Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > us.talk.constitution > #136 > unrolled thread

Law is dead in Washington state: I-1639 is inarguably illegal

Back to article view | Back to us.talk.constitution

Contents

  Law is dead in Washington state: I-1639 is inarguably illegal "Gene Poole" <gp@dont-email.me> - 2018-09-15 03:25 +0200

#136 — Law is dead in Washington state: I-1639 is inarguably illegal

There is no law in Washington state. On Friday, the Seattle 
Supreme Court — formerly the Washington State Supreme Court 
–killed it. The so-called justices killed the law because they 
are left-wing activist, arrogant, lying hacks. They hate guns, 
they hate gun owners, solely due to those factors they 
unanimously approved Initiative I-1639.  The so-called court 
openly defied the clear and simple language of Washington state 
law. The so-called judges killed the law.

This is a serious matter. If King County voters press I-1639 
upon Washington state, gun owners will have a moral obligation 
to refuse to comply. We will not be breaking the law because, in 
Washington state, there is no law.

Proof that it is literally impossible to contend I-1639 is legal
The law says initiatives in our state must contain the clear, 
complete language of the proposed legislation. Here, in plain 
language, is the Secretary of State’s website explaining that 
requirement.

State law requires that petitions contain certain information, 
including the full text of the measure. This includes a ballot 
title and summary, written by either the Attorney General or a 
Superior Court judge, and other required information. The full 
text is usually printed on the back of the petition. Sometimes 
petition circulators attach the petitions to clip boards in 
order to make them easier to sign or easier for the circulator 
to handle. Sometimes the full petition or the full text of the 
proposal might be folded over or on the back. You should feel 
free to read any part of the petition that you think is 
necessary in order for you to make up your mind, even if that 
means unfolding it or removing it from a clip board.

The billionaires behind I-1639 — at least two of whom apparently 
enjoy armed guards for themselves — didn’t bother to put the 
full text of the measure on the initiatives people signed: it-is-
not-there. That is not even questionable. There is the proposed 
law and there is what people signed: the two documents are-not-
the-same. Here, used with the permission of WeTheGoverned.com, 
is the initiative people signed. The red ink indicates where the 
language has been altered, ignored or changed. This is-not-the-
full-text of the measure.

government
Image created by ‘We the Governed.com.’

The so-called justices need to know this: You can kill the law 
but, in so doing, you kill the moral requirement to follow your 
diktat
This is not a judicial ruling, it is a diktat. In openly defies 
the law. The Seattle Supreme Court has not only killed the law, 
they have handed the citizens of Washington state a moral 
obligation to ignore this diktat. The so-called justices may 
have power, but they have killed their standing as arbiters of 
the law. If I-1639 passes, most gun owners will defy it. We will 
say to the Seattle Supreme Court and the rest of the one-party 
apparatus of the state: “we are not breaking the law because 
there is no law–you killed it.”

http://mynorthwest.com/1091009/law-is-dead-in-washington-state-i-
1639-is-inarguably-illegal/
  

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | us.talk.constitution

csiph-web