Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #35068
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... |
| Date | 2016-10-06 20:15 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <061020162015119947%nospam@nospam.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <nt0oj6$uk8$1@dont-email.me> <041020161348119312%nospam@nospam.invalid> <nt0vp4$plu$1@dont-email.me> <041020162215587263%nospam@nospam.invalid> <nt23dp$ijd$1@dont-email.me> |
In article <nt23dp$ijd$1@dont-email.me>, AL <234nomail186@invalid.com> wrote: > > >>> to be replaced with a digital version that offers greater > >>> reliability, > > >>> higher quality audio, > > Nope. It makes no difference whether the analog signal travels a 3 foot > cord or a hair's width micro trace. The audio quality depends on the > equipment used, not the length of the analog wire. nobody said anything about length. you're confused. the major advantage is that headphones are no longer limited to the dac in the device. they can use any dac they want. the better headphones will use higher end dacs while cheaper headphones will use cheap dacs. giving the user a *much* wider choice of options. even audiophiles who think there's an advantage to high bitrate audio can get headphones with appropriate dacs. > >>> noise cancellation > > Wired headphones with noise cancellation abound. And Bluetooth too. > Nothing new there. nope. quite a lot new there. existing noise canceling headphones have their own noise canceling circuitry, making them relatively expensive. with a digital link, noise cancelation can entirely be done using the phone's existing noise cancelation hardware (it already does it for phone calls), which means that noise-canceling headphones can be *less* expensive than they are now. yet another win for consumers. furthermore, the processor in a phone is far more capable than anything you'd find in headphones meaning the noise cancelation could be even more effective than it is now *and* be cheaper. > But IMO charging yet another device is a PITA. who said anything about charging? wired headphones don't need to be charged. you're very confused. > >>> and much, much more. > > And much(1) much(2) more what? more benefits. do try to keep up. among the numerous benefits include biometric sensors. the ear is a perfect place to monitor pulse, body temp and many other things, particularly for those not interested in wearing fitness bands or smartwatches. > > there will always be those who want to hold technology back and > > remain in the past. > > No one holds technology back. Unless you count not buying it. those that complain about keeping a 100+ year old interface are doing exactly that. > > over thirty *years* after the cd debuted, there are still those who > > insist on using vinyl records. > > Yep. My local Barnes & Noble sells new 33 rpm records. Choice is great. they don't sell very many, my local barnes&noble closed and good luck finding a record player. > > it won't be long until most android phones have digital audio jacks. > > You have crystal balls now? The market will decide. it's quite obvious in what direction the market is going. > > people will be > > thrilled about the numerous advantages of a digital audio jack. > > Hope it takes wired headphones that don't need a charge. why would wired headphones need a charge? it wouldn't. you're very confused and don't understand the industry. no surprise there.
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Another advantage of removable batteries ... tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-02 18:36 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-02 18:48 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-02 23:44 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-03 07:26 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-03 14:22 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-03 14:51 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-03 15:32 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-04 02:37 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-10-03 19:08 +0000
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-04 03:06 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-04 10:29 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-04 13:35 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2016-10-05 13:53 +0100
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-05 23:53 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-03 10:12 +0100
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-03 14:26 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... XS11E <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> - 2016-10-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-10-04 03:16 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... AL <234nomail186@invalid.com> - 2016-10-04 10:24 -0700
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-04 13:48 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... AL <234nomail186@invalid.com> - 2016-10-04 12:26 -0700
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-04 22:15 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... AL <234nomail186@invalid.com> - 2016-10-04 22:35 -0700
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-06 20:15 -0400
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2016-11-27 19:52 +0000
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-27 14:53 -0500
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2016-11-29 16:44 +0000
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-29 12:23 -0500
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 18:50 +0000
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... AL <234nomail186@invalid.com> - 2016-10-04 16:50 -0700
Re: Another advantage of removable batteries ... Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-10-04 19:11 +0100
csiph-web