Re: Religious arguments

From	nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.mobile.android
Subject	Re: Religious arguments
Date	2016-08-03 15:19 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<030820161519405363%nospam@nospam.invalid> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <9dj0qbhoeh2vhbgc1mm16u23spunn05iq3@4ax.com> <nnpjku$lfq$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA65890D6E806Dnilch1@wheedledeedle.moc> <020820161446392697%nospam@nospam.invalid> <XnsA659980DC6632nilch1@wheedledeedle.moc>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <XnsA659980DC6632nilch1@wheedledeedle.moc>, Nil
<rednoise9@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:

> >> My filter must be effective because I have no idea who you're
> >> talking about.
> > 
> > currently 'aardvarks'.
> 
> After checking it out, I see the reason I don't see those trolling 
> threads is because I have crossposts filtered out. In my experience, 
> there is rarely if ever anything good come out of such crossposts, 
> especially if they come from a group about a "rival" OS 
> (misc.phone.mobile.iphone) or completely unrelated subject 
> (sci.electronics.repair). Those who crosspost like that are only trying  
> to stir up controversy, not have a real discussion.


sometimes cross-posting is valid, but in this case, he does it to troll.

Thread

Religious arguments The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 20:05 -0700
  Re: Religious arguments tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-02 01:14 -0400
  Re: Religious arguments Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2016-08-02 09:40 +0200
    Re: Religious arguments Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 07:55 +0000
      Re: Religious arguments Nil <rednoise9@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> - 2016-08-02 14:14 -0400
        Re: Religious arguments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-02 14:46 -0400
          Re: Religious arguments Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-08-02 20:01 +0000
          Re: Religious arguments Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2016-08-03 04:34 +0200
            Re: Religious arguments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-02 22:47 -0400
              Re: Religious arguments Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2016-08-03 19:29 +0200
                Re: Religious arguments The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 10:33 -0700
                Re: Religious arguments Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2016-08-04 04:09 +0200
          Re: Religious arguments Nil <rednoise9@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> - 2016-08-03 14:56 -0400
            Re: Religious arguments nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 15:19 -0400
              Re: Religious arguments Nil <rednoise9@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> - 2016-08-03 16:08 -0400
  Re: Religious arguments "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2016-08-02 20:13 +0200
  Re: Religious arguments crankypuss <undisclosedUserid@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 08:38 -0600

csiph-web