Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #16891
| From | Daniel Brandes <dbs@brandes.xyz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.thunderbird |
| Subject | Re: GPG integration |
| Date | 2025-06-08 16:24 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10246e6$3smfh$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <1021u62$36ia4$1@dont-email.me> <a51fabca586e4bb16bc63ed8ddeadb6f@dizum.com> |
Am 08.06.25 um 00:35 schrieb D: > don't know, but private-key encryption could be serious enough to learn > more about how popular programs like t-bird could safely use gnupg, etc. > before entrusting its use <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=thunderbird+gnupg> Thanks for the input, but that's not a viable approach for me. The portion of people who depend on such a technology to work in a somewhat user friendly manner, e.g. activists, may even exceed the one of IT hobbyists. *This right here* is the maximum of research people like me can spare; up to you whether you decide to be helpful.
Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GPG integration Daniel Brandes <dbs@brandes.xyz> - 2025-06-07 19:50 +0200
Re: GPG integration D <J@M> - 2025-06-08 00:35 +0200
Re: GPG integration Daniel Brandes <dbs@brandes.xyz> - 2025-06-08 16:24 +0200
Re: GPG integration VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-06-07 23:13 -0500
Re: GPG integration Daniel Brandes <dbs@brandes.xyz> - 2025-06-08 17:52 +0200
Re: GPG integration Bob Henson <bob.henson@outlook.com> - 2025-06-08 10:22 +0100
Re: GPG integration D <J@M> - 2025-06-08 18:26 +0200
Re: GPG integration D <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> - 2025-06-08 23:16 -0400
csiph-web