Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14660
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Can CLAM do bidrectional rounding? (Was: Australian Longest Straight Road in Prolog) |
| Date | 2025-07-14 16:15 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <10533em$27d2s$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <1050bga$26p4p$1@solani.org> <1050c8d$26pg6$1@solani.org> <1050d61$26q6h$1@solani.org> <1050dhh$26qc0$1@solani.org> <1053362$27ctr$1@solani.org> |
The conversion factor in the units database is: ?- qeval(X*1 is mi/km). X = 1.609344. I had first used 1.60934, but then used 1.609344. But I think this here is not a symmetric answer, and a symmetric answer using constraint logic programming maybe impossible: ?- qeval((145.6*km =:= 90*usc:mile+quantity Eps, SIEps is Eps in km)). Eps = 0.4716455897558234*kind_of(isq:length)[usc:mile], SIEps = 0.7590399999999958*kind_of(isq:length)[si:kilo(si:metre)]. Do you have intervals associated with units, so you can write “in km”? I computes 145.6*km - 90*mile in terms of km, so it computes: /* Windows 11 Calcultator */ 145.6 - 90*1.609344 = 0.75904 /* SWI-Prolog Evaluator */ ?- X is 145.6 - 90*1.609344. X = 0.7590399999999988 So to be correctly rounded to one digit after the period, the eps would need to be smaller. But for the other direction, whether the conversion from km to mile was correct, I guess a 2nd query would be needed. But still I would be interested whether constraint logic programming can answer such questions in one query, like whether CLAM (the idea of Constraint Logic Abstract Machines) has a rounding bidirectionality? Giving new momentum to the dream that CLAM is a silver bullet. Mild Shock schrieb: > Do these units packages define rounding? Is this correct: > > https://www.shutterstock.com/de/image-photo/road-sign-longest-straight-australia-548866177 > > > I think one way its correct: > > 145.6 km ÷ 1.609344 km/mile = 90.47 miles > > The other way its incorrect: > > 90 miles × 1.609344 km/mile = 144.84 km > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> So how does academic purity compare to industrial >> success? Well this talk by Martin Odersky has some >> interesting slides comparing past and present: >> >> Evolving Scala by Martin Odersky | Scalar Conference 2025 >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI0NOh9r1f8 >> >> Where Scala ranked in 2014, versus where Scala >> ranks in 2025. Haskell gone, Clojure gone. >> >> LoL >> >> Bye
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
comp.lang.prolog Frequently Asked Questions Markus Triska <triska@logic.at> - 2024-11-16 05:58 +0000
Amzi! Retirement: 2026 is only next year (Was: comp.lang.prolog Frequently Asked Questions) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-13 15:11 +0200
What does the "Red Tape" on Wayback Machine mean? (Was: Amzi! Retirement: 2026 is only next year) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-13 15:14 +0200
Prolog can keep up with the AI Boom [Forget about CLAM] (Was: What does the "Red Tape" on Wayback Machine mean?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-13 15:27 +0200
The cult of CLAM / Clojure rewrite utility (Was: Prolog can keep up with the AI Boom [Forget about CLAM]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-13 15:43 +0200
Australian Longest Straight Road in Prolog (Was: Clojure hasn't gained momentum [Martin Odersky 2025 Talk]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-14 16:11 +0200
Can CLAM do bidrectional rounding? (Was: Australian Longest Straight Road in Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-14 16:15 +0200
Pointed intervals to the rescue [Make CLAM great again] (Was: Can CLAM do bidrectional rounding?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 01:26 +0200
Corr. Re: Pointed intervals to the rescue [Make CLAM great again] (Was: Can CLAM do bidrectional rounding?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 01:28 +0200
Sleepy Joe SWI-Prolog still waiting for a PR (Was: Prolog can keep up with the AI Boom [Forget about CLAM]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-12 01:26 +0100
deep preprocessor =\= term_expansion and/or goal_expansion [SWI-Prolog dicts] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-12 02:18 +0100
There is something like SuperPrologs ? [SWI, ECLiPSe, etc..] (Was: comp.lang.prolog Frequently Asked Questions) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 13:24 +0200
Is ISO itself not simply a dialect? (Was: There is something like SuperPrologs ? [SWI, ECLiPSe, etc..]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 13:26 +0200
Pet project Prolog-Omnibus I don't have any time (Was: Is ISO itself not simply a dialect?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 13:31 +0200
ANN: Go Fund Me for ISO Core Standard of Prolog (Re: Is ISO itself not simply a dialect?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-10-09 18:10 +0200
Fuck Around and Find Out : SWI-Prolog Forum [Newline FAFO] (Was: ANN: Go Fund Me for ISO Core Standard of Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-10-10 09:36 +0200
Most Prolog Systems didn't solve it yet [Timer Trash] (Was: Fuck Around and Find Out : SWI-Prolog Forum) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-10-10 09:48 +0200
Moron @jp-diegidio clueless about Unicode (UAX#14) [Re: Most Prolog Systems didn't solve it yet [Timer Trash] (Was: Fuck Around and Find Out : SWI-Prolog Forum) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-10-10 10:22 +0200
ECliPSe Prolog not a SuperProlog (Was: There is something like SuperPrologs ? [SWI, ECLiPSe, etc..]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-06 08:30 +0200
csiph-web