Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #27504
| Subject | Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| References | <p0h1kt$tb7$1@dont-email.me> <0ee35027-a1c3-4f50-8ad9-12a24ec6b0cd@googlegroups.com> <87o9m8hyo9.fsf@nightsong.com> |
| From | Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> |
| Message-ID | <0cU3C.136255$OX.30544@fx47.am4> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2018-01-05 23:51 +0000 |
On 05/01/18 19:51, Paul Rubin wrote: > StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> writes: >> Neither are the various ad hoc tweaks to the venerable "superloop". To >> find out about the alternatives, I would recommend to google for the >> phrase "beyond the RTOS". > > I looked at https://www.embeddedrelated.com/showarticle/951.php and the > linked slideshare presentation. I'm not that much of an OOP guy so I > may have missed some of the jargon. But it looks like you're advocating > a traditional message-passing approach to concurrency, with some scheme > for wrapping a separate event loop for each task. You might like the > Erlang OTP system which does something like that, with preemptive > scheduling and no shared data between tasks. It may be inadequate for > low latency hard-real-time systems but works very well when there's a > little bit more timing slack available (millisecond-level soft RT). Or, with careful thought and decades of experience, you can implement the RTOS in hardware. See the multicore XMOS xCORE processors with xC (a modern CSP/Occam), for embedded hard realtime programs. "Hard" means the IDE/toolchain calculates the min/max instruction times. Processors with up to 32 cores and 4000MIPS, and interrupt latencies of 10ns. There is tightly integrated hardware plus software support for i/o event processing and inter-core comms. With that you don't need an RTOS :)
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-01-05 09:47 -0800
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-01-05 11:51 -0800
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? StateMachineCOM <statemachineguru@gmail.com> - 2018-01-05 15:30 -0800
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-01-05 16:34 -0800
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-01-05 21:34 -0600
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-01-05 19:52 -0800
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-01-06 16:42 -0600
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-01-08 13:45 -0800
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-01-05 23:51 +0000
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2018-01-05 16:35 -0800
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-01-06 09:45 +0000
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-01-06 12:32 +0200
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-01-06 11:16 +0000
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-01-07 13:35 +0200
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-01-07 13:55 +0000
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2018-01-06 16:49 -0600
Re: When exactly do you choose to use a RTOS (instead of a non-OS approach)? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-01-07 01:39 +0000
csiph-web