Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14570
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Re: IntelliJ just created Mellum, its open source (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon) |
| Date | 2025-06-20 21:41 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1034dhp$1374f$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <1034bs9$1364p$1@solani.org> <1034c6f$136cd$1@solani.org> |
Disclaimer: Didn’t double check whether there were already some LLM posts on SWI-Prolog discourse, that would approach a solution. The LSP and the Relay could access the same end-user code repository. Not all data would need a round trip through the client to go from first request to second request. Mild Shock schrieb: > Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon. Unlike > web 1.0 which is static content. Web 2.0 is > all about dynamic content, including building > content incrementally. > > IntelliJ just created Mellum, its open source, > their ghost texts are code snippets. So its > more like recalling typing marcros, giving > them a good guess. Not completing > > partial identifiers: > > Why Did JetBrains Create Mellum? > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TqkvVXKxFA > > LLM optimized for code-related tasks. > https://huggingface.co/JetBrains/Mellum-4b-base > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Web 2.0 is all about incremental content! >> >> > don’t think it could really do >> > the “ghost text” effect. >> >> It wouldn’t do the ghost text, only assist >> it. There was a misunderstanding how “ghost >> texts” work. Maybe you were thinking, that >> the “ghost text” is part of the first response. >> >> But usually the “ghost text” is a second response: >> >> > waiting for completion candidates to be suggested >> >> Well you don’t use it for your primary >> typing completion which is preferably fast. >> The first response might give context information, >> for the second request which provides a >> different type of completion. >> >> But the first response is not responsible >> for any timing towards the second request. >> That anyway happens in the client. And it >> doesn’t hurt if the first response is >> from a stupid channel. >> >> Web 2.0 is all about incremental content! >
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-20 21:13 +0200
IntelliJ just created Mellum, its open source (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-20 21:18 +0200
Re: IntelliJ just created Mellum, its open source (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-20 21:41 +0200
timers and tasks testing framework Node.js v20.0.0] (Was: IntelliJ just created Mellum, its open source) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-23 13:05 +0200
The magical "async" keyword again [Node.js v20.0.0] (Was: timers and tasks testing framework [Node.js v20.0.0]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-23 13:10 +0200
OpenAPI Specification (OAS) goes full Monty [AsyncAPI] (Was: The magical "async" keyword again [Node.js v20.0.0]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-24 08:16 +0200
OpenAPI Specification (OAS) goes full Monty [AsyncAPI] (Was: The magical "async" keyword again [Node.js v20.0.0]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-24 08:17 +0200
constant caching test case / Prolog orthodoxification (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-24 01:06 +0200
Teachers have better quality than Nerds (Was: constant caching test case / Prolog orthodoxification) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-24 01:12 +0200
ISO is loosing it because it gives in to Teachers (Was: Teachers have better quality than Nerds) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-24 01:26 +0200
Where APIs Meet AI: Building Tomorrow's Intelligent Ecosystems (Was: ISO is loosing it because it gives in to Teachers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-24 08:24 +0200
A library(pio) for the Web 2.0 (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-25 15:17 +0200
Corr. (Was: A library(pio) for the Web 2.0) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-25 15:19 +0200
csiph-web