Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory

From	olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory
Date	2025-06-28 10:17 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<103p11e$u0ef$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<103mrs1$ar3e$1@dont-email.me> <80aa46a1ad3397065e575771d1ebe57f6a5c5588.camel@gmail.com> <103p0ad$tj08$2@dont-email.me> <103p0sf$tnu1$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/28/2025 10:14 AM, dbush wrote:
> On 6/28/2025 11:04 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/28/2025 2:43 AM, wij wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2025-06-27 at 14:36 -0500, olcott wrote:
>>>> I am only here for the validation of the behavior
>>>> of DDD correctly simulated by HHH.
>>>
>>> The definition of HHH is missing.
>>
>> The definition is specified in this part that you
>> dishonestly erased:
>>
>> On 6/27/2025 2:36 PM, olcott wrote:
>>  > Termination Analyzer HHH simulates its input until
>>  > it detects a non-terminating behavior pattern. When
>>  > HHH detects such a pattern it aborts its simulation
>>  > and returns 0.
>>
> 
> The dishonest one here is YOU, as it was not wij who snipped the below 
> in his reply but YOU:
> 

I stop at the first counter-factual mistake so I stop here.
Everything else is ignored.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Thread

DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-27 14:36 -0500
  Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-06-28 01:14 +0100
    Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 10:00 -0500
      Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-06-28 17:22 +0100
        Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 11:47 -0500
          Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-06-28 18:38 +0100
            Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 13:08 -0500
            Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 14:16 -0500
    Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-29 10:41 -0500
    Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- (Typo corrected) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-29 10:48 -0500
  Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 15:43 +0800
    Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 10:04 -0500
      Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 11:14 -0400
        Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 10:17 -0500
          Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 11:21 -0400
            Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 10:30 -0500
              Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 11:39 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 10:46 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 11:52 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 11:03 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 13:13 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 12:27 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 13:43 -0400
                Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 13:16 -0500
                Re: DDD correctly simulated by HHH can't possibly reach its own "return" statement --- Liars on comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 12:35 -0500

csiph-web