Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376590

Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity

Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Date	2016-02-19 19:28 -0800
References	(1 earlier) <a50c8b63-7871-4f39-941d-f09d7c7553e7@googlegroups.com> <56C774D2.4AFE@ix.netcom.com> <da842ffe-b7c2-488f-8181-e61ec6f374c2@googlegroups.com> <eea922c0-5f9b-4fba-abe9-be405f994416@googlegroups.com> <dee7a641-83e8-4452-9020-221ca6851aac@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<01dbfe97-c2e2-41c0-8471-eadaeda24f82@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity
From	John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 9:15:13 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote:
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 9:04:31 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote:
> > On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 8:59:18 PM UTC-6, John Gogo wrote:
> > > On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 2:02:27 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Spocks...@gmail.com
> > > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > really, i didn't know that.
> > > 
> > > The ultimate gravity equation will be expressed by the law of addition.
> > 
> > To me, when two different weighted balls fall off the Tower of Pisa means nothing to me- other than the fact that we allow ourselves to be swayed by two objects which are essentially identical when it come to universal measure. We become trapped into the multi-dimension of our muse.
> 
> I fundamentally believe that different sized objects do not fall at the same rate.

Earth-wise, larger objects fall slower than smaller objects.

Thread

Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:02 -0800
  Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 18:59 -0800
    Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:04 -0800
      Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:09 -0800
      Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:15 -0800
        Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:28 -0800
          Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:33 -0800
    Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:12 -0800
      Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:37 -0800
  Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
    Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:11 -0800
      Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 18:43 -0800
        Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 18:57 -0800
          Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 19:00 -0800
            Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 19:13 -0800
              Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 18:28 -0800
        Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity Stzepan Zdrobněliny <stzepan282@guadalajara.org> - 2016-02-21 15:44 +0000

csiph-web