Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.logic > #340577

Having 2544 issues is probably a bad sign (Was: Maybe AGI should take over proving)

From Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups sci.logic
Subject Having 2544 issues is probably a bad sign (Was: Maybe AGI should take over proving)
Date 2025-07-15 18:34 +0200
Message-ID <1055vv3$2940k$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References <104oa2l$r4na$2@dont-email.me> <104obqh$r4na$3@dont-email.me> <1055voq$293rt$1@solani.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

Having 2544 issues is probably a bad sign.
I find this many issues here:

https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/issues

Mostlikely 90% of the issues can be move to
the new discussion feature of GitHub.

LoL

Bye

P.S.: Same holds for Scryer Prolog with 406 issues.

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> Maybe AGI should take over proving.
> Just take the humans out of the loop
> of any programming, it leads to nowhere.
> 
> Bye
> 
> Julio Di Egidio schrieb:
>> On 10/07/2025 14:01, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>> The end of the world is nigh:
>>>
>>> <https://rocq-prover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/237656-Rocq-devs-.26-plugin-devs/topic/status.20and.20future.20of.20the.20phase.20split/near/528029103> 
>>>
>>>
>>>  From interactive proof assistant to completely upside-down and
>>> completely broken, and not just on that at that point of course.
>>>
>>> And the fucking shamelessness...
>>
>> But we must thank MS for the nail in that coffin, too: they can't
>> be satisfied with just a Lean broken by design, they must own the
>> whole compartment: only poisoned meatballs for the public...
>>
>> -Julio
>>
> 

Back to sci.logic | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Coq/Rocq and how to completely break it Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-07-10 14:01 +0200
  Re: Coq/Rocq and how to completely break it Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-07-10 14:31 +0200
    Maybe AGI should take over proving (Was: Coq/Rocq and how to completely break it) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 18:31 +0200
      Having 2544 issues is probably a bad sign (Was: Maybe AGI should take over proving) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 18:34 +0200
        The Signal Collapse gives us System Uncertainty (Was: Having 2544 issues is probably a bad sign) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 19:01 +0200
    Re: Coq/Rocq and how to completely break it Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-11-30 09:52 +0100
      Re: Coq/Rocq and how to completely break it Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-11-30 10:00 +0100
      SWI Agent Provocateur gets kicked out of Rocq? (Re: Coq/Rocq and how to completely break it) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 10:28 +0100
        How to get GigaLIPS for Transitive Closure (Was: SWI Agent Provocateur gets kicked out of Rocq?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 11:20 +0100
          I am already using this method for 20 years [AI Effloreszenz] (Was: How to get GigaLIPS for Transitive Closure) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 11:32 +0100
            New branding Accelerated Linear Algebra [OpenXLA C++] (Was: I am already using this method for 20 years) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 11:43 +0100
        When put in virtual jail, ask for removal of your content (Was: SWI Agent Provocateur gets kicked out of Rocq?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 12:55 +0100

csiph-web