Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.tech.broadcast > #70556 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-09-26 19:08 +0100 |
| Last post | 2026-09-27 13:12 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 373 — 34 participants |
Back to article view | Back to uk.tech.broadcast
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 19:08 +0100
Re: OT - TV Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> - 2026-09-26 19:58 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 20:30 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-27 09:39 +0100
Re: OT - TV JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-09-28 08:08 +0100
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-26 19:10 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 21:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-26 21:03 +0100
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-27 18:20 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 16:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-28 15:45 +0000
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-28 16:30 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 17:46 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 22:25 +0100
Re: OT - TV NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-09-29 16:40 +0100
OT - Lehrer (was: Re: OT - TV) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-29 16:58 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer (was: Re: OT - TV) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 18:19 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-29 20:57 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Charles Hope <clh@candehope.me.uk> - 2026-09-29 20:00 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer (was: Re: OT - TV) André Coutanche <acoutanche@gmx.co.uk> - 2026-09-29 21:50 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-09-29 22:33 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 22:48 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-30 01:07 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-30 15:51 -0700
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-10-01 10:57 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-09-30 08:10 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-30 01:39 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-30 00:46 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-09-29 22:39 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-09-30 12:25 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-30 13:34 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 14:31 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-09-30 14:47 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-09-30 14:58 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 02:36 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-10-01 11:12 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:35 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-10-01 16:14 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-10-01 17:35 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-01 17:53 +0000
Re: OT - Lehrer John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 21:50 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:25 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer marika <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2026-10-09 00:03 +0000
Song of the Track/Ceol na Loidhne JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-10-09 15:27 +0100
Re: Song of the Track/Ceol na Loidhne Chris J Dixon <chris@cdixon.me.uk> - 2026-10-10 09:23 +0100
Re: Song of the Track/Ceol na Loidhne John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-10 10:37 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:13 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-10-01 11:51 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-09-30 14:55 +0100
Re: OT - Lehrer Charles Hope <clh@candehope.me.uk> - 2026-09-30 14:15 +0000
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-27 19:58 +1000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-09-27 22:13 +1000
Re: OT - TV Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> - 2026-10-08 21:51 +0200
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 18:47 +1100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-12 11:47 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-12 11:58 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 22:37 +1100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-12 13:17 +0100
[OT] - audio distribution, Rediffusion-style (was: Re: OT - TV) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-28 16:43 +0100
Re: [OT] - audio distribution, Rediffusion-style Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> - 2026-10-08 22:22 +0200
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-09-27 11:44 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-27 16:12 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-09-27 18:12 +0100
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-27 18:23 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 18:34 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-09-28 14:03 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-28 15:56 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-28 16:46 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-28 17:16 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-09-29 12:01 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 13:05 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-29 13:25 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-29 14:13 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Other John <nomail@here.org> - 2026-09-29 16:53 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 17:12 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-30 10:22 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-09-30 13:36 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:23 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:48 +0100
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-09-30 07:37 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 14:28 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 00:35 +0200
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 02:15 +0100
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-01 00:15 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:24 +0200
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-10-01 17:17 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:48 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-01 13:10 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-01 13:42 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-01 13:32 +0100
Re: OT - TV Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:52 +0000
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-03 21:10 +1000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-03 13:39 +0200
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-04 21:26 +1100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:19 +0200
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-04 10:36 -0400
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:18 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 12:47 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-03 12:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 13:09 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-03 15:59 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-03 15:56 +0000
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-03 17:19 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-04 10:54 +0000
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 01:27 -0400
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-05 07:55 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-05 14:54 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-05 15:17 +0000
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-05 11:29 +0100
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-05 11:46 +0100
Re: OT - TV JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-10-06 17:51 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-06 18:58 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-06 20:36 +0200
Re: OT - TV JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-10-07 09:00 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:04 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 12:21 +0200
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-07 11:54 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 12:37 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-08 13:51 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 13:04 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-08 22:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:15 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-09 22:22 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-09 22:33 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-10 19:20 +0200
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-09 22:20 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-09 22:32 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-09 23:08 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-10 19:34 +0200
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-11 21:15 +1100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-11 11:23 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-11 22:15 +1100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-11 14:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-11 15:54 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-11 18:35 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-11 18:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-11 20:10 +0100
Re: OT - TV NY <me@privacy.net> - 2026-10-11 20:54 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 18:11 +1100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-12 02:24 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-12 07:23 +0100
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-12 03:13 -0400
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 21:07 +1100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-12 18:21 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-13 22:36 +1100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 18:17 +1100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-12 10:55 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 18:09 +1100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 17:58 +1100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-11 15:18 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-11 14:59 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-11 21:29 +0200
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-11 22:17 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-11 23:46 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-12 10:48 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-12 18:28 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-12 19:11 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-12 22:35 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-13 01:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-13 06:16 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-13 08:27 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-13 18:40 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-13 20:54 +0200
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-13 19:57 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-13 21:10 +0200
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 00:06 +1100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-13 20:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-13 20:21 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-13 22:09 +0200
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-13 22:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 00:09 +1100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-14 14:31 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-13 08:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-13 17:21 +0000
Re: OT - TV JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-10-13 12:08 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-13 13:16 +0200
Re: OT - TV JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-10-13 12:23 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-13 18:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-13 18:16 +0000
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-13 19:47 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-13 20:00 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-13 20:28 +0100
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-13 22:51 -0400
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-14 00:32 -0400
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-14 01:26 -0400
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-14 14:08 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 18:58 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-14 09:07 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 18:43 +0000
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-14 08:29 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 18:04 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-14 16:21 +0200
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 18:48 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 04:56 +0000
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-14 09:09 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 04:48 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 04:32 +0000
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-13 16:28 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-13 19:36 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-13 20:08 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 05:07 +0000
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-14 09:09 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-13 20:59 +0200
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-13 20:16 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-13 22:16 +0200
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-13 23:15 +0100
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-13 23:52 +0000
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-13 20:39 -0400
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-14 03:21 +0000
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-14 01:18 -0400
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-14 12:42 +0200
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-14 08:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-14 09:16 +0100
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-14 04:42 -0400
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-14 14:18 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-14 14:45 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-14 16:25 +0200
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-14 12:34 +0200
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-14 12:31 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-14 13:21 +0100
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-14 13:31 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-14 14:48 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 18:54 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 18:50 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 05:14 +0000
Re: OT - TV JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-10-14 16:09 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-10-14 11:34 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 19:16 +0000
Re: OT - TV Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2026-10-14 16:00 -0500
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 00:19 +1100
Re: OT - TV Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> - 2026-10-13 17:06 +0000
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 00:01 +1100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-14 17:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 17:45 +0000
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-14 17:44 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-12 13:25 +0200
Re: OT - TV wolfgang s <see@sig.nature> - 2026-10-13 11:21 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-13 14:38 +0100
Re: OT - TV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-13 16:55 +0000
Re: OT - TV JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-10-14 16:05 +0100
Re: OT - TV wolfgang s <see@sig.nature> - 2026-10-14 09:57 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-14 13:16 +0100
Re: OT - TV wolfgang s <see@sig.nature> - 2026-10-14 21:56 +0000
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-15 12:51 +0100
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-14 23:14 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-15 10:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-15 12:54 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-15 15:32 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-15 14:57 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-15 16:45 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-15 19:22 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-10-15 17:24 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-15 19:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-10-16 14:04 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-16 18:31 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-10-17 11:53 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-18 17:51 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-10-18 17:53 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-10-18 17:55 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-18 18:18 +0100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-10-19 13:54 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-19 15:36 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-17 13:16 +0200
Re: OT - TV richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2026-10-16 13:15 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-16 15:44 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-17 23:09 +1100
Re: OT - TV Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2026-10-18 10:45 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-12 10:45 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 21:14 +1100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-12 12:03 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-12 12:07 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-12 13:27 +0200
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 22:46 +1100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-12 13:57 +0200
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 21:11 +1100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-12 13:26 +0200
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-10 03:38 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-10 19:35 +0200
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-10 12:44 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-10 13:29 +0100
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-11 00:01 -0400
Re: OT - TV Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-11 05:23 +0000
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 21:21 +1100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-11 09:56 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 21:18 +1100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-11 09:30 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-11 10:12 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-11 10:34 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-11 18:05 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 21:24 +1100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-10 19:30 +0200
Re: OT - TV JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-10-12 19:26 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-12 19:40 +0100
Re: OT - TV JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-10-13 12:03 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-13 14:31 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-13 18:20 +0100
Re: OT - TV chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-10-16 16:14 -0500
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-17 01:01 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-12 19:45 +0100
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-12 19:54 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-13 08:19 +0100
Re: OT - TV chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-10-16 16:13 -0500
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-17 13:22 +0200
Re: OT - TV JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-10-13 12:05 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-13 14:34 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-12 21:56 +0200
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-08 15:44 +0100
[OT] hybrids (was: Re: OT - TV) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-08 22:12 +0100
Re: [OT] hybrids liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-08 22:42 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 12:00 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 12:06 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 12:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk> - 2026-10-07 15:29 +0100
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-08 15:49 +0100
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-08 13:12 -0400
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-08 22:17 +0100
Re: OT - TV Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk> - 2026-10-09 08:12 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-10 04:21 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-10 08:25 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-08 13:54 +0200
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-06 14:40 -0400
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 08:02 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 12:47 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-06 00:23 +0100
Re: OT - TV Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-12 21:59 +1100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-12 18:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 18:41 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-03 22:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-03 21:24 -0400
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-04 08:08 +0000
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-04 09:29 +0100
Re: OT - TV Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> - 2026-09-30 15:13 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-29 13:16 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-29 15:54 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-29 17:15 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:27 +0200
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-09-30 11:13 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-09-30 11:19 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:57 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-30 13:29 +0100
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-09-30 13:54 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 14:34 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-30 18:08 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-01 02:22 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-01 06:37 +0000
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-01 10:32 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-01 09:41 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 00:37 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 11:50 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-30 13:08 +0000
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 00:50 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-01 06:12 +0000
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 03:29 -0400
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:53 +0200
Re: OT - TV Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-10-01 03:32 -0400
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:49 +0200
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 12:57 +0100
Re: OT - TV liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-10-01 13:27 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-01 15:19 +0200
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-01 14:34 +0000
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 15:51 +0100
Re: OT - TV Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-10-02 06:52 +0000
Re: OT - TV Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-04 07:52 +0100
Re: OT - TV c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 03:15 -0400
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-04 15:51 +0100
Re: OT - TV The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:16 +0100
Re: OT - TV Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> - 2026-10-16 18:22 +0000
Re: OT - TV John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> - 2026-10-16 20:32 +0100
Re: OT - TV "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-10-17 01:55 +0100
Re: OT - TV "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-27 13:12 +0200
Page 14 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 19 Next page →
| From | Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-18 17:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11b2tht$1aen6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71007 |
On 18/10/2026 17:51, Liz Tuddenham wrote: > Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >> On 16/10/2026 18:31, J. P. Gilliver wrote: >>> On 2026/10/16 14:4:47, Max Demian wrote: >>> [] >>>> Nothing Nazi. I read the expression in a dictionary by someone called >>>> Wilde, collected by my parents in fortnightly instalments in the 1930s. >>>> Common at the time: you returned them to the publisher who bound them >>>> and sent them back to you: they just looked like a regular bound book. >>>> >>> >>> You mean they posted the parts to you fortnightly, you then posted them >>> back, and they then posted them back to you agaun? >> >> That's right. Properly bound; better than 'binders' that the parts would >> fall out of. The same with magazines. We used to have two bound volumes >> of a magazine called Amateur Mechanic (a DIY magazine before the term >> was invented I think), which was published around (or just after) WW1. >> It covered everything from stuffing animals (including big ones like >> cows) to radio (crystal sets). > > There were two volumes of 'Practical Mechanic' on sale at a recent Bring > & Buy sale of the Wessex Stationary Engine Club. As far as I know > nobody bought them so I could trace the seller if you are sufficiently > interested. Probably the ones that we had. Of historical/novelty interest. -- Max Demian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-18 17:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11b2tm7$1aen6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71008 |
On 18/10/2026 17:53, Max Demian wrote: > On 18/10/2026 17:51, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >> Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >> >>> On 16/10/2026 18:31, J. P. Gilliver wrote: >>>> On 2026/10/16 14:4:47, Max Demian wrote: >>>> [] >>>>> Nothing Nazi. I read the expression in a dictionary by someone called >>>>> Wilde, collected by my parents in fortnightly instalments in the >>>>> 1930s. >>>>> Common at the time: you returned them to the publisher who bound them >>>>> and sent them back to you: they just looked like a regular bound book. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You mean they posted the parts to you fortnightly, you then posted them >>>> back, and they then posted them back to you agaun? >>> >>> That's right. Properly bound; better than 'binders' that the parts would >>> fall out of. The same with magazines. We used to have two bound volumes >>> of a magazine called Amateur Mechanic (a DIY magazine before the term >>> was invented I think), which was published around (or just after) WW1. >>> It covered everything from stuffing animals (including big ones like >>> cows) to radio (crystal sets). >> >> There were two volumes of 'Practical Mechanic' on sale at a recent Bring >> & Buy sale of the Wessex Stationary Engine Club. As far as I know >> nobody bought them so I could trace the seller if you are sufficiently >> interested. > > Probably the ones that we had. Of historical/novelty interest. Is that a typo (by you or me) or is that a different publication? -- Max Demian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-18 18:18 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1s36t9o.1kqif2x1pwzqzoN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #71009 |
Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > On 18/10/2026 17:53, Max Demian wrote: > > On 18/10/2026 17:51, Liz Tuddenham wrote: > >> Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On 16/10/2026 18:31, J. P. Gilliver wrote: > >>>> On 2026/10/16 14:4:47, Max Demian wrote: > >>>> [] > >>>>> Nothing Nazi. I read the expression in a dictionary by someone called > >>>>> Wilde, collected by my parents in fortnightly instalments in the > >>>>> 1930s. > >>>>> Common at the time: you returned them to the publisher who bound them > >>>>> and sent them back to you: they just looked like a regular bound book. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> You mean they posted the parts to you fortnightly, you then posted them > >>>> back, and they then posted them back to you agaun? > >>> > >>> That's right. Properly bound; better than 'binders' that the parts would > >>> fall out of. The same with magazines. We used to have two bound volumes > >>> of a magazine called Amateur Mechanic (a DIY magazine before the term > >>> was invented I think), which was published around (or just after) WW1. > >>> It covered everything from stuffing animals (including big ones like > >>> cows) to radio (crystal sets). > >> > >> There were two volumes of 'Practical Mechanic' on sale at a recent Bring > >> & Buy sale of the Wessex Stationary Engine Club. As far as I know > >> nobody bought them so I could trace the seller if you are sufficiently > >> interested. > > > > Probably the ones that we had. Of historical/novelty interest. > > Is that a typo (by you or me) or is that a different publication? Perhas it was a different publication or I remembered the name wrongly. I flicked through the pages and it contained the sort of articles you have described. It would be a strange coincidence if they were your old volumes; the seller came from the Trowbridge (Wilts) area. -- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-19 13:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11b53to$22i2k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71011 |
On 18/10/2026 18:18, Liz Tuddenham wrote: > Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >> On 18/10/2026 17:53, Max Demian wrote: >>> On 18/10/2026 17:51, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >>>> Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 16/10/2026 18:31, J. P. Gilliver wrote: >>>>>> On 2026/10/16 14:4:47, Max Demian wrote: >>>>>> [] >>>>>>> Nothing Nazi. I read the expression in a dictionary by someone called >>>>>>> Wilde, collected by my parents in fortnightly instalments in the >>>>>>> 1930s. >>>>>>> Common at the time: you returned them to the publisher who bound them >>>>>>> and sent them back to you: they just looked like a regular bound book. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean they posted the parts to you fortnightly, you then posted them >>>>>> back, and they then posted them back to you agaun? >>>>> >>>>> That's right. Properly bound; better than 'binders' that the parts would >>>>> fall out of. The same with magazines. We used to have two bound volumes >>>>> of a magazine called Amateur Mechanic (a DIY magazine before the term >>>>> was invented I think), which was published around (or just after) WW1. >>>>> It covered everything from stuffing animals (including big ones like >>>>> cows) to radio (crystal sets). >>>> >>>> There were two volumes of 'Practical Mechanic' on sale at a recent Bring >>>> & Buy sale of the Wessex Stationary Engine Club. As far as I know >>>> nobody bought them so I could trace the seller if you are sufficiently >>>> interested. >>> >>> Probably the ones that we had. Of historical/novelty interest. >> >> Is that a typo (by you or me) or is that a different publication? > > Perhas it was a different publication or I remembered the name wrongly. > I flicked through the pages and it contained the sort of articles you > have described. > > It would be a strange coincidence if they were your old volumes; the > seller came from the Trowbridge (Wilts) area. Not so far from Chippenham, where we used to live. -- Max Demian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-19 15:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1s38gel.1ny6zr3r0kkhsN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #71017 |
Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > On 18/10/2026 18:18, Liz Tuddenham wrote: > > Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > > > >> On 18/10/2026 17:53, Max Demian wrote: > >>> On 18/10/2026 17:51, Liz Tuddenham wrote: > >>>> Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 16/10/2026 18:31, J. P. Gilliver wrote: > >>>>>> On 2026/10/16 14:4:47, Max Demian wrote: > >>>>>> [] > >>>>>>> Nothing Nazi. I read the expression in a dictionary by someone called > >>>>>>> Wilde, collected by my parents in fortnightly instalments in the > >>>>>>> 1930s. > >>>>>>> Common at the time: you returned them to the publisher who bound them > >>>>>>> and sent them back to you: they just looked like a regular bound book. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You mean they posted the parts to you fortnightly, you then posted them > >>>>>> back, and they then posted them back to you agaun? > >>>>> > >>>>> That's right. Properly bound; better than 'binders' that the parts would > >>>>> fall out of. The same with magazines. We used to have two bound volumes > >>>>> of a magazine called Amateur Mechanic (a DIY magazine before the term > >>>>> was invented I think), which was published around (or just after) WW1. > >>>>> It covered everything from stuffing animals (including big ones like > >>>>> cows) to radio (crystal sets). > >>>> > >>>> There were two volumes of 'Practical Mechanic' on sale at a recent Bring > >>>> & Buy sale of the Wessex Stationary Engine Club. As far as I know > >>>> nobody bought them so I could trace the seller if you are sufficiently > >>>> interested. > >>> > >>> Probably the ones that we had. Of historical/novelty interest. > >> > >> Is that a typo (by you or me) or is that a different publication? > > > > Perhas it was a different publication or I remembered the name wrongly. > > I flicked through the pages and it contained the sort of articles you > > have described. > > > > It would be a strange coincidence if they were your old volumes; the > > seller came from the Trowbridge (Wilts) area. > > Not so far from Chippenham, where we used to live. Next time I see the owner, I'll ask where he got them from. -- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-17 13:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <i02cqmxpqo.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #70989 |
On 2026-10-16 19:31, J. P. Gilliver wrote: > On 2026/10/16 14:4:47, Max Demian wrote: > [] >> Nothing Nazi. I read the expression in a dictionary by someone called >> Wilde, collected by my parents in fortnightly instalments in the 1930s. >> Common at the time: you returned them to the publisher who bound them >> and sent them back to you: they just looked like a regular bound book. >> > > You mean they posted the parts to you fortnightly, you then posted them > back, and they then posted them back to you agaun? Here, local artisans would do the job. We just had to buy the book covers from the publisher separately, often sold at the same street kiosk or library that had sold us the fascicles. An old uncle of mine did the job himself. He bonded them with leather and gold engravings. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-16 13:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <11at819$19tbn$1@artemis.inf.ed.ac.uk> |
| In reply to | #70973 |
In article <11aqunk$2ibri$1@dont-email.me>, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >> They were biggie cultures, so they had widespread >> influence. There are also mutant terms from Iran >> and even India mixed-in early on. It's why they >> call the whole mess the "Indo-European" language >> family. >Formerly known as the "Aryan Mother Tongue". The words "Iran" and "Aryan" have the same origin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_of_Iran#Etymology_of_Iran -- Richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-16 15:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11atd8d$3bqcl$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #70987 |
On 16/10/2026 14:15, Richard Tobin wrote: > In article <11aqunk$2ibri$1@dont-email.me>, > Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >>> They were biggie cultures, so they had widespread >>> influence. There are also mutant terms from Iran >>> and even India mixed-in early on. It's why they >>> call the whole mess the "Indo-European" language >>> family. > >> Formerly known as the "Aryan Mother Tongue". > > The words "Iran" and "Aryan" have the same origin. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_of_Iran#Etymology_of_Iran > Yes. But 'Aryan' developed a special meaning mid 20th century. being used to refer to a mythical prototypical white European race of inherently superior qualities Or, as we later thought of it, Germans being the usual arrogant arseholes... > -- Richard -- Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich people by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason they are poor. Peter Thompson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-17 23:09 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <11avoh9$5gtv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #70966 |
On 15/10/2026 2:14 pm, c186282 wrote: > On 10/14/26 05:57, wolfgang s wrote: >> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> >> wrote in news:11alc8j$iamu$9@dont-email.me: >> >>>> German for "centre" is "Zentrum" though. It was borrowed directly from >>>> Latin, not through French. >>>> >>> I would hope not. I am surprised it was from Latin though, as Germanic >>> languages are a branch of their won separate from Romance ones. >> >> All European languages borrowed heavily from Greek, Latin and French, >> regardless how closely related. > > They were biggie cultures, so they had widespread > influence. There are also mutant terms from Iran > and even India mixed-in early on. It's why they > call the whole mess the "Indo-European" language > family. When people spoke of "Indo-European", I thought the 'Indo' was from a little further east than India, .... like "Indonesia". > > Heard once, but not SURE, that the Basque language > seems unique, independent. -- Daniel70
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-18 10:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11b24ga$10vgu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71000 |
On 17/10/2026 13:09, Daniel70 wrote: > On 15/10/2026 2:14 pm, c186282 wrote: >> On 10/14/26 05:57, wolfgang s wrote: >>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> >>> wrote in news:11alc8j$iamu$9@dont-email.me: >>> >>>>> German for "centre" is "Zentrum" though. It was borrowed directly from >>>>> Latin, not through French. >>>>> >>>> I would hope not. I am surprised it was from Latin though, as Germanic >>>> languages are a branch of their won separate from Romance ones. >>> >>> All European languages borrowed heavily from Greek, Latin and French, >>> regardless how closely related. >> >> They were biggie cultures, so they had widespread >> influence. There are also mutant terms from Iran >> and even India mixed-in early on. It's why they >> call the whole mess the "Indo-European" language >> family. > > When people spoke of "Indo-European", I thought the 'Indo' was from a > little further east than India, .... like "Indonesia". Indonesia is rather a made up name, derived from "India": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesia -- Max Demian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-12 10:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11aia8a$3ehmq$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #70827 |
On 11/10/2026 20:29, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2026-10-11 15:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 11/10/2026 14:18, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 2026-10-11 12:15, Daniel70 wrote: >>>> On 11/10/2026 4:34 am, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>> On 2026-10-10 01:08, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>>>>> On 2026-10-09, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On 09/10/2026 21:20, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2026-10-08 14:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Only if you need to use the brakes a lot >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In hilly country you first use the motor as a brake, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In an automatic car, you do not >>>>>> >>>>>> You can if you want. I often downshift an automatic >>>>>> on a downhill grade. >>>>> >>>>> The only automatic car I have driven was recently a Fiat 600e that >>>>> I rented. Electric. The regenerative brake is brutal. >>>>> >>>>> You can set the cruise controller to 90km/h on a 2000 thousand >>>>> meter high sierra, and it will keep the speed both going up or >>>>> down. I tested it. >>>>> >>>> Are you sure, Carlos?? >>>> >>>> DuckDuckGo suggests Mount Everest (highest point on Earth) is only >>>> 8,849 mtrs high .... somewhat less than your "2000 thousand meter >>>> high sierra". ;-P >>>> >>>> Or are you meaning "2000 thousand meter on the high sierra"?? >>>> >>> >>> Oops. Typo. >>> >>> Two thousand meters. Or 2000 meters. >>> >>> >> That;s a lot of red and black wires... :-) > > I'm not talking of the device to measure volts, but of the distance > measure called "meter" or "metre". I'm unsure which, but the dictionary > insists it is "meter" in American English. > > You are not American -- "Corbyn talks about equality, justice, opportunity, health care, peace, community, compassion, investment, security, housing...." "What kind of person is not interested in those things?" "Jeremy Corbyn?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-12 21:14 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <11aibuk$3fiql$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #70839 |
On 12/10/2026 8:45 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 11/10/2026 20:29, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2026-10-11 15:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 11/10/2026 14:18, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> On 2026-10-11 12:15, Daniel70 wrote: >>>>> On 11/10/2026 4:34 am, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>>> On 2026-10-10 01:08, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>>>>>> On 2026-10-09, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 09/10/2026 21:20, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2026-10-08 14:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Only if you need to use the brakes a lot >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In hilly country you first use the motor as a brake, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In an automatic car, you do not >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can if you want. I often downshift an automatic >>>>>>> on a downhill grade. >>>>>> >>>>>> The only automatic car I have driven was recently a Fiat 600e that >>>>>> I rented. Electric. The regenerative brake is brutal. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can set the cruise controller to 90km/h on a 2000 thousand >>>>>> meter high sierra, and it will keep the speed both going up or >>>>>> down. I tested it. >>>>>> >>>>> Are you sure, Carlos?? >>>>> >>>>> DuckDuckGo suggests Mount Everest (highest point on Earth) is only >>>>> 8,849 mtrs high .... somewhat less than your "2000 thousand meter >>>>> high sierra". ;-P >>>>> >>>>> Or are you meaning "2000 thousand meter on the high sierra"?? >>>>> >>>> Oops. Typo. >>>> >>>> Two thousand meters. Or 2000 meters. >>>> >>> That;s a lot of red and black wires... :-) >> >> I'm not talking of the device to measure volts, but of the distance >> measure called "meter" or "metre". I'm unsure which, but the >> dictionary insists it is "meter" in American English. >> > You are not American > .... and Carlos is discussing a French (sort of 'European') unit of measure. ;-P -- Daniel70
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-12 12:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11aiepc$3g9pi$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #70844 |
On 12/10/2026 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
> On 12/10/2026 8:45 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 11/10/2026 20:29, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>> On 2026-10-11 15:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> On 11/10/2026 14:18, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>>>> On 2026-10-11 12:15, Daniel70 wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/10/2026 4:34 am, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2026-10-10 01:08, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2026-10-09, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2026 21:20, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-10-08 14:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Only if you need to use the brakes a lot
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In hilly country you first use the motor as a brake,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In an automatic car, you do not
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can if you want. I often downshift an automatic
>>>>>>>> on a downhill grade.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The only automatic car I have driven was recently a Fiat 600e
>>>>>>> that I rented. Electric. The regenerative brake is brutal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can set the cruise controller to 90km/h on a 2000 thousand
>>>>>>> meter high sierra, and it will keep the speed both going up or
>>>>>>> down. I tested it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you sure, Carlos??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DuckDuckGo suggests Mount Everest (highest point on Earth) is only
>>>>>> 8,849 mtrs high .... somewhat less than your "2000 thousand meter
>>>>>> high sierra". ;-P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or are you meaning "2000 thousand meter on the high sierra"??
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oops. Typo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Two thousand meters. Or 2000 meters.
>>>>>
>>>> That;s a lot of red and black wires... :-)
>>>
>>> I'm not talking of the device to measure volts, but of the distance
>>> measure called "meter" or "metre". I'm unsure which, but the
>>> dictionary insists it is "meter" in American English.
>>>
>> You are not American
>>
> .... and Carlos is discussing a French (sort of 'European') unit of
> measure. ;-P
Yes.
The French word for "meter" (the unit of length) is spelled mètre.
Its the same in English.
Kilometre - not Kilometer
--
“I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the
greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most
obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of
conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which
they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by
thread, into the fabric of their lives.”
― Leo Tolstoy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-12 12:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1s2v89c.1gvk7w617g747cN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #70844 |
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: [...] > .... and Carlos is discussing a French (sort of 'European') unit of > measure. ;-P "Measure" is a verb, the noun is "Measurement". -- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-12 13:27 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mqsupmxgth.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #70844 |
On 2026-10-12 12:14, Daniel70 wrote: > On 12/10/2026 8:45 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 11/10/2026 20:29, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 2026-10-11 15:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> On 11/10/2026 14:18, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>> On 2026-10-11 12:15, Daniel70 wrote: >>>>>> On 11/10/2026 4:34 am, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>>>> On 2026-10-10 01:08, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2026-10-09, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2026 21:20, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-10-08 14:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Only if you need to use the brakes a lot >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In hilly country you first use the motor as a brake, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In an automatic car, you do not >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can if you want. I often downshift an automatic >>>>>>>> on a downhill grade. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only automatic car I have driven was recently a Fiat 600e >>>>>>> that I rented. Electric. The regenerative brake is brutal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can set the cruise controller to 90km/h on a 2000 thousand >>>>>>> meter high sierra, and it will keep the speed both going up or >>>>>>> down. I tested it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Are you sure, Carlos?? >>>>>> >>>>>> DuckDuckGo suggests Mount Everest (highest point on Earth) is only >>>>>> 8,849 mtrs high .... somewhat less than your "2000 thousand meter >>>>>> high sierra". ;-P >>>>>> >>>>>> Or are you meaning "2000 thousand meter on the high sierra"?? >>>>>> >>>>> Oops. Typo. >>>>> >>>>> Two thousand meters. Or 2000 meters. >>>>> >>>> That;s a lot of red and black wires... :-) >>> >>> I'm not talking of the device to measure volts, but of the distance >>> measure called "meter" or "metre". I'm unsure which, but the >>> dictionary insists it is "meter" in American English. >>> >> You are not American >> > .... and Carlos is discussing a French (sort of 'European') unit of > measure. ;-P Actually, international, consensual. :-p -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-12 22:46 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <11aih9n$3hlvd$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #70855 |
On 12/10/2026 10:27 pm, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2026-10-12 12:14, Daniel70 wrote: >> On 12/10/2026 8:45 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 11/10/2026 20:29, Carlos E.R. wrote: <Snip> >>>> I'm not talking of the device to measure volts, but of the distance >>>> measure called "meter" or "metre". I'm unsure which, but the >>>> dictionary insists it is "meter" in American English. >>>> >>> You are not American >>> >> .... and Carlos is discussing a French (sort of 'European') unit of >> measure. ;-P > > Actually, international, consensual. :-p > Yes, .... depending which system of Units you use. ;-) -- Daniel70
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-12 13:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ghuupmxeul.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #70857 |
On 2026-10-12 13:46, Daniel70 wrote: > On 12/10/2026 10:27 pm, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2026-10-12 12:14, Daniel70 wrote: >>> On 12/10/2026 8:45 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> On 11/10/2026 20:29, Carlos E.R. wrote: > > <Snip> > >>>>> I'm not talking of the device to measure volts, but of the distance >>>>> measure called "meter" or "metre". I'm unsure which, but the >>>>> dictionary insists it is "meter" in American English. >>>>> >>>> You are not American >>>> >>> .... and Carlos is discussing a French (sort of 'European') unit of >>> measure. ;-P >> >> Actually, international, consensual. :-p >> > Yes, .... depending which system of Units you use. ;-) The international one, obviously. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units> That wiki page is translated to 156 languages. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-12 21:11 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <11aibo2$3fiql$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #70818 |
On 12/10/2026 12:18 am, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2026-10-11 12:15, Daniel70 wrote: >> On 11/10/2026 4:34 am, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 2026-10-10 01:08, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>>> On 2026-10-09, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 09/10/2026 21:20, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>>>>> On 2026-10-08 14:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Only if you need to use the brakes a lot >>>>>> >>>>>> No. >>>>>> >>>>>> In hilly country you first use the motor as a brake, >>>>> >>>>> In an automatic car, you do not >>>> >>>> You can if you want. I often downshift an automatic >>>> on a downhill grade. >>> >>> The only automatic car I have driven was recently a Fiat 600e that I >>> rented. Electric. The regenerative brake is brutal. >>> >>> You can set the cruise controller to 90km/h on a 2000 thousand meter >>> high sierra, and it will keep the speed both going up or down. I >>> tested it. >>> >> Are you sure, Carlos?? >> >> DuckDuckGo suggests Mount Everest (highest point on Earth) is only >> 8,849 mtrs high .... somewhat less than your "2000 thousand meter high >> sierra". ;-P >> >> Or are you meaning "2000 thousand meter on the high sierra"?? > > Oops. Typo. > > Two thousand meters. Or 2000 meters. > Don't you just Hate it when the fingers work faster than the brain?? ;-P -- Daniel70
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-12 13:26 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1psupmxgth.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #70843 |
On 2026-10-12 12:11, Daniel70 wrote: > On 12/10/2026 12:18 am, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2026-10-11 12:15, Daniel70 wrote: >>> On 11/10/2026 4:34 am, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> On 2026-10-10 01:08, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>>>> On 2026-10-09, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 09/10/2026 21:20, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>>>>>> On 2026-10-08 14:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only if you need to use the brakes a lot >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In hilly country you first use the motor as a brake, >>>>>> >>>>>> In an automatic car, you do not >>>>> >>>>> You can if you want. I often downshift an automatic >>>>> on a downhill grade. >>>> >>>> The only automatic car I have driven was recently a Fiat 600e that I >>>> rented. Electric. The regenerative brake is brutal. >>>> >>>> You can set the cruise controller to 90km/h on a 2000 thousand meter >>>> high sierra, and it will keep the speed both going up or down. I >>>> tested it. >>>> >>> Are you sure, Carlos?? >>> >>> DuckDuckGo suggests Mount Everest (highest point on Earth) is only >>> 8,849 mtrs high .... somewhat less than your "2000 thousand meter >>> high sierra". ;-P >>> >>> Or are you meaning "2000 thousand meter on the high sierra"?? >> >> Oops. Typo. >> >> Two thousand meters. Or 2000 meters. >> > Don't you just Hate it when the fingers work faster than the brain?? ;-P Yep. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-10 03:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11ac8e8$1bt0r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #70791 |
On 2026/10/9 22:32:29, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 09/10/2026 21:20, Carlos E. R. wrote: >> On 2026-10-08 14:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> Only if you need to use the brakes a lot >> >> No. >> >> In hilly country you first use the motor as a brake, > In an automatic car, you do not > > End of your thesis. > > No, you snipped the part of his reply about regenerative braking (which most petrol/Diesel cars (whether automatic or manual) don't have, or don't have sufficient battery capacity to use). -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Always let the other side have the last word. For then it will be their foolishness, and not yours, that lingers in people's minds. - Philip Herlihy in alt-comp.os.windows-10, 2026-5-28
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | uk.tech.broadcast
csiph-web