 > | | > (label 0) | | (label 0) > | | > a b > > So we can study two things under the same > umbrella, inside the bisimulation > framework of Robin Milner: > > - Lower Level adresses, such as *1, *2, *3, etc.. > > - Higher Level Prolog terms, such as f(a,b), a, b, etc.. > > Attention: The “Variables” in Robin Milners > paper are not Prolog Variables, they are more > like bread crumbs from Hänsel and Gretel, > to flee the Witch from the Forest. > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> Despite these efforts: >> >> The development of concurrent logic programming >> was given an impetus when Guarded Horn Clause was >> used to implement KL1, the systems programming >> language of the Japanese Fifth Generation >> Project (FGCS). The FGCS Project was a $400M >> initiative by Japan's Ministry of International >> Trade and Industry, begun in 1982, to use >> massively parallel computing/processing for >> artificial intelligence applications. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurrent_logic_programming >> >> And relation ship to rational trees, in >> Alain Colmerauers WINDOW PRINCIPLE, mostlikely >> Bisimulation has a more lasting impact. >> >> But who were the founding fathers of bisimulation? >> >> Robin Milner (1934–2010) >> Primary founder of the concept of bisimulation. Introduced >> the idea in the context of Calculus of Communicating >> Systems (CCS) in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Bisimulation >> became central to his work on concurrency theory. He won >> the Turing Award in 1991, partly for this work. >> >> Gordon Plotkin >> While not the originator of bisimulation itself, >> Plotkin worked closely with Milner and contributed >> significantly to the theoretical foundations of >> operational semantics and domain theory, which >> intersect with bisimulation. >> >> David Park >> Credited with influencing the notion of bisimulation. >> His unpublished manuscript (c. 1981) and personal >> communications inspired Milner’s formalization. >> He clarified the distinction between simulation >> and bisimulation. >> >> Bye >> >
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fathers of Bisimulation: Robin Milner (1934–2010) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 14:28 +0200
From Bisimulation to Bisimilarity: A Complete Inference System (Was: Fathers of Bisimulation: Robin Milner (1934–2010)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 22:44 +0200
Bonus: Prolog Systems with Strings, Bigints, etc.. (Re: From Bisimulation to Bisimilarity: A Complete Inference System) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 23:04 +0200
At least 3 methods for Bisimilarity [Python BisPy] (Was: Bonus: Prolog Systems with Strings, Bigints, etc.. ) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 23:25 +0200
sets or tuples? be warned (Re: At least 3 methods for Bisimilarity [Python BisPy]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 23:36 +0200
The Original Ganster (OG) of Bisimilarity are Hopcroft and Karp (1971) (Re: Fathers of Bisimulation: Robin Milner (1934–2010)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-22 00:50 +0200
All-in-One DAM-GT: Wuhan, Hopcroft and Attention (Was: The Original Ganster (OG) of Bisimilarity are Hopcroft and Karp (1971)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 15:10 +0200
csiph-web