Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #894090
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Julio: How to sort rational trees in Prolog? (Was: How to formalize dependent setoid morphisms?) |
| Date | 2025-07-20 23:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <105jmoa$2hg7d$4@solani.org> (permalink) |
Hi, Some people like Juglio post references to wonderful meandering along terminology like: > If X has decidable equality and negation > of equality is an apartness relation, then > the negation of equality is a (in fact the > unique) decidable tight apartness relation > on X, and any function from X to any set > Y with a tight apartness relation on Y > must be strongly extensional. https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/strongly+extensional+function#examples Still they are clueless how to sort rational trees in Prolog. I am pretty sure such people don't know how to do it practically in a Prolog system. Bye Julio Di Egidio schrieb: > In fact, how to constructive mathematics a la Bishop. > > I haven't got to the bottom of it, it turns out to be > a long term project in itself, for both theoretical and > technical reasons, but here are few notes and mainly the > references that I have managed to collect. > > "How to formalize dependent setoid morphisms?" > <https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/2759> > > To be continued... > > -Julio
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Julio: How to sort rational trees in Prolog? (Was: How to formalize dependent setoid morphisms?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-20 23:23 +0200
csiph-web