Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14559

Why do IDEs have Power Save mode? (Was: Java and OpenJFX or JavaScript and WHATWG?)

Show all headers | View raw

The restart maybe explains why IntelliJ has a
Power Safe mode, but I am not 100% sure about
the details. But if the end-user behaviour is
not compatible with the chosen delays, he might

tear down the tasks again and again. This could
use compute power. Some incremental tasks or tasks
that block (i.e. the "lag") could be a solution.
Incremental tasks that do only small work and

not big work, are less perceived as blocking
(i.e. the lag). But a ghost text that maybe
involves calling an Artificial Intelligence API
is probably in nature not a small work task,

in the sense that it would occupy a short work
time, the Artificial Intelligence API server
might be busy and cause a task slow down.

Disclaimer: I am doing some brain writing here...

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Somebody wrote:
> 
>  > noticeable lag waiting for completion candidates
> 
> A lag wouldn’t be a problem. I guess the problem
> is that the GUI gets blocked, right? If your GUI
> has tasks and timers, you could try the follow:
> 
> - Debouncing Timer: To start ghost after lets
>    say 1000 ms, the debouncing is to assure that
>    the ghost appears after the last edit and not
>    after the first edit.
> 
> - Abortable Task: The ghost is then computed
>    asynchronously via a task. But this task is
>    again tied to the debouncing, means the task
>    gets aborted if the end-user shows impatience.
> 
> I checked a couple of GUI tools to do that. Had
> rather bad experience with Java and OpenJFX, so I
> am returning back to the JavaScript and WHATWG
> with my ongoing research.
> 
> SVG tags were not working out the box
> https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/OpenJFX/Main
> 
> No runLater(), any task can any time modify the DOM!
> https://whatwg.org/
> 
> But maybe there are other GUI frameworks which
> can do it. If tasks are also used for highlighting
> I belive they can be also run asynchronously without
> explicitly juggling with some queues,
> 
> just await the asynchrous routine that the task
> would execute, in a instrumentation loop, and ignore
> the aborts, since an abort is now good news and not
> bad news, it only indicates that
> 
> the end user did an edit and that the task
> will be restartet.

Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Java and OpenJFX or JavaScript and WHATWG? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-17 10:47 +0200
  Why do IDEs have Power Save mode? (Was: Java and OpenJFX or JavaScript and WHATWG?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-17 10:49 +0200
    Dog Shit: Call my name "jan.ai" (Was: Why do IDEs have Power Save mode?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-17 16:17 +0200
      There is no flesh and blood async Prolog! (Was: Dog Shit: Call my name "jan.ai") Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-19 14:04 +0200
        When did the Dogelog Player Quantum Leap happen? (Was: There is no flesh and blood async Prolog!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-19 14:11 +0200
          Main problem with simulated “threads” (Was: When did the Dogelog Player Quantum Leap happen?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-19 14:26 +0200
            Time Sharing: Martin Richards, Ken Thompson and Linus Torvalds Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-19 14:38 +0200
              <parallel> Ant Task doesn't need threads (Was: Time Sharing: Martin Richards, Ken Thompson and Linus Torvalds) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-19 14:54 +0200
          Corr.: wrong date, should read 2021 (Was: When did the Dogelog Player Quantum Leap happen?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-06-19 17:47 +0200

csiph-web