Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #275101
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| References | (2 earlier) <msf99f$bmg$4@dont-email.me> <mshmi5$4ul$1@dont-email.me> <ojpouatmgsr2h185it6mq4mlk8af2avoun@4ax.com> <POednYTdyrpA93HInZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <hf8ubc-lh2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! |
| Date | 2015-09-06 13:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <08-dnUIDmZpZHXHInZ2dnUU7-SWdnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:hf8ubc-lh2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: "And even if someone wants to cry out seismic activity they have to look at the preponderance of the evidence because most all of it says CGIs and Nukes." and jimp didn't have a reply Evidence that says CGIs: Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U Evidence of nukes in Nuke York City: Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I And given that the media was caught using inconsistent statements everything they relied on is also suspected of or was caught using inconstancies themselves. <G> Rocky
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:50 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 11:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:35 -0500
Re: Rocky incoherent again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:07 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:09 -0500
Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:21 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:45 -0500
Re: Rocky the stalking lunatic raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 19:26 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 16:21 -0500
Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:38 +0000
Re: Strange Features Found in the Naudet Brothers First Strike Footage (jimp forgets about freeze frame again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K proves she lies about Dimitri) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:27 -0500
Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 15:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 19:33 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! - (K is caught bulshitting again.) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 15:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (test for K the kook) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 01:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - Why is Roger DESPERATE to divert attention from his own claims? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 16:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 16:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K stop your bickering) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K stop your bickering) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K poves she is a complete asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:42 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K poves she is a complete asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:45 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 10:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 19:11 -0400
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 03:39 -0500
Re: Yet more Rocky delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:01 +0000
csiph-web